Reviews
DEFINITELY GETTING DEMON-ETIZED: ‘Deadstream’ Review
Ladies and gentlemen, we’ve got another first for Horror Press after recently posting our 200th article. This time, we’ve got a full-on comedy on our hands.
Of course, we’re Horror Press, so the film has got to be a horror-comedy, it’s what I’d consider more of a comedy-horror. And Deadstream is a great one. After being suspended from Youtube and Twitch—I mean, LivVid, hacky haunt vlogger Shawn Ruddy’s “triumphant” return to the internet involves an IRL livestream exploring Death Manor, a decrepit haunted house in the woods that has seen a dozen deaths since its creation. And of course, this stream is going to have some unconventional guests from beyond the material plane.
Perfect Opening for a High-Concept Horror-Comedy
Deadstream just might have the perfect opening for the movies high concept. If they ever do a Deadstream 2 (which they should since I think they could push harder on the horror angle and have just as much fun with it), I would be very hard-pressed to think of one that works better than this. From the very opening shot of the movie, it perfectly satirizes the inane zeitgeist of scumbag 2010s YouTube personalities that dominated the screens of so many an impressionable child. A large part of that is due to Joseph Winters, whom I must give serious props to for pulling triple duty as a co-writer, co-director, and star of the film.
Winters’ performance and Shawn as a character tie into how the movie also avoids one of the great pitfalls of found footage horror. 1. It’s pretty clearly not meant to be taken 100% seriously, and 2. We have a reason our character keeps filming and actively goes deeper into the dark depths of a haunted house; not a dedication to the truth, or a missing family member, Shawn is just a completely believable money-hungry, narcissistic idiot who can’t turn off the act, and by extension, can’t turn off the cameras. He is a perfect idiot who traps himself and gets in his own way. Winters accurately depicts that especially slimy breed of Internet click-farmer, who always hints at a darker and scummier side than their loud, colorful persona would allow.
Technical Brilliance in Found Footage Horror
It also avoids the big technical flaws of many found footage horror movies in that the cameras and the mechanisms for editing all feel believable, especially with how good commercial cameras and stream deck programs have gotten. Even the diegetic music in the film is explained with a series of clever visual gags, and its little details like that which I appreciate The chat graphics, the lighting being well balanced, the movement of the cameras and integration of motion-sensors, they don’t ever take you out of the film.
A measure of thought and care was put into this movie that never really leaves, and it helps me overlook some of the movie’s issues. The soundtrack isn’t very inspired but is still catchy. The makeup is a bit wonky at times, with one very Party City looking mask on one of the ghost-demon-ghoul creatures, but it’s serviceable for the film’s purposes; the movie is here to amuse, not terrify. There are moments where the makeup looks good in some scenes, but the film’s practical effects only really stand out in its very splattery and grimy moments designed to gross you out to the max. That, in conjunction with some pretty good location scouting and set design, makes its mise-en-scene just work.
Is Deadstream Funny? A Comedy for a Specific Audience
So here comes the cold-water splash of every comedy movie review. Is Deadstream funny? Well, I think it’s hilarious, and Winter’s comedic timing is never off-tempo or off-tone enough to change my mind on that. But I must warn you that most, if not all, of the humor in this film will probably not land if you’re not amused by how Winters can replicate those radioactively dangerous levels of content creator cringe. Shawn as a character is despicable and over-the-top, but if you can’t find humor in that within the first 5 minutes, you’re probably not going to enjoy this one. This is not a film that will have everyone in stitches, but I think the audience who does understand what this movie is making fun of will find it hilariously realistic.
If you don’t have Shudder already, this film is a strong case for the kind of very innovative originals the platform is producing and distributing that you should be subscribed for. I’ve watched my fair share of horror movies this month on Shudder, and even Deadstream, the one that was just barely horror, was still pretty darn good.
Final Verdict: A Fun Horror-Comedy for October Viewing
Don’t go into Deadstream expecting to be terrified. It’s a fun little watch, first and foremost, with a specific audience in mind. This can also serve as a palate cleanser for the more numbing or terrifying horror movies you might watch this October, so stick this into the rotation after your Martyrs’ or Wolf Creek’s if you need to get the ick off.
Deadstream comes to Shudder this Thursday, October 6th.
Reviews
‘House of the Dead 2’ Review: Far Better Than The Original
Uwe Boll’s House of the Dead is a trash movie classic. For many, it exists as a ‘so bad it’s good’ movie. For me, House of the Dead is so bad it’s bad. Before looking up movies for March, I had no clue there was a House of the Dead sequel! This is the first time this month that I’ve stretched the category limit, as House of the Dead 2 merely premiered on the Sci-Fi Channel. Remember when movies premiered on the Sci-Fi Channel on Fridays and Saturdays? Those were great times. Seeing commercials all through the week, leading up to the big premiere. Ugh. I miss those days.
Zombies Take Over Cuesta Verde University in House of the Dead 2
House of the Dead 2 takes place a few months after the happenings of the first film. When one of Professor Roy Curien’s (Sid Haig) test subjects escapes containment at Cuesta Verde University, AMS is tasked with securing the campus. Led by Alexandra “Nightingale” Morgan (Emmanuelle Vaugier) and Lieutenant Jake Ellis (Ed Quinn), the team descends on the campus with wanton disregard for student safety. Bullets fly and heads explode as AMS gets closer to finding a blood sample…but the ticking clock starts ticking faster when they’re told a series of missiles will level the college campus shortly. Who will live and who will die in House of the Dead 2?
From writer Mark A. Altman and director Michael Hurst, House of the Dead 2 is a slower, more contained, faster-paced entry into the House of the Dead franchise. While the infected lack the scare factor from those in the original, they succeed at creating a frantic environment and an overall more entertaining film than Boll’s abortion of a motion picture. Thankfully, this sequel’s pacing is improved over the original.
Dialogue and Performances: Campy, Cringe, and Self-Aware
One of my main issues with the original is the overly snappy dialogue. Everything is a joke, a setup for a joke, or cringe “macho” lines. While the majority of Altman’s script carries that over, there’s a more refined element to the dialogue. That could also be attributed to better actors like Vaugier, Quinn, Victoria Pratt, Nadine Velazquez, and Sticky Fingaz. Much of the dialogue here does feel a bit cringe in its entirety, but the cast of 2 leans into it so much more. Part of me feels like Boll took a way too serious path with the original, while Hurst leans into the kookiness and over-the-top energy that makes this film work.
But I’m glossing over the main point of what this film is: a zombie film. The topic of slow vs fast zombies is one of the most annoying topics in horror. Just let them be whatever they are! House of the Dead 2 is full of slow zombies, though some do seem to move at a medium-ish pace. As stated, the infected here lack some of the scare factor from the original, but they make up for it in overall tenacity. Plus, they look gnarly. The team from Almost Human made, I can’t believe I’m saying this, some of the best-looking infected prosthetics I’ve seen in a zombie film. Each zombie feels like they have their own story to tell, and the extras who brought the infected to life play that up very well. Whether it’s a one-off zombie or a whole horde, you can feel the characterization behind them.
The Missed Opportunity: Mosquito Zombie Infections
My biggest issue with this film is something they dropped really quickly. At one point, three AMS members are in a dorm room, looking for infected to kill. One of the members is bitten by a mosquito and becomes infected. On top of the throwaway line about how the infected are evolving, the idea of the infection being transmitted by mosquitoes is a great idea, but one that is quickly dropped. Maybe they had plans to go deeper into this idea with the failed third film, but I was hoping that would have been pushed forward in the story.
A Better (and More Self-Aware) Zombie Sequel
House of the Dead 2 is a fairly typical zombie movie. It’s an ensemble film that introduces way too many characters with the promise of picking them off one by one. But it’s less on the nose than the original and plays into the more darkly humorous side that Uwe Boll couldn’t touch with a ten-foot pole. With an attractive cast that knows what they’re in for, a cast that chews up the scenery as much as the undead, House of the Dead 2 brought life into a dead franchise. I’m just glad we didn’t get that reported third film with…Dean Cain (yuck!).
Reviews
‘Bring It On: Cheer or Die’ Review: A Blood Free Slasher That Fumbles the Franchise
Growing up in the mid-90s, I bore witness to some very out-there films. One of the films that defined cinema for many of the women I grew up with was Bring It On. I have never gotten around to seeing the film; being a teen boy in a red town, I was more of a Fired Up! guy. I have long known of a horror installment in the Bring It On series, but had zero interest in ever checking it out. Knowing that Bring It On: Cheer or Die premiered on the SyFy Channel gave me the perfect excuse to finally watch it. Yikes.
What is Bring It On: Cheer or Die About?
Abby (Kerri Medders) is the head cheerleader for The Diablos. Abby and her team are barred from doing any interesting choreography due to an incident from 20 years ago, by Principal Simmons (Missi Pyle). The team decides to go behind Simmons’s back and do a 24-hour rehearsal-thon at the building that their high school used to be in. Once at the abandoned building, someone donning their high school mascot’s costume starts picking off the cheer squad one by one. Will anyone in the cheer squad make it to regionals (Glee joke!), or will this be their last pyramid?
It is at this point in my review, yes, even after watching the movie, that I’m realizing who one of the writers is. Cheer or Die is co-written by Rebekah McKendry and Dana Schwartz, which comes as a complete surprise. I respect the hell out of Dr. McKendry. Her knowledge of the genre, its tropes and cliches, extends beyond what nearly anyone else knows. And I absolutely loved All The Creatures Were Stirring. So the fact that this is a film written by her floors me.
Comparing Cheer or Die to Modern Teen Slashers
While I’m not expecting Hereditary or Don’t Look Now-like storytelling from the seventh film in the Bring It On franchise, I was hoping for a little more than what it ended up as. I’ve discussed time and time again how much I enjoyed Fear Street: Prom Queen. Its general straightforwardness is refreshing in a subgenre that was forced to become too smart for its own good. Cheer or Die is just as straightforward, but nowhere near as good. Prom Queen is a very competent film; it looks great and is entertaining. Cheer or Die is not. It is vapid and pointless, an extreme waste of 91 minutes.
A slasher film should have at least one memorable kill. Right? There is not a single memorable kill, let alone a memorable moment, in Cheer or Die. On top of that, how do you have a blood-free slasher flick? I think there is one singular blood spray that is on camera for less than two seconds. I understand that you have to toe the line between appealing to Bring It On fans and genre fans, but it gets to a point where that line is pointless when you make a nothing film like this.
Karen Lam’s Direction and Technical Missteps
Was this film used as a tax scheme? Karen Lam apparently directed this film, but I didn’t see a single bit of direction the entire time. The cast recited their lines directly from the script with not a single bit of care in the world. I spent the near entirety of the film’s runtime just staring at the screen, wondering how this film got greenlit in the first place. If this were Lam’s feature directorial debut, I would cut it a bit of slack. But this was award-winning Karen Lam’s fourth film. Which is crazy considering the film refuses to adhere to any implication of the 180-degree rule. Wherever they wanted to set the camera, they set it. Few films feel like first-take films, but Bring It On: Cheer or Die feels like a film that utilized every single first take that they got.
Avoid Bring It On: Cheer or Die
My goal isn’t to take a film that someone put love and energy into and shit down its throat. But Cheer or Die barely deserves to be called a film. From its first bloodless death to its painfully obvious motive reveal, Cheer or Die fails at every single aspect. Hell, the killer(s) even say, “Story time,” when they tell the remaining cheer squad their motive. I expected more from the incredibly talented Dr. McKendry. All I can honestly say at this point is to avoid this film with every part of your being.


