Connect with us

Reviews

NO REST(STOP) FOR THE WICKED: ‘Glorious’ Review

Published

on

J.K. Simmons voice acting shines in this gloomy, filthy horror dramedy from “Doctor of Horror” Rebekah McKendry.

Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: an eldritch demi-god and a sad drunk walk into a rest-stop bathroom.

Of course, you haven’t cause Glorious is something else entirely. The second film with director Rebekah McKendry at the helm is a big step up creatively from her previous endeavor, “All the Creatures Stirring,” telling a tale that is as ambitious as it is cleverly contained. See, this was one of the bottle films from the height of the pandemic, but unlike something like Shadow in the Clouds, where that feels distractingly obvious, Glorious is just gloriously weird and thoughtful enough to keep you from realizing it.

The film follows Wes, a man who gets wasted after a messy breakup and finds himself beyond rock bottom in a rest stop bathroom after he becomes entangled in the plans of self-proclaimed god Ghatanothoa (Ghat for short). As Wes tries to escape the restroom and fight against his supposed destiny, he only finds himself getting pulled further into the gears of a long-running feud and dragged way beyond his depth.

Writers Todd Rigney, Joshua Hull, & David Ian McKendry pen a clever and darkly humorous script that doesn’t lay it on too thick with the comedy of it all; after all, the title of the film itself is a gloryhole joke; it could have easily done so and burned any of the tension in the movie. It reminds me a lot of The Color Out of Space & my favorite horror film of 2016, The Void, but on a smaller scale and with a more philosophical slant.

Advertisement

Glorious dwells primarily on what engenders the ever-growing culture of nihilism many people find themselves sinking into, the film running on philosophical fuel with references to Beckett, Sartre, Hobbes, and other greats I probably didn’t even pick up on a first watch scattered throughout this conversation of human nature.

Overall, I appreciate the film for taking one of the key aspects of cosmic horror and flipping it on its head by asking the question: what if one of those unthinking, unfeeling elder gods started to feel and care? And how disastrous could that be? And though its execution is a bit clunky, the twist of the film drives a double-wide trailer-sized knife through your gut as you try to keep up and recontextualize everything you’ve seen and suddenly get washed over with a feeling of ick.

But what of our leads having this conversation? Well, Ryan Kwanten, True Blood alum and the lead of the underrated James Wan vehicle Dead Silence is delightful in this. He portrays the perfectly pathetic end of a relationship and its consequences greatly, and he gets to engage in a lot of actors’ dream roles as the surprisingly complex Wes becomes gradually more and more unhinged through the course of the movie, making you wonder what his choices will be up until the film’s finale.

And of course, do I even need to say it? JK Simmons is the treasure of this film. He gives a wonderful and very calculated performance where his speech mannerisms, down to his choice of awkward words, and the cadence of his iconic and explosive anger. It’s clear that he had a lot of love for the character and the film as a whole and sculpted Ghat through his acting. If you love him as much as I do, and you’ve been waiting to hear his smooth voice since Season 1 of Invincible, you’re pretty much obligated to check this. He kills it here.

In terms of the cinematography, McKendry is clearly not referred to as a Doctor of Horror for no reason. She, alongside Jakob’s Wife DP David Matthews, have a great sense of space and framing that makes the most of their location and helps construct that “out there” vision of the film when it gets particularly bizarre. There is one scene that will make you believe it can rain inside of a bathroom (I know that sounds weird but trust me on this). The movie looks dead to rights disgusting, and if you’re squeamish, you’re going to be squirming thanks to the movie’s styling, which embodies mephitis. It takes a special talent to create a mise en scene that makes you want to hose down with a decontamination shower after seeing it, and it just gets worse in the best of ways as the story continues.

Advertisement

Despite how fun the movie is, it isn’t perfect. I’m not entirely a sycophant for this. Horror movies with big cosmic entities as their main villains rarely get the budget they deserve to portray the titanic nature of these shambling extra-dimensional horrors that make it into their scripts, and that’s no different here. While the practicals we see at the end are very well done, the CGI is clunky and probably could have avoided showing the big bad outright.

The film is also surprisingly short, coming in at very tight 80-some minutes. I think this film will benefit from a director’s cut, so I’d like to see what weird visuals and philosophical dialogue the McKendry’s and company have in the tank if an uncut version turns up.

BOTTOMLINE: This is a short, tightly contained watch with a surprisingly philosophically ponderous plot—you know, given this is a movie about a Lovecraftian horror stuck in a toilet stall. With well-paced humor and some absolutely batshit visuals sprinkled throughout, I’m excited for when this hits Shudder to see other people revel in the curious oddity that is Glorious.

Glorious premieres on Shudder Thursday August 18th.

Advertisement

Luis Pomales-Diaz is a freelance writer and lover of fantasy, sci-fi, and of course, horror. When he isn't working on a new article or short story, he can usually be found watching schlocky movies and forgotten television shows.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

[Review] ‘Mother!’ (2017) Is the Greatest Movie of the 21st Century

Published

on

Please give me a few minutes of your time as I take a weird deep dive into my favorite movie of all time. Darren Aronofsky’s Mother! is an incredibly divisive film, and I will never refute that. When I was thinking about what angle I wanted for this review, I was coming up blank. Jennifer Lawrence’s Mother is a compelling and beautifully written character so I knew it would fit this month’s theme. Cut to my 51st viewing of the film a few nights ago, a multi-hour call with a very good friend, and three pots of coffee…that’s when I found my angle.

For those who are unaware, the infinite monkey theorem states that if a monkey is given a typewriter and an unlimited amount of time, it will eventually write the entire works of Shakespeare. Even though NPR tried to disprove that, it still feels possible. If there was truly an unlimited amount of time, how could it not happen? But here’s where I have issues with this idea: who is the monkey, and who is the typewriter? Does Mother have the agency to actually change the outcome of her story? Is Him a passive observer? Does Him’s reactions to Mother’s actions dictate her next steps? And what can the death of first Mother/Foremother (Sarah-Jeanne Labrosse) and the awakening of third Mother/Maiden (Laurence Leboeuf) tell us? Join me as I try to decipher whatever the hell this movie is.

Mother! follows Mother, who awakens post-death from Foremother. Mother wanders around the house before being intercepted by Him. Him is a writer who has been frustrated by a bout of writer’s block. Man (Ed Harris) shows up out of the blue and is soon followed by Woman (Michelle Pfeiffer). After their two kids Youngest Brother (Brian Gleeson) and Oldest Son (Domnhall Gleeson) show up, and a fight ensues, one of them dies. This leads to a wild party to celebrate the deceased’s life in which Him eventually gets Mother pregnant. Him overcomes his writer’s block which leads to the downfall of everything.

When I first saw Mother! I was stunned. What started, on the film’s opening day, as a half-full theater ended with me and my friend sitting in a tearful silence. I went back the next day with another friend (the one I had a multi-hour phone call with for this piece) and watched the movie again. We both sat in stunned silence as the credits rolled. Thanks to being a MoviePass member (when it was still a movie a day), I was able to see Mother! every single day for the next five days. I have never had a theatrical experience like I did with this film. What was equally stunning was that Paramount Pictures had the guts to distribute a film like this.

Aronofsky has been very tightlipped about all of the intricacies of Mother!, and that’s okay. Frustrating, but okay. Here’s what we know. There are three main ideas behind Mother! and that is 1) the story of an artist and their muse 2) the destruction of Mother Earth and the most on-the-nose allegory 3) Him is God and Mother is Mary. While these ideas have been talked about to death, I want to look into how the infinite monkey theorem works here and how Him is experiencing one of the wildest examples of insanity seen in film.

Advertisement

Let’s take note of what we can infer as well as what is directly told to us. In the beginning, we see Foremother burn to death/explode the same way that Mother does. Maiden ends the film by turning over and saying, “Baby” as Mother does. Mother’s recitation of “Baby” is quite different from Maiden’s delivery. When we hear Mother say the line it sounds partially panicky, partially forlorn. Maiden’s almost sounds calm and accepting. To me, Mother’s delivery of the line almost feels like she’s calling out for the recently deceased child while Maiden’s call is toward Him.

The wording of this may sound offensive, but it is simply used in conjunction with the infinite monkey theorem. For the sake of my argument, I believe that Mother is the monkey. When I started writing this piece, I thought that Him might be the monkey until I realized I was wrong. The actual inciting incident of Mother! is when Man and Woman destroy the crystal. (The metaphorical biting of the apple.) Him is not just testing Mother, Him is also testing Man and Woman. When Him, Man, Woman, and Mother are sitting around the table drinking coffee, Mother brings out some snacks. One of the snacks is a bowl of what looks like cookies and two singular slices of fruit that look very similar to apples.

One can imply that Him is watching Man and Woman closely because he yearns for the romance he feels between them. I think he’s intently watching to see if they go for the two apples. Him has put Man and Woman in this scenario before and they have failed; here they have passed. It’s not until the breaking of the crystal that all hell [literally] breaks loose.

We see moments of reflection and acknowledgment in some actions. When Mother is asked by Him if Man can stay the night she replies with, “Of…course.” A tinge of sadness echoes through the line and she chokes on her words. When Man sees the crystal he asks if it was a gift from Mother and she replies with a singular, “No.” Again, her voice cracks, she sounds like she wants to cry. It’s almost as if she has been asked this before and something inside of Mother is telling her it was Foremother’s heart she was looking at.

There are countless examples of these moments that crossover between timelines. One can assume that if a monkey will eventually type the entire works of Shakespeare, it will also type a few of the same lines over and over. Multiple moments coexist within these different timelines, and something in Mother is letting her know that.

Advertisement

Him is God. The Great Storyteller. The most egotistical man that can exist. The true definition of good and evil. But is he writing Mother’s story or is she in charge of her own destiny? When Mother wakes up, she wanders around the house. She makes her way to the front door, opens it, and steps outside. Before she can take any further steps, as it can be interpreted as she wanted to continue walking, Him stops her. (This raises another question of whether or not she can exist outside of the confines of this astonishingly octagonal house.) It’s clear that Him remembers everything that happens with previous Mothers, but how far will he go to ensure Mother goes the path he truly wants?

Later in the day, Mother goes to one of the walls in the house to paint it. She puts muted yellow paint on the wall but doesn’t seem content with it. Mother puts her hand on the wall and sees the heart beating inside of it, a small amount of decay starts to grow. This prompts her to sprinkle a yellow substance in the paint for a more vibrant yellow, and she seems happy with the choice. This is one of many examples of the house speaking to Mother, warning her of potential mistakes.

Mother’s body fights back multiple times when she makes the wrong decision. Once Man is in the house, she goes to make tea. A cup is dropped and shattered, which sends a terrible ringing through her ears and a painful tightening of her chest. We know the crystal that reinvents the house is created upon the death of each Mother.

Later, Mother goes to the basement to grab sheets for Man after agreeing he can stay the night. As she grabs the sheets, the furnace kicks in. This seems to imply her decision to agree to Man’s stay is a mistake that Foremother made (which we know led to her demise). That same night, she flicks Man’s lighter off the dresser, which causes another bout of intense ear ringing and reveals a sliver of a charred floor. Once Woman is there, Mother finds Woman and Man making out. This reveals more of the charred floor.

Interestingly, we get a moment of Mother possibly making a choice previous Mothers have not. Mother and Woman go to the basement and Woman makes fun of Mother’s plain underwear. After Woman leaves the basement, Mother sees a pair of Woman’s bright yellow underwear sticking out of the washer. Mother throws the underwear behind the washer (presumably to save it and use at a later date) but there’s no furnace sound. Has she finally made a good decision?

Advertisement

After the brothers arrive and have their tiff, Mother is left alone in the house to clean up. The spot where Younger Brother died has now turned into a goopy hole that reveals the then-blocked-off furnace. She rests her head on the wall while emptying the bloody water bucket, and we see the heart again. It’s decaying more and more.

Mother is still making the wrong decisions.

What does all of this tell us? Mother has a certain amount of agency. But also that previous mother’s soul wants her to succeed. We don’t know how many times Him has gone through this series of events, we only know that it hasn’t worked up to this point. We also don’t know what he wants. When Mother becomes pregnant, Him gets over his writer’s block and writes the New Testament. I believe that he’s completely Id-driven at this point. Him lost sight of what he needed to do and remembers the fame that comes with his writings.

The last thing Him says to Mother before she perishes is, “You were home.” As with nearly everything in this film that can have two meanings. Was that line meant to imply that Mother was in her rightful home? Did he think that she was the one who would end this cataclysmic cycle of pain and torment? Or was he saying that Mother was home? Is this his smooth-talking way of getting her heart to retroactively find solace in his love to turn into the crystal he so desperately needs to make Maiden? 

Mother! has an undeniably dense amount of layers that become increasingly apparent with each viewing. As I finish this article I have the film on in the background and I’m noticing more pieces of evidence that make my point more apparent. An argument could possibly be made that Him is the monkey and Mother is the typewriter but that all falls down to perspective and selective examples.

Advertisement

If there’s one thing I can leave you with, it’s that Mother! is one of the most important films of the 21st century. With the recent death of David Lynch, many people feel that art in Hollywood is truly dead. Few filmmakers can make a truly astounding piece of art that transcends time with the conversation it creates. Darren Aronofsky’s Mother! is a film that will be discussed for decades, if not centuries. That is unless we completely destroy Mother Earth and destroy it from the inside out.

Continue Reading

Reviews

[REVIEW] SXSW 2025: ‘Drop’ It’s Hard Not to Fall for This One

Drop is a surprisingly cool take on domestic abuse survivors woven into a thrilling narrative of a woman who is forced into a situation where she can trust no one. A single mother who survived an abusive ex-husband goes on her first date in years. She soon discovers that her first-date jitters are the least of her worries when she begins receiving anonymous drops on her phone. As the drops get more terrifying, she soon realizes that her son and sister’s lives hang in the balance as a mysterious tormentor forces her to carry out a chilling plan on her date.

Drop is fun, sophisticated, dangerous, and over the top in all the right ways. It is definitely worth checking out in a theater to see all of the jaw-dropping mayhem unfold. 

Published

on

Many genre fans know Christopher Landon from his wildly popular slashers (like Happy Death Day, Freaky) and his time in the Paranormal Activity universe. Because he’s carved out a name for himself in these two very different horror arenas, most of us leaned in when we heard Drop would be a thriller. I’m happy to report that Landon’s newest film has the energy of Wes Craven’s Red Eye. Elder millennials like myself might also feel a similar vibe to Robert Zemeckis’ What Lies Beneath chaotic conclusion. It is the kind of thriller that’s unafraid to go off the rails and swing big. Luckily, the payoff is huge and a compelling entry to an overstuffed subgenre. Drop breathes new life into the first-date-gone-wrong films and reinvigorates the mystery genre. It feels like a Hitchcockian fever dream filtered through a modern day lens. 

A Fresh Take on the Thriller Genre

Drop is a surprisingly cool take on domestic abuse survivors woven into a thrilling narrative of a woman who is forced into a situation where she can trust no one. A single mother who survived an abusive ex-husband goes on her first date in years. She soon discovers that her first-date jitters are the least of her worries when she begins receiving anonymous drops on her phone. As the drops get more terrifying, she soon realizes that her son and sister’s lives hang in the balance as a mysterious tormentor forces her to carry out a chilling plan on her date.

Violet (Meghann Fahy) wins us over immediately. We have all either been an abused woman, witnessed the abuse, or have seen the end results in the news. So, we instinctively want to root for her as Fahy begins making her a relatable survivor. She’s funny, smart, cool, and grounded and is easily everything more women characters should be. Fahy is also captivating as she drives this film to the out-of-this-world ending while having so much thrown on her plate. She navigates the humor, guilt, fear, and shame spiral as she ascends to her place as a badass. I also appreciate that while Violet’s past is central to the story, she is never a helpless victim. It is giving a final girl who survived her slasher and will carry those lessons with her instead of starting at square one for the sequels.

Her supporting cast is also very fun and filled with red herrings that make you doubt your prime suspect. Is the culprit her hot date, Henry (Brandon Sklenar), who has been very patient and understanding with a woman he is only meeting in person for the first time? Is it the cool bartender Cara (Gabrielle Ryan) who has kept an eye on Violet’s date? Or is it the many other characters she has encountered in this fancy restaurant? Because Drop is a proper mystery, it makes everyone seem like the perfect suspect. Which I enjoy as someone who sees a lot of predictable movies just lazily hand you the culprit in the first five minutes. 

Stunning Cinematography Elevates the Mystery

Another thing working in Drop’s favor is Marc Spicer’s sexy cinematography. The film is a feast for the eyes as it continually pans the opulent restaurant. The use of reflections captured in windows is stunning. The camera work adds a layer of spectacle that supports the narrative and makes it impossible to look away for a second out of fear you might miss another cool angle or shot. Jillian Jacobs and Christopher Roach have written a tight whodunnit that works on its own. However, the dazzling visuals are the icing on the decadent cake. 

Drop is fun, sophisticated, dangerous, and over the top in all the right ways. It is definitely worth checking out in a theater to see all of the jaw-dropping mayhem unfold. 

Drop falls into theaters on April 11.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement