Reviews
DISSECTING ORGANIC CINEMA: ‘Crimes of the Future’ (2022) Review
Is Cronenberg’s comeback brilliant or botched?
I’ve always felt like biopunk is a highly underrated genre, especially with how much screentime cyberpunk gets in mainstream media. The transhumanist dilemma that those works always delve into felt silly when the delineation between man and machine is so apparent.
But biopunk is a different beast altogether. What if those shiny new organs weren’t cybernetic, but organic, and perfectly melded with your own flesh? What if they were grown inside of and on your own body? At what point does the invasive flesh become native? How many new organs must be added until you’re not human? I mean, how human is humanity?
This idea is where David Cronenberg’s triumphant return to filmmaking, Crimes of the Future, dives deep like an exploratory biopsy. The philosophy of self in relation to the human body, culture, sex, morality, and everything in between is the heart of this film, and it’s a heart that beats hard enough for you to hear it from across the room. It’s a heart full of love and intrigue.
We follow performance artists Saul Tenser (Viggo Mortensen) and Caprice (Lea Sydoux), a duo specializing in artistic surgeries. They extract mysterious organs being sprouted de novo in the sickened Tenser’s body. As Tenser suffers from “Accelerated Evolutionary Syndrome,” a widespread conspiracy involving Tenser’s groupies, a reviled cult, and the highly bureaucratic government of this world seems to close in around the mesmerizing art he and his lover perform. All the while, a quiet biological disaster looms in the background of their dilapidated dystopia: human beings are no longer able to feel pain, leading to increasingly extreme displays of surgery and the popularization of self-harm for entertainment.
This film has been widely described as sci-fi body horror, and while I agree, for the most part, I also think that a large element of this film is more the sci-fi thriller on a romantic streak, something that the body horror is embedded in. This film’s most gruesome and hard to stomach death is undoubtedly horror, horror so good I felt a tingling in my neck for a few minutes after it. But its framing felt reminiscent of a hit in a mob film, and one of the characters even refers to it as an assassination.
Compared to the rest of Cronenberg’s filmography, Crimes of the Future isn’t unique in this way. Videodrome feels like a spy film where our main character doesn’t even know what side he’s on, and Existenz itself is a full-on meta-psychological thriller. In an intuitive move, this film contains homages and echoes of both of those films plot-wise; if you can believe it, even a large part of the story resembles The Fly.
Overall, the movie ends up feeling self-referential to Cronenberg’s previous films, but in a way that seems fond of them and utilizes them transformatively rather than rehashing the material (even the title is transplanted from another of his films despite not being related to it). Cronenberg gives us a bizarre and enrapturing love story between two characters in an uncertain world, finding comfort together as everything around them crumbles.
And yes, there happens to be freaky deeky surgical sex going on in this relationship, but who are we to kink shame?
As expected, the special effects here are fleshy, uncomfortably squishy, and organically out of place in the cold world around them, so classic Cronenberg. However, some of them feel much too animatronic, and you can tell exactly which ones got the most attention. The highlight of these is the SARK, a bone-plated, biomechanical, autopsy performing sarcophagus. It’s the anchor point for some of the film’s most intimate and painful moments, where Mortensen and especially Seydoux excel. The latter has a gothic and heart-wrenching speech that she pours her heart and soul into at the film’s climax. While the dialogue feels stilted when exposition is on the table, the chemistry between Saul and Caprice is subtle and torrid, saving this film from some of its monotony.
For a film about eccentric performers, it ironically squanders its greatest resource: Kristen Stewart, playing the unfortunately unforgettable Timlin. From the moment she’s first onscreen, she portrays the most perverse and strange character of the cast with a palpable and, at times, borderline comedic arousal. She’s awkward, erotically attuned to Tenser, and behaves like her mind is moving too fast to keep up with her physical, quaking need for recognition from him; it’s just so much fun to watch!
I don’t say unfortunately unforgettable because I dislike Stewart, but because she is irritatingly absent from the film for such an important player, both as an actress and an arm of the narrative. For some light spoilers, Timlin spends her final scene skulking around a corner rather than interacting with any of the main players, which is a crying shame since she could have been used so much more. The same could even be said for Welket Bungué’s Detective Cope, but it’s Stewart who was truly robbed here. That, on top of a potently abrupt ending, left me wanting more, for better or worse.
BOTTOMLINE: Cronenberg delivers a film that feels like looking back fondly on his most inventive works and creates a dramatically heavy piece. While it’s just shy of being truly great due to some of its choices, it’s an experience that grabs you and keeps you under the knife until it’s over. The haruspicy reads: get into the guts of this strange medical daydream and see this in theatres now.
Reviews
‘Undertone’ Review: A24’s Scariest Since ‘Hereditary’
A24 never stopped pumping out banger horror movies. Let’s get that out of the way, straight away. Even its commercial and critical flops, like Opus or Y2K, still took a lot of really original swings, even if it hasn’t been a string of masterpieces like in their horror heyday of the late 2010s and early 2020s. Still, they may have made their scariest yet with Undertone, in a return to A24’s original MO of pure indie filmmaking.
A Single Location Horror Film Powered by Sound
Undertone is not a perfect movie, with an occasional off story beat, and the ending just missing the mark of perfection, but it is a tried-and-true testament to the power of storytelling. With essentially one active, on-screen actress and a single location, the film manages to create a sensory hellscape with immersive nightmare-inducing audio that has both story and scares derived entirely from a podcast. It is a sensory overload of pure terror, one that feels deeply sinister in its pitch-black story, one that demands to be seen in the darkest possible movie theater.
A24’s Undertone: A True Crime Podcast Turns Supernatural
The story is pretty straightforward…at least at first. It follows a true crime/horror podcast host (Nina Kiry), who lives by herself as she takes care of her dying, elderly, and borderline vegetative mother. Her co-host (Adam DiMarco, who is never fully seen) is sent a series of ten mysterious audio files from an unknown address, presumably sent for her to listen to on the show. As they begin to record their latest episode with live reactions to the files, reality slips further as she and her co-host fall into supernatural delirium. Strange noises, slipping time, and other haunted house trimmings all come out to play, each elevated by (as mentioned) horrific sound design and an even more horrific backstory.
Nursery Rhyme Origins and Deeply Disturbing Mythology
The story is about 95% airtight. Without getting too deep into spoilers, the origins of these files and their meaning are deeply fascinating, with some elements and angles involving the origins of nursery rhymes that are very, genuinely disturbing. There is one twist in particular that explores what one of the sounds truly means, which is highly upsetting once pieced together.
That being said, Undertone has some familiar tropes, and while the movie mostly touches upon certain unexplored mythology, certain scenes can feel a little too familiar to other recent demon movies like Shelby Oaks. The true meanings are a lot more creative, but it could have played around with its mythos to create a truly original villain.
Undertone’s Ambiguous Ending Demands a Rewatch
Similarly, the ending is almost perfect. There is a final twist about something the protagonist might have done that is a little confusing, and reframes the context of the film. It is highly interesting, however, and opens up several cans of worms of what this movie has to say about children, motherhood, and parenthood as a whole, as well as posing questions about the movie’s setting and timeline. It is always better to remain vague in horror, which this movie definitely does, but just a slight retweak of its final act could give the audience just the tiniest more understanding, without it going into full, mainstream territory. The film definitely requires a second watch, and in the best way possible.
A Groundbreaking Podcast Horror Experience
In a nutshell, the film’s methods of storytelling are groundbreaking. This movie is not a podcast, but all of its scares and stories are delivered to us like it is one. It feels like the birth of a new medium or style of movie, a perfect blend of audio and visual, with emphasis on the audio.
Additionally, with the story being literally told to us as if we’re listening to the characters’ podcast itself, it is a nightmare rabbit hole.
Reviews
‘Silent Warnings’ (2003) Review: An Unknown UFO Gem
Like many people born in the mid-90s, the Sci-Fi Channel was one of my first introductions to horror. Whether it was random films playing or Sci-Fi’s 31 Days of Halloween, this channel was one of the main channels in my household. For the month of March, we’re going to take a look at Sci-Fi Originals (and maybe I cheated a bit and picked films that had their premiere on Sci-Fi). Picking films for this month was no easy task. Did I want to cover one of the plethora of amalgamated mega-animals fighting each other? Or what about shark tornadoes? One of the films I picked, after finding it too difficult to find Children of the Corn (2009) on streaming services, was an odd alien film I had never even heard of. That film is Silent Warnings.
What is Silent Warnings About?
Layne Vossimer (A.J. Buckley), his girlfriend Macy (Callie De Fabry), and a group of their friends head to Layne’s cousin’s house, Joe (Stephen Baldwin), after his mysterious death. Once there, they find the house in disgusting disarray. The friends decide to help Layne clean it up in order to put it on the market. But things quickly go south when they find a series of VHS tapes Joe left behind in the attic. What’s revealed in those tapes shows something that’s out of this world. Can Layne, his friends, and Sheriff Bill Willingham (Billy Zane) fend off these otherworldly invaders before it’s too late?
Conspiracy Theories, Mental Health, and Paranoia in Silent Warnings
As stated, this film was a late pick as I could not find 2009’s Children of the Corn streaming anywhere. Boy, am I glad I picked this. Silent Warnings has its fair share of issues. But it makes up for them in so many ways. This film is a very sober look into conspiracy theories, mental health, and the lengths that people go to when it comes to perceived threats. We get very little Stephen Baldwin, but what we do get is more than enough. He’s a recluse who lives on his 40-ish-acre property that’s been alien-proofed. His best friend (cousin?) is a scarecrow that has an AK-47. And he constantly records incoherent ramblings with his camcorder. Baldwin absolutely kills in his limited screentime. It’s like Stanislavski said, there are no small parts, only small actors.
Small-Town Horror and UFO Lore in Porterville
The quaint town of Porterville acts as the perfect backdrop for a story like this: a sleepy, nowhere town, where most people know each other. A town where the big call of the day for the Sheriff is about a missing dog. It’s the perfect setup for a story like this. It even mirrors many of the towns mentioned in Silent Invasion: The Pennsylvania UFO-Bigfoot Casebook. Much of this film’s atmosphere, the crop circles, acres of corn, and the disintegrating house, create a condensed world that adds so much claustrophobia to the film’s soul.
Acting, Dialogue, and the Problem with Early 2000s CGI Aliens
That being said, there are quite a few issues. Mainly, the acting. Besides Kim Onasch, Michelle Borth, Billy Zane, and A.J. Buckley (mostly), much of this film’s acting feels very Sci-Fi Original. It doesn’t help that the film’s dialogue, from writers Bill Lundy, Christian McIntire, and Kevin Gendreau, is just plain boring. And that’s not even mentioning how awful the CGI aliens look. A 2003 film about aliens, when only two or three are shown on screen, should be fully practical. And the fact that they use digital aliens takes away much of the film’s punch.
Why Silent Warnings Is an Underrated Sci-Fi Original
Silent Warnings doesn’t break much ground when it comes to the topic of aliens/Ufology, but it’s damn entertaining. But that’s the thing. Films don’t necessarily need to break new ground. I appreciate the swings this film takes, whether they hit or miss. There’s a wonderful setup with Stephen Baldwin, and the slow build to an exciting finale makes it all worth the wait. For a Sci-Fi Original, Silent Warnings has worked its way into my heart.


