Connect with us

Reviews

‘Scary Movie’ (2026) Review: Fresh Rememberslop

Published

on

Scary Movie is the kind of comedy I can only describe with the word “despair”. It’s not mind-bogglingly bad, or heartbreakingly cruel. But it is a cold reminder of one of the bigger, worse changes in the cinematic landscape from the mid-2010s onward. A change that scarred over rather than healed nicely. Of all the casualties of the shift in cinema over the past decade and a half, no death has been as sad or slow as that of the mid-budget comedy.

Sure, you’ll get a Naked Gun reboot once in a while. You might even get your Nirvana: The Band: The Show: The Movie occasionally; that is to say, a brilliant bit of lightning in an Orbitz bottle that’s hard to forget. But because of the perceived financial risk of comedies since the late 2010s, there’s been a sort of genetic bottleneck for the quality of these films. If it isn’t an IP sequel, it’s a vanity project or a low-effort release. You might get something great, but more often than not, you get Coming 2 America (2021). You get Bride Hard. You get The Breadwinner. And if you’re especially unlucky, you get Scary Movie.

What Is Scary Movie (2026) About?

In a direct parody of Scream 5 (and every other big horror movie of the past 4 years), legally distinct Ghostface is back for vengeance. And it isn’t Deputy Doofy this time! Our bloodthirsty killer is here for Cindy Campbell (Anna Faris), trying to use her estranged daughters as a way of luring her back to—

It’s the Halloween reboot too. It’s not just Scream. Look, all the people from the first one are back. We got Regina Hall, Marlon and Shawn Wayans are in it. Keenen Ivory Wayans even wrote on this one, the brothers have creative control again. Isn’t that what you wanted? Cheri Oteri is in it! That’s something, right? You guys liked her on SNL? Well, I did.

Anyway, that’s the movie. It’s “People and Things You Know: The Movie”.

Advertisement

You Can Be Low Brow, But You Still Have to Be Funny

And it’s not like that hasn’t been the formula for these films for the past 26 years. They’re parodies. You don’t come to the sixth Scary Movie expecting a Judd Apatow film all of a sudden. He’s a director the movie name drops in its cold open, which is ironically a testament to how frozen in time the Wayans bits are. It’s just that this time, their run back to the well has returned a bone-dry bucket.

Cards on the table: I like Scary Movie 2. I vaguely remember liking Scary Movie 3. I think it’d be difficult for you to find someone who doesn’t describe my humor as “low brow”. I’m hardly one to pearl clutch. And despite objecting to truly mean spirited or genuinely racist material, I have a pretty decent tolerance for messed up jokes.

So, understand me when I say: despite whatever marketing you’ve seen that tried to chum the waters with controversy, Scary Movie doesn’t have it. Scary Movie does not push the envelope. I don’t even know if it bought the envelope in the first place. It is a half send—no, a quarter send, masquerading as a full send.

Weren’t We Supposed to Be Crossing a Line Here?

The offensive humor that was supposed to “cross every line” as the movie’s tagline promised is, with no due respect, tepid weaksauce. I will say, there was one joke I would classify as so bad that it induced pure cringe. But that’s just due to recent events in my neck of the woods. Beyond that, the Wayans’ attempts to shock are about as electric as static. And worse off, they’re structurally just bad jokes.

I don’t really blame Scary Movie for being late to lampoon all the biggest horror films of the past decade. I don’t blame them for taking the most predictable path with jokes. I don’t blame the Wayans for rehashing old bits for nostalgia’s sake. In isolation, that’s inoffensive. But I do blame them for the incessant need to hammer the same exact joke over and over again: the “remember when”.

Advertisement

Remember the COVID Pandemic? Remember Hawk Tuah? Remember the “I’m Not Gay No More” Guy? Remember Kai Cenat, and Twitch streaming? Remember The Wire? It isn’t just “remember when” references to horror films; it’s “remember when” references to everything. And let us not forget the timeless musings of Tony Soprano: “Remember when is the lowest form of conversation”.

Snatching Defeat from The Jaws of Victory

This isn’t dropping a sudden hilarious parody of the Nike Freestyle advertisement as they did in 2; it’s throwing every piece of uncooked spaghetti at the wall and trying to make it stick. In what feels like a desperate desire for approval, the movie needs you to like and enjoy all these references. Because the collective memory of dated pop culture is the rickety, particle-board framework every joke is nailed to. Whereas the original films had the novelty of mocking trends in horror in the crassest way imaginable, this feels so much more generic. It’s just not as fresh, by virtue of time passed and the way it’s built.

And you know the worst part? The movie manages to have some genuinely funny moments. The last roughly ten minutes of the film are even enjoyable. It’s not like the Wayans are hacks, they still have comedic chops after all this time. Some of the sight gags are good, and some of the line deliveries even work. But then, like clockwork, they shoot themselves in the foot and try too hard to drag even those out.

As soon as something entertaining comes, it’s gone even quicker and replaced with a reference that doesn’t make any sense and bleeds dry the momentum of previous zingers. Scary Movie (2026) is a comedy that manages to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory constantly. It’s deeply disappointing, because the Wayans have talent that is weighed down by an inability to pick and choose when to deliver the punchline. And invariably, inevitably, the audience is left waiting for more.

Advertisement

Luis Pomales-Diaz is a freelance writer and lover of fantasy, sci-fi, and of course, horror. When he isn't working on a new article or short story, he can usually be found watching schlocky movies and forgotten television shows.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

‘Evil Dead Burn’ Review: Silly, Sloppy, but Seriously Entertaining

Published

on

A compliment first: once Evil Dead Burn’s first act ends, the film is cut loose to go wild like Sam Raimi running around with a camera strapped to his head (not a motorcycle, but thanks Bruce, it was a good piece of fake trivia while we believed it). And it’s at that turning point, when the film abandons most of the pretense of its very artificial, featherweight drama, that I started to love Evil Dead Burn. All in all, the film is a seriously entertaining endeavor in its second and third acts for how kinetic it can be.

The cold water second: Evil Dead Burn is poorly edited. But are Sébastien Vaniček and Philip Lozano’s directing and photography good enough to make up for it? Not particularly, no. But, is the story good enough to cover that up? Also no. But does it have great dialogue and humor to make up for it? Again no. But—you see where I’m going with this.

So, I’m sure you’re wondering what I actually enjoyed about this film, if it’s so flawed. And that is one simple fact: Burn is the Evil Dead franchise’s equivalent of a pro wrestling match. And Vaniček’s entry is taking you directly to a deadite royal rumble.

What Is Evil Dead Burn About?

The premise the film starts you off with would obviously never make that apparent. After her boyfriend Will is killed in a horrific car crash, Alice (Souheila Yacoub) is in shambles. Their final moments were a blow-out argument in a long string of abusive behavior on Will’s part. And to make matters worse, as she tries to reckon with that painful relationship, she is forced to attend his funeral and stay at his family’s home in the countryside. High emotions worsen tensions, as the in-laws that already ostracized her become even more aggressive.

But Will’s death was much more complicated than anyone knows: the grisly passing was set up to find the Price Family. Because Will’s brother Joseph has tampered with some very special occult items, and in the process awakened the evil dead to search for their personal effects once more. As one might expect from relentless Kandarian demons at this point, they will stop at nothing to find their possessions, even if it means tearing the family apart piece by bloody piece.

Advertisement

The Deadites Are Really Just Here to Put Belt to Ass

The fact of the matter is, Evil Dead Burn only really has enough structural support for its true star: the ridiculously bloody action it has on offer. This is not a ponderous horror film on the nature of trauma, despite its efforts to prod at that. It’s not a surprisingly contemplative film talking about addiction like, say, Fede Alvarez’s 2013 turn at the wheel. It is, however, the cinematic equivalent of that one RAW promo where Triple H breaks into Randy Orton’s house and just starts putting belt to ass.

The film is at its best when it’s simply letting the deadites run roughshod with their host bodies and their human prey. Tossing each other into furniture and running the fade with extreme malice, it’s borderline action horror with how much they throw down. And it looks great too, in no small part to some phenomenal practical gore and physical acting on the parts of both the main cast and their stunt performers.

The Perfect Family (of Horrific Demonic Undead)

Alyssa Sutherland’s deadite Ellie Bixler was like a slinking undead spider, crawling around and waiting to strike when her victims were at their most scared. But the Price family of Burn is more like a herd of bulls rampaging through a hospital and aiming for the patients on life support. I really can’t emphasize enough how much the stunt performers run this film, since their physicality and wild movement is perfectly in line with their fellow lead actors who get to play the deadites.

The undeniable highlight of the film is Erroll Shand. His role as the slimy grieving father Edgar is almost as good as Ellie with how absolutely nasty and demented he gets; he has the particular pleasure of working a true gross-out moment that felt like watching a Brian Yuzna film for the first time, so bravo to him if it goes to anyone. A close second for shock factor is Luciane Buchanan, who gets multiple franchise great moments as Thya. But really, the entire deadite family is fantastic once they’ve shed the weight of the film’s bag-of-rocks dialogue and get to just be sick little freaks.

(All due respect to the sick little freaks reading.)

Advertisement

An Examination of Abuse Deflated by Amateurish Writing and Editing

It’s doubly disappointing that Evil Dead Burn’s script is so bad in places, because the conceit of Alice’s situation is rife with potential for some really emotional scenes. Touching on the complexity of abusive relationships and how people begin to blame themselves for staying in them is inherently intriguing. It’s so perfectly in line with the way deadites psychologically torture their victims that the allegory feels wrapped like a present with a bow. And Yacoub is at the very least competent enough to work with that, she’s very engaging when she grows into full final girl form to fight back.

But the dialog is so aggressively one dimensional and unsubtle in communicating the issue at hand, it converts what could be rich drama into something cheap and flimsy. When the film tries to stoke the dramatic fires of Alice’s turmoil, it starts to feel more like a tone-deaf Lifetime movie where things are so incredibly over the top you can’t take it seriously. It’s just a tonal clash with this film’s better, more chaotic half that I can’t get behind.

If You’re Doing the Stunts, And I’m Doing The SFX, Then Who’s Editing This Movie?

This is an issue only exacerbated by the film having some seriously inappropriate timing in its editing. Most noticeable are these disorienting cuts across the entire runtime that feel like the film reel skipping. But what really gets me is the placement of these harrowing flashbacks to Alice and Will’s relationship that just don’t work. They get popped in at inopportune times to emphasize how high the stakes are emotionally for Alice. Of course, this only lowers the stakes. In isolation, the footage might have been effective (read in a doubtful tone). But in the context they’re inserted into, it evokes the feeling of someone shoving both feet on the brakes; a jarring stop in the momentum, to say the least.

Is Evil Dead Burn Worth Seeing?

So yes, Evil Dead Burn is a film that is slow to warm with its clammy writing and ice-cold editing. But once things get heated up and the film’s ensemble cast of villains are off their leash, it provides an impressive enough spectacle to keep you surprised at the wackiness and violence it achieves. And that’s saying something given the franchise’s laundry list of grotesqueries and always reliable chainsaw shenanigans. It’s hard to say if this will actually become a fan favorite with its many hiccups, but at the very least it keeps the old adage true: there’s no such thing as a boring Evil Dead film.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Film Fests

Chattanooga Film Festival 2026: ‘Frankie, Maniac Woman’ Review

Published

on

I’ve said time and time again that horror comedies/dark comedies aren’t my forte. Filmmakers often don’t find the right balance between horror and comedy, usually resulting in a mishmash blend that feels unfocused and lacking. Moreover, I love ambitious films; horror comedies don’t often lend themselves to ambition. (That’s not a diss by any means.) Films like Tucker & Dale vs. Evil, The Draft!, and Chainsaws Were Singing are just a few that really broke the mold for me. Thanks to the lovely programmers at Chattanooga Film Festival, I can now add Frankie, Maniac Woman to the list of exceptional horror comedies. 

Frankie, Maniac Woman Delivers a Bloody Twist on Horror Comedy

Frankie Ramirez (Dina Silva) is trying to break into the industry one way or another. Little did she know that her fame would come at a bloody price. Denial after denial, being told she’s not skinny or pretty enough, when enough was enough…Frankie takes her revenge. Can Frankie slash her way to the top of the charts? Or will her path of violence become too much for her to handle? 

Co-written by Dina Silva and Pierre Tsigaridis and directed by Pierre Tsigaridis, Frankie, Maniac Woman is truly a sight to behold. Pierre Tsigaridis’ third feature film takes us to a deeper level than we’ve seen before (though that might not be fair to say, as I’ve only seen his first film, Two Witches). But much of the joy from this film comes from Silva’s co-writing and performance. Oh yeah, and the gloriously violent nature of it all. 

Dina Silva Creates One of Modern Slasher Horror’s Best Villains

Dina Silva’s occasionally masked portrayal of Frankie brings us one of horror’s greatest villains of all time. Rarely do we see women in horror take the main stage as such a violent force of nature. And what we also see is a devilishly smart script. Silva and Pierre Tsigaridis’ creation of Frankie brings us both a protagonist and an antagonist. Frankie wants this life where she can live as the performer she is meant to be (because Silva’s voice is gorgeous). On the other hand, Frankie’s direct actions will make sure she never has a career, you know, with the slayings and all. 

The beautiful nature of Frankie’s character is the moments of realization that she has warped the trajectory of her future with each subsequent kill. She could stop, sure, but what if killing is what she was meant to do all along? Frankie does have an amazing voice, but Frankie is a fantastic serial killer. If only there were a world where she could do both. 

Advertisement

Frankie, Maniac Woman Proves Great Slashers Need Great Stories

Now I’m unable to access the screener again, and the IMDb credits do not show the name, so I can’t fully praise the people in charge of Frankie, Maniac Woman’s SFX. A film like Frankie, Maniac Woman shows me just how wrong modern slashers are. Take Terrifier, for example. Terrifier’s story is bland, uninspired, recycled, and lazy. It’s nothing but filler around a series of fine kills. Frankie, Maniac Woman uses its kills to emphasize its incredibly well-written story. A fine film has a story that’s enough to pass the time; a great slasher has a story that uses kills as exclamation marks. 

Frankie, Maniac Woman’s kills are punctuation marks that are a level above exclamation marks. Whatever that may be. Frankie is an unstoppable killing machine, until she can be stopped. She’s not this infallible entity who can take six bullets to the torso and keep lumbering on…she’s just a person. A person with feelings, stamina, and brilliant comedic timing. She’s someone you could easily see yourself being friends with (as long as you didn’t know about the killings (hell, maybe even if you knew about the killings if that’s your thing)). 

Frankie, Maniac Woman Is One of the Best Festival Horror Films of the Year

Frankie, Maniac Woman is a devilishly stylized slasher that exudes camp and craft. When was the last time a film made you cry from laughter and sadness? When was the last time you watched a film so viciously riotous that you hoped things would just…work out in the end? On top of being funny, brutal, and bloody as hell, Frankie, Maniac Woman is a genuinely ‘G’reat film. It’s one of the few festival films I’ve seen that’s unquestionably Criterion-worthy. 

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria