Reviews
‘Ready or Not 2′ Review: A Bombastic Action-Horror Follow-Up
There’s an undeniable conflict in Ready or Not 2, and its very vocal tonal shift is evident. Fundamentally, it’s a sequel that manages seven years after the fact to feel as fun and fresh as its predecessor; that in and of itself is a little dark miracle courtesy of the Radio Silence team, maintaining for the umpteenth time that they definitely still have the mojo. But in its gory ambition to be more bombastic, and in its aggressively lightened up writing, it’s difficult to say the script and its execution meets or exceeds the original that took audiences by storm back in 2019 in terms of quality.
There’s a large divide here between being a great film and being a fun film, but at the end of the day Ready or Not 2: Here I Come is just like the prospect of playing hide and seek when you’re young: the appeal never really gets old.
Now Where Did I Put That Bloody Wedding Dress?
Picking up where the last film left off, Grace MacCaullay (Samara Weaving) has survived. The ultrawealthy Le Domas family she was going to marry into are no more; the board game moguls have been beaten at their own hellish game of hide and seek, magically splattered on the walls and floors of their burning estate. Grace has defeated a centuries long chain of human sacrifices and destroyed a satanic family of rich jerks in a most satisfying manner.
But the-bride-that-was-to-be surviving has only seemed to escalate things. The High Council, the rest of the families that run the world alongside the Le Domas, have been summoned for a double-or-nothing game against Grace. Whoever wins rules the planet, and whoever loses meets a grisly end. Caught in the crossfire is Grace’s estranged sister, Faith (Kathryn Newton), who the High Council ultimately forces to join the game. Now, the two chained together siblings must try to find a way out while the bickering billionaires race to secure their position as the leader of the High Council.
A 180-Degree Turn as Ready or Not 2 Puts the Action in Action-Horror
Returning writer Guy Busick made a strong choice in taking the pitch-black humor of the first film and replacing it with a more slapstick air. The villains are cruder, the dialogue is punchier, and there’s in general more straightforward and simple comedic beats by a country mile. Whether it’s a choice for the better is fairly subjective, but it certainly feels more like a lateral move than an elevation of the previous entry’s writing. That film relished in whip smart mockery of upper crust leeches. This is ultimately a film that is more interested in getting a conventional loud laugh than being subtly amusing, which it succeeds in quite consistently.
Outside of putting much more comedy into the horror, it’s also injected quite a bit more action into the situation. A cute clause among the High Council’s rules of engagement makes sure that there are a lot of fun weapons in play, each one saying something about the villains’ personalities and competence. It makes for a cute flourish, but more importantly, it makes for a lot of explosively violent set pieces. The film is bloody, loud, and aggressively action packed in the way you’d hope from a sequel trying to do everything bigger the second go around. Everything just pops a whole lot more.
An Astounding Assortment of Antagonists (Headed by Sarah Michelle Gellar)
Our killers on offer this time are all fun, allowing you to distinguish between them in a way that was absent from the first film. The Le Domas’ unfortunately blended together, but here the High Council’s arrogant assortment of old money monsters stands out. You’ll likely leave with a favorite after watching; for me, it was Ignacio, played with perfect smarminess by Néstor Carbonell.
Sarah Michelle Gellar and Shawn Hatosy are solid as our main antagonists, bringing a freshness to their stock characters as the villainous Danforth twins. Buffy bias notwithstanding, seeing Gellar play bad is very good, and she uses every minute of her screentime to the fullest. Hatosy primarily shines by showing off the breadth of his physical acting, speaking softly and carrying a big antique beatstick.
A Singed Sibling Relationship Is a Repetitive but Effective Emotional Core
This mainly leaves our main characters up for examination: Grace and Faith, our heroes whose strained relationship makes up the emotional core of the movie. Weaving steps back into the role perfectly, replete with plenty more primal screaming and the animalistic fighting style of a wild dog stuck in a bear trap. But her interactions with her sister are a weak point.
Newton is a perpetually welcome sight as the oafish and endearing comedian to Weaving’s straight man; doubly so when it comes to Radio Silence films since her effortlessly funny turn as Sammy in Abigail left fans wanting more. A beleaguered Grace having to catch Faith up on her life and the past 24 hours, does render some really great scenes, though it also inadvertently leads to a lot of the film’s clunkier dialogue. I’d be lying if I said their relationship doesn’t feel like it loops a couple of times in the film, with the same beat of them arguing happening over and over. By the final act of the film, they seem to have gotten their chemistry in order, to a satisfying effect in the closing, but not without going in circles during the first few acts.
Ready or Not 2 Is a Good Sequel—That Could Have Been Great
That is ultimately the biggest weakness of Ready or Not 2: a lack of restraint, a disregard for brevity. Some of its tricks lose luster by the final act, not because they aren’t entertaining or funny, but because they’re repeated or overstay their welcome. The film’s climax is probably the most glaring victim of this. It’s edited and shot perfectly, its music is perfectly in time, and its actors are going all in in a perfect chaotic arrangement. But the gut punch it provides doesn’t hit as hard because we’ve already been hammered with the same punch multiple times already. And though the slugfest is appreciated in how aggressive and over the top it is, it’s a quality that doesn’t bode as well for repeat viewings.
Ready or Not 2: Here I Come is a film that revels in the excesses of a genre film overhaul, basking in raw blood and ribald humor to great effect. But it’s also a film that indulges a bit too much. While it’s a damn good sequel, I find myself inevitably wondering about how great it could have been if it had reeled itself in more.
The act of cutting and stitching can grant new life to a long dead prospect, or it can unleash a monster. Dr. Frankenstein understood the stakes, as does any filmmaker aiming to salvage the unsalvageable. The X-Files creator Chris Carter hopes for a celebratory resurrection – or at least the chance to right some cinematic wrongs – with a recut of his 2008 movie, The X-Files: I Want to Believe. Hulu dropped this new version on August 14 under the appropriately cobbled-together title, The X-Files: I Want to Believe – Vrach Frankenshteyn. Carter insists it’s the edgy cut he’d always envisioned, untainted by notes from studio executives who wanted a sanitized PG-13 summer blockbuster.
The X-Files: I Want to Believe Gets a New Cut
If you’re not a die-hard X-phile, you could be excused for not even remembering the 2008 version of I Want to Believe. The box office bomb was released six years after the original show’s divisive series ending, in which Mulder and Scully depart from their X-Files post and become fugitives hunted by the FBI. Despite the open-ended nature of the TV finale, I Want to Believe was touted before its initial release as a Mulder-Scully reunion that would serve as a one-off case: the film would contain no references to the show’s ongoing mythology, which involved a convoluted alien conspiracy. This approach was welcomed by many fans who admired the scope and style of the first X-Files feature film, 1998’s Fight the Future, but longed to see a cinematic version of the show’s scary standalone tales like “Beyond the Sea” or “Home.”
Why the Original I Want to Believe Failed
Alas, the 2008 film is a plodding mess. Co-written (with Frank Spotnitz) and directed by Carter, the movie sees Mulder (David Duchovny, in all his deadpan glory) and Scully (Gillian Anderson, with all her understated power) co-habitating and keeping a low profile. Despite their fugitive status, the FBI enlists their help to find a missing agent. “All is forgiven,” the characters note, before it’s back to monster-chasing business as usual. Their only lead: Father Joe (Billy Connolly), a convicted pedophile priest who claims to have psychic visions. Scully’s outrage at his involvement leads her to a crisis of faith, while Mulder (and eventually the movie itself) has the stone-faced gall to encourage patience and sympathy for the sex offender. His visions eventually lead the duo to a Russian organ transporter running medical experiments to stitch together a new body for his ailing husband.
I Want to Believe Struggled as a Horror Movie
Even if I Want to Believe were a pristine thriller in the vein of Seven or Insomnia, its dour subject matter would still have sullied its chances against the competition: in the summer of 2008, the box office was dominated by crowd-pleasing juggernauts like Iron Man and The Dark Knight. But the movie is far from pristine. Its leaden pace makes it a chore for fans and newbies to withstand. Horror-wise, it lacks any monster-movie iconography or moments of unbearable dread. We’re a far cry from anything approaching the icky reveal of the sewer-dwelling Flukeman or the shiver-inducing antics of Satanic substitute teacher Miss Paddock.
I Want to Believe is devoid of the storytelling prowess, philosophical grit, stylistic innovation, and mordant humor that the show exuded at its peak. To top it all off, Carter populates the movie with bizarre directorial choices, including a moment in which Mulder gazes upon a framed photo of George W. Bush as the X-Files theme plays in the background, apropos of nothing. With its tonal muddle and meandering script, the movie was enough to make even the most dedicated fans question their belief in the franchise.
Chris Carter Returns to The X-Files
From 2016 to 2018, Carter revived the show for two seasons, which further served to frustrate longtime fans and newcomers with clunky creative choices. Since then, The X-Files has shown few promising signs of life, but it’s been awakened from the grave with recent news that Ryan Coogler, director of Sinners, is developing a reboot series. It appears that Carter has leveraged the newfound interest in the franchise to make this R-rated director’s cut a reality. But despite the writer-director’s claims that it’s gorier than the theatrical version, bloodthirsty horror fans are likely to shrug. The most notable additions of “gore” include a few new shots of dismembered body parts and headless corpses. These images feel more narratively functional than anything, dramatizing the “modern day Frankenstein” plot instead of just alluding to it in reams of expository dialogue.
How Vrach Frankenshteyn Improves the 2008 Movie
Crucially, though, the film feels tighter. It’s 7 minutes shorter than the original cut, and scenes are now edited at a more staccato, thriller-like pace. Much of what’s missing involves tender character moments between Mulder and Scully. Two of their smooches have been nixed, along with half of a scene that involves late-night cuddling between the paranormal-fixated paramours. References to the characters’ backstory have also gotten the chop, including nods to Mulder’s long-lost sister and Scully’s son she gave up for adoption. Mercifully, this new edit streamlines a tedious subplot involving a young boy whose dire illness Scully goes to great lengths to treat.
Mulder and Scully Remain the Film’s Greatest Strength
The slashing of these character-centric moments might sound ill-advised or even sacrilege to fans who believed Mulder and Scully’s potent onscreen chemistry was the only redeemable element from the theatrical cut. Surprisingly, it all works. Duchovny and Anderson do commendable work in conveying the pathos of all the heartache the duo has endured – their shared glances do more heavy-lifting than any of Carter and Spotnitz’s ham-fisted dialogue.
The X-Files Recut Still Has Major Problems
Still, all the recutting in the world can’t save the film from its inherent design flaws. Mulder and Scully are apart for far too long. Scully’s subplot with her young patient is a snooze, since it keeps her away from the X-File at hand. And that X-File is generic at best, homophobic at worst. The so-called “modern Frankenstein” wants to build a new body for his husband, whose connection to Father Joe plays into eyeroll-y stereotypes around trauma victims and queer people. In both 2008 and 2026, it all feels like something that would land on the reject pile in the Law & Order: Special Victims Unit writers’ room.
Is Vrach Frankenshteyn Worth Watching?
While the original I Want to Believe is all but unwatchable, Vrach Frankenshteyn feels more like perfectly serviceable streaming fare. With Coogler’s much-anticipated reboot, many curious genre fans are checking out the show for the first time, working their way through all eleven seasons. If these newcomers wish to include I Want to Believe and the revival seasons in their binge-a-thon for sheer completists’ sake, they’d be well-advised to watch Vrach Frankenshteyn instead of the original: it’s a re-animated cinematic corpse that isn’t quite as beautiful as the Bride of Frankenstein, but it’s not quite dead-on-arrival either. If nothing else, at least it leaves that inexplicable George-W.-Bush-photo moment on the cutting room floor.
The X-Files: I Want to Believe – Vrach Frankenshteyn is streaming on Hulu and Disney+.
David Robert Mitchell’s The End of Oak Street has only committed one crime: premiering this late into the summer movie slate. Hot off the heels of The Odyssey and Spider-Man: Brand New Day, one can only hope Oak Street won’t be lost in the noise of August’s bigger releases. Because those who go to see it will have the pleasure of witnessing one of the few movies this year to actually capture the feeling of those classic Hollywood blockbusters that made Steven Spielberg a household name. And indeed, it’s the blockbuster we’ve been waiting for.
What Is The End of Oak Street About?
The End of Oak Street follows the Platt family: mother Denise (Anne Hathaway), father Greg (Ewan McGregor), and kids Audrey and Brian (Maisy Stella, Christian Convery). Don’t forget their beloved dog, Starbuck (played by newcomer Brisket). Though they blend into their suburban confines as a typical family, turmoil bubbles as Denise and Greg’s strained marriage begins to take a toll on their children.
But soon, an even bigger problem begins to plague Oak Street. Mysterious flashes of light and sound that explode in the night, the largest of which culminates in the entire neighborhood being transported through time and space: from 1982 to the prehistoric era. As dinosaurs and other megafauna wreak havoc, hunting down the unprepared humans brought to their time, the Platt family struggles to figure out how they’ll stay alive and if they’ll even be able to find a way back home.
David Robert Mitchell’s Writing and Directing Make for A Certified Home Run
For those who have been starved for a truly great big-budget dinosaur film given the slow death of the Jurassic Park franchise, you really can’t ask for more than this. Writer-director David Robert Mitchell, the mind behind It Follows and Beneath the Silver Lake, has returned to mix sincere family-drama with a thrilling science fiction survival film. Oak Street blends a lot of heart into its gloomier aspects, at turns funny, dark, charming, and frightening. It runs the emotional gamut and keeps you pinned to your seat as Mitchell constructs a rich interior world for the Platt family that is grounded against the fantastic situation they’re thrust into.
They’re not revolutionary characters, not by a long shot. An emotionally distant father and a mother looking for purpose beyond a suffocating home life, rebellious kids who are impulsive and scared, it’s nothing new. The script writing isn’t bombastically clever. But it is incredibly compelling thanks to the naturalistic dialogue and on-screen chemistry between the four actors. The realistic struggles of the family, driven by phenomenal performances from Hathaway and McGregor first and foremost, balance against the more thrilling elements of the film and keep it from tipping over into mere spectacle.
80’s Suburbia Meets Cretaceous Terror in The End of Oak Street
When it zooms out from the family dilemma to indulge in that spectacle, though, it’s a visual feast and a half. Mitchell crafts an aesthetically luscious setting for the drama to take place in by melding 80’s suburbia with Cretaceous jungles. The blend of modern and primeval elements makes for a deadly and breathtaking environment, constructed with some incredible production design and wonderful digital effects.
Those effects never get old as we see the world beyond the block, and the same can be said for its numerous monstrous reptiles that populate it. Each new one the film pits the family against is more dangerous than the last, and they all look phenomenal. They have genuine weight and impact on screen, and if you even had to ask how, of course it’s Industrial Light & Magic doing their strongest cinema sorcery yet again.
Mitchell and Gioulakis Are On Their Photography A-Game
Mitchell and returning cinematographer Michael Gioulakis weave the camera through the neighborhood in a slick fashion, moving through buildings and yards deftly. They block every chase sequence and dinosaur encounter with immense style, resulting in some especially creative sequences. The locations feel purposeful, and the way the camera swoops and dives around is adventurous and legitimately energized. The dynamic camera work pairs with editing that’s snappy and perfectly paced, leaving just enough room to breathe between its exhilarating moments of prehistoric peril.
The End of Oak Street Is a Must-Watch Blockbuster
By its final scenes, Oak Street cements itself as a new favorite of the year. Big stars bringing bigger and more heartfelt performances, big budget effects that actually manage to wow you over and over, and a big entertainment value that reminds you of how even the simplest stories can generate a feeling of true adventure. The End of Oak Street is endlessly impressive and will revitalize even the most fatigued theatergoers this year.
