Connect with us

Film Fests

Brooklyn Horror Film Festival 2025: ‘Blood Shine’ Review

Published

on

I’ve been pretty clear for some time that cult-based horror isn’t my bag. Many subgenre tropes and cliches work well for me, but cult horror tropes do not. I can see how they work for some audiences, and I tend to flat-out stay away from them. Why watch a film in a subgenre that you don’t necessarily care for? But when I heard that Larry Fessenden was gracing the silver screen, I didn’t care what the subgenre was. I knew I would be seated with popcorn and a cola, ready to see whatever he’s up to. Plus, when one of the writers/directors of the film leads with, “We hope this fucks you up,” how can you not get excited? Little did I know I was about to witness a film with a scene so genuinely grotesque (and kind of hot) that it would make David Cronenberg blush. Thankfully, I was surprised by Blood Shine.

A Filmmaker’s Deadly Encounter

Brighton West (David Call) is a sleazy filmmaker on a deadline. Clara (Emily Bennett) is a secluded, religious nut with hopes of creating a new god. With a deadline approaching, Brighton decides to rent a cabin upstate to get some peace while working on his latest script. But a simple hike through the woods puts Brighton in Clara’s sights. Will Brighton get his just desserts? Or will Clara fail, yet again, at creating a god?

I think there will be a debate over whether Blood Shine is a film about cults. On one hand, it very much is. Larry Fessenden is the leader of this cult who spreads his word (and teachings) through a series of VHS tapes. On the other hand, it’s a film that examines the psyche of two very different people going through similar experiences: Clara and her attempt to come to terms with herself, and Brighton, who deserves little respect and, over his 26 days of torture, starts to realize it. The film’s main driving point is cult-forward. However, the majority of the film’s runtime is spent between Brighton and Clara. So, whether or not this is a cult film will depend on the viewer.

Fessenden and Bennett Give Standout Performances in Blood Shine

The performances in Blood Shine are stellar. Emily Bennett pulls incredible triple duty as co-writer, co-director, and lead. It’s hard enough to do one of those well, let alone three. She weaponizes her charm in the most deadly ways possible. Of course, Larry knocks it out of the park. As always. There’s a natural charisma behind Fessenden’s on-screen (and off) personas. Whether he has one line or a hundred, Fessenden continues to bring his A game. And for the time she’s on screen, Toby Poser does a great job of creating an incredibly creepy atmosphere. Though many of her films haven’t worked for me, I can’t help but admire how genuinely talented she is.

With Blood Shine being a film about emotional and physical torture, the question everyone should be asking is, “How are the practical effects?” Brian Spears (Smile 2, Bloody Axe Wound) does not play around. Spears’s SFX work is impeccable. From the simplest of knife wounds to that scene towards the end, Spears refuses to let the audience get a second of comfort. What’s seemingly becoming a lost art in the digital world, Spears gives a giant middle finger to anyone who thinks practical is dead.

Blood Shine Is a Cult Horror Movie Worth Watching

Would I say that Blood Shine changed my mind about cult horror? Not in a million years. Blood Shine is an outlier. Its emphasis on character and substance is something I find many films of its kind missing. Rather than being a film about a cult, it’s a film that exists around a cult. The only thing I would have asked for more of is to see a bit more of Clara’s torture of Brighton. We see a very solid amount, but it does become a lot of the same after a while. Even though it does become very samey, it’s still effective as hell. It’ll make me think twice before knocking on someone’s door if my car breaks down in the middle of nowhere.

Advertisement

One final note, I’d be remiss to not bring up how wonderful it was to see Brendan Sexton III on screen. It’s always a delight to see him, and I think this is the first time he and Larry Fessenden have reunited for a film (though not sharing screentime) since Session 9!

Brendan is an award-winning author and screenwriter rotting away in New Jersey. His hobbies include rain, slugs, and the endless search for The Mothman.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Film Fests

Fantastic Fest: ‘Ghost in the Cell’ Review

Published

on

If you’re not watching Indonesian horror, you’re missing out. The region is producing some of the craziest genre movies around right now, thanks in no small part to the efforts of writer-director Joko Anwar. His latest, Ghost in the Cell, which celebrated its North American premiere at Fantastic Fest 2026, combines everything we love about the filmmaker’s work—supernatural scares, inventive kills, and gnarly gore—along with a strong vein of comedy and political satire.

What is Ghost in the Cell About?

Ghost in the Cell centers around Dimas (Endy Arfian), a journalist whose life falls apart after he tries to run a story on corporate corruption and mysterious worker deaths. Wrongfully convicted of the horrific murder of his boss, Dimas finds himself with a one-way ticket to Cell Block C, where he quickly meets a colorful cast of prisoners—the good, the bad, and the seriously nasty. Among the good guys, there’s Anggoro (Abimana Aryasatya), who is constantly getting into trouble for defending fellow inmates, and Six (Yoga Pratama), who claims he can see people’s auras.

As if Dimas’ situation couldn’t get any worse, his arrival seems to trigger a series of brutal killings in the prison. Bodies are showing up mangled beyond recognition and displayed in positions that wouldn’t look out of place in Hannibal. It soon becomes clear that Dimas isn’t behind the murders, which begs the question: what did he bring in with him?

Anwar Embraces Horror-Comedy Whole-Heartedly

Prison is a scary place, and Anwar makes great use of the setting, with the action moving from the dingy showers where predators lurk to the bleak cellblock where inmates are at the mercy of their captors and the cafeteria where rival gangs eye each other up with ill intent.

But for all the human misery contained within the film, Ghost in the Cell is ultimately a horror-comedy, one that isn’t afraid to lean into broad slapstick and quippy dialogue when it wants to raise a chuckle. The tonal shifts can take a little while to adjust to, especially if your previous experience with Anwar comes from his more serious horror outings like Impetigore. This might be a problem if the film wasn’t actually funny, but Ghost in the Cell has enough laugh-out-loud moments to make you forget about any whiplash.

Advertisement

Ghost in the Cell Is a Genre-Bender to the Max

Comedy isn’t the only new flavor that Anwar has tossed into the mix. In Ghost in the Cell, dance sequences and martial-arts fight choreo sit side-by-side with some of the most extreme gore scenes seen outside a Terrifier movie in recent years. Then there’s the eerie way the spirit presents before it kills (trypophobia sufferers, beware) and the extensive critique of political corruption, power, and inequality. It’s an everything-and-the-kitchen-sink approach that shouldn’t work on paper, but under Anwar’s assured hand, it does.

It helps that for all the slapstick, the film lands a surprisingly earnest message, amplified by its vast ensemble cast. Dimas and Anggoro at times feel like main characters, but everyone in Ghost in the Cell has a big part to play, and that’s the point: in seemingly impossible circumstances, there’s strength in unity.

Ghost in the Cell Is an Endlessly Entertaining Blend of Goofiness, Heart, and Gore

If you’re looking for nonstop scares, you won’t find them in Ghost in the Cell. What you will find is a delightful blend of horror, comedy, and action that is apt to leave you grinning from ear to ear.

The film doesn’t skimp on the gore, throwing flesh and fluids at every surface. But it’s also charmingly goofy, with a cast that doesn’t take itself too seriously and a script that’s all too happy to devolve into a comedic dance scene when it feels like the spirit might strike. In every sense, Anwar is doing the most, and the end result is a film where there’s nary a dull moment in sight.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Film Fests

Fantastic Fest: ‘In a Violent Nature 2’ Review

Published

on

One of the great pleasures of attending Fantastic Fest is the ability to occasionally see movies that won’t be out for many months. That’s especially true with the Secret Screenings, which this year included a work-in-progress print of In a Violent Nature 2, a film that doesn’t even have a release date yet and made for a wildly entertaining midnight movie surprise.

While a few things may change between now and release, the cut shown at Fantastic Fest felt near-final. Here’s what you can look forward to when this sequel eventually slashes its way onto our screens.

Johnny Returns in In a Violent Nature 2

In a Violent Nature 2 picks up right where the action of its predecessor left off, while also introducing new aspects of the lore that slightly contradict or complicate what has already been established, a nod to the way that slasher sequels throw in new plot elements willy-nilly to suit their needs.

The second film centers on Alex (Lucas Nguyen), a quiet 14-year-old kid who misses the bus home from camp because his bullies have stuffed him in a trunk. Since his older sister works at the camp, he gets to hang out for the night while the counselors celebrate the end of the season. Unfortunately, an old fireman’s whistle has drawn the mute, hulking Johnny (Ry Barrett) to the camp—and before long, their night of revelry has turned into one of unimaginable horror.

Less Walking, More Killing

Chris Nash, who wrote and directed the first film, handles scripting duties this time around, with Nate Wilson—who served as first assistant director on the original—stepping into the director role. It feels as though Nash may have listened to viewers’ complaints about how much walking was in the original, because In a Violent Nature 2 takes a break from following Johnny on his lumbering mission. Instead, the camera largely chases Alex through the woods as he runs, trips, and stumbles away from the carnage.

Advertisement

This change is a mixed bag. Alex may be more a dynamic figure to follow overall, but he also makes some frustratingly poor choices, and his teenage moodiness makes him a little unlikeable. The first film also succeeded, in part, because it consciously played into how audiences consume slasher movies, with their sympathies shifting from cheering on the killer to rooting for the final girl when she triumphantly emerges. In a Violent Nature 2 feels like less of a meta-commentary on the slasher genre, though it still has plenty to offer fans of the genre, especially when it comes to kills.

In a Violent Nature 2 Takes the Gore to a Whole New Level

Mention In a Violent Nature to a horror fan and they’ll probably bring up the yoga kill within 10 seconds. For the sequel, Nash and Wilson attempt to up the ante—no small feat considering just how violent the first film was. It’s hard to top that particular kill, but In a Violent Nature 2 certainly gives it the old college try.

Shifting the focus from a single group of friends to an entire summer camp, even one that’s emptying out, instantly ups the potential body count (and harkens back to the slasher films of yore). Counsellors are slaughtered in droves, in ways more brutal than anything seen in the original film, with a few kills in particular sure to get people talking. It’s a real treat for fans of practical effects, and it’s great to see that even horror films positioning themselves as more “elevated” than the typical fare can have fun and get their hands bloody.

A Possible Set up for Another Sequel?

Minor spoilers ahead.

In a Violent Nature 2 feels like something of a response to the reception of the first film, removing what people didn’t like and piling on more of what they did. The result is a movie that feels a little less focused and meditative than its predecessor, but still incredibly fun. And with a third film heavily teased in the final minutes, it seems like we’ll be seeing more of Johnny in the near future. Based on the trajectory of other slashers, can we expect to see him fighting a psychic child next? Or—dare we dream—is he preparing for a trip to space?

Advertisement

Only time will tell. Better lace up your walking shoes.

When Does In a Violent Nature 2 Come Out?

In a Violent Nature 2 is slated to hit theaters sometime in 2026. Keep an eye on IFC Films and Shudder’s socials for more release information as it becomes available.

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria