Connect with us

Reviews

‘Sorority Row’ Review: An Underrated Remake from 2009

Published

on

We talk about aughts remakes A LOT. Many of these films are being reappraised as not as bad as we originally said they were. Those of us who grew up with the brash, hyper-violent remakes of 1970s and 1980s horror films didn’t realize how fortunate we were. A modern perspective reveals these films’ deeper horrors, reflecting America’s anxieties through themes of xenophobia and post-9/11 fears. One such remake reintroduced an overlooked 1980s gem to new audiences. Much like its source material, Sorority Row didn’t get the love it deserved in its time. And it still doesn’t get discussed as much as it should!

Sorority Row: A Deadly Prank Gone Wrong

The Theta Pi sisters, Chugs (Margo Harshman), Claire (Jamie Chung), Ellie (Rumer Willis), and Jessica (Leah Pipes), decide to play a prank on Garrett (Matt O’Leary). With the help of Theta Pi’s Megan (Audrina Patridge), they get Garrett to believe she ODs while hooking up. Cassidy (Briana Evigan) gets roped into the prank. Unfortunately, the prank turns deadly for everyone. CUT TO: the end of the school year. As the sorority sisters prepare to graduate, a hooded figure prepares to kill them off one by one.

Sorority Row starts off strong with a well-choreographed one-shot through a bumping house party. It’s hard not to appreciate how quickly Sorority Row gets into the action. It starts off at an 11, brings you down to a safe baseline, and then slowly ramps itself back up to a memorable finisher. It toes the line between its satirical look at Greek life, with some very dark moments of comedy, as well as being a very effective slasher film. Sorority Row would be the first foray into horror for writers Josh Stolberg and Peter Goldfinger. While Stolberg had reasonable success with some comedies at the start of his career, he hit his stride writing Sorority Row with Goldfinger.

Nostalgia and the Aughts Aesthetic in Sorority Row

For some reason, I had never gotten around to watching this film at the time. Sorority Row is one of the films I would see the cover of constantly at Blockbuster. Something about the hooded man on the cover with a tire iron struck fear into my 15-year-old heart. Finally getting around to this film made that 15-year wait worth it. One of the most charming aspects of Sorority Row is its aughts-style aesthetic, which feels like the anti-piracy video we all know and love. If you ever find yourself yearning for that feel, this film will scratch that itch.

Sorority Row’s biggest upgrade to this remake is the killer’s weapon. The cane from The House on Sorority Row is fun and effective, but it’s not the most memorable. One prong is blunt, one is a two-pronged fork, one has an arrowhead shape, and one is a straight-up butcher knife. This weapon leads to some gloriously brutal kills. By the end, it did feel a kill or two too short, but we do have a few wonderfully inventive kills. Where the film stumbles is in its reveal…well, reveals. There’s a fake reveal that is technically a fake reveal, and then there’s the real reveal that leaves you wondering who killed who? It’s a bit messy, but it works for me.

Advertisement

Why Sorority Row Deserves a Sequel and More Love

Hopefully, with this impending sequel, we can get the tire iron back on the big screen! I really can’t believe there isn’t Fright Rags or Cavity Colors apparel, or at least a Scream Factory rerelease. Sorority Row is a quirky piece of mid-to-late-aughts art that serves as a wonderfully gory exclamation mark at the end of a decade. It’s a film that knows what it wants to be and doesn’t attempt to be anything more. More filmmakers should take notes.

Brendan is an award-winning author and screenwriter rotting away in New Jersey. His hobbies include rain, slugs, and the endless search for The Mothman.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

‘The Belko Experiment’ Review: A Wasted Workplace Horror Movie

Published

on

There are countless subgenres within subgenres for horror, and one that feels underutilized is workplace horror. Unless you’re one of the lucky few, most people wake up at some point during the day, go to work, and then come home. It’s one of the few things in life that’s nearly unavoidable. While there are countless real-life examples of workplace violence, seeing exaggerated forms of it in film can still be fun. When I pitched covering The Belko Experiment for this month, I actually thought I was pitching Joe Lynch’s Mayhem. I soon found out how incorrect I had been, but figured I’d go along with it anyway.

Mike Milch (John Gallagher Jr.) and 79 of his coworkers are locked inside the towering building they come to work in every day in Bogotá, Colombia. They’re given simple instructions: murder two coworkers within the next half hour. When they fail that task, coworkers’ heads start blowing up left and right. When they’re given the next task, kill 30 people in two hours, they take it…a little more seriously.

The Belko Experiment’s Brutal Premise Sets Up High Stakes

Written by James Gunn and directed by Wolf Creek creator Greg McLean, The Belko Experiment is a painfully by-the-numbers film that offers little more than a handful of entertaining kills. Its futile attempts at commentary regarding work/life balance or just how bad “faceless” upper management is fall so flat it’s comical. Nothing like multi-millionaire James Gunn telling me how awful it is to have to work a real job for a living. Great work. And its one-dimensional characters do little more than create a slight sigh of relief when they’re dispatched without regard.

A singular attempt at cleverness is broached from the beginning when we see a colony of ants in an ant farm on someone’s desk. Oh, look at that, these workers are nothing more than mindless ants! But any attempt at following that slightly clever idea is quickly thrown away. At one point, Barry Norris (Tony Goldwyn), the big boss in the office, attempts to group up who should and shouldn’t be killed; who has the most value outside of work. Gunn had the perfect opportunity to make Barry a deep and more sinister antagonist. If Barry had grouped people into sets from most to least profitable for the company, we would have something. It would show that Barry is a forward-thinking villain who is trying to suck up to the people who get paid even MORE than him!

Missed Opportunities for a Smarter Corporate Villain

I’ll do you one better. After all of that, what if the bad guys that Barry recruited to help him cull his subordinates realized they were just pawns in the game of Big Business? So then they attempt to repent by killing Barry in the hopes that they can find a common means of escape from this hell? Why is there zero attempt at making an interesting story other than this shitty, watered-down Battle Royale with people we don’t give a shit about? Instead of anything interesting, we’re just given a group of baddies who try to get into the security office’s gun safe. The only reason we’re slightly scared of the “bad guys” is because they’re bad guys.

Advertisement

The only slightly interesting performances we get are from David Dastmalchian and Adria Arjona, even if it might be a fluke. As someone who is a fan of Greg McLean and the Wolf Creek series, something just felt disconnected about nearly every aspect of The Belko Experiment. I’ve brought it up before that sometimes it’s okay to have a film that doesn’t tell a great story as long as the kills can carry some of the weight. But to say this film has a story is laughable, and that carries over to how flat this film looks.

Skip The Belko Experiment and Watch Mayhem Instead

It’s weird how sour this film left me. When I was watching it, I found myself grimacing at some of the kills. And I didn’t vehemently dislike it as much as this review would suggest. But as I sat there and thought longer, I just couldn’t wrap my head around what anyone sees in this. Mayhem is an all-around better film that tackles this same subject but in a much better way. So if you ever decide to sit down and watch The Belko Experiment, maybe go watch Mayhem on Shudder instead.

Continue Reading

Reviews

The Hitcher (2007) Review: This Remake Deserves a Second Look

Published

on

Would it be a month of coverage on Horror Press if I didn’t bring up at least one aughts film? I know the curator of all things Horror Press, James-Michael, is shaking his fists at the sky and cursing the fact that he approved me covering The Hitcher. Of all the remakes that were so pervasive throughout the aughts, The Hitcher is one that slipped completely under my radar. And that’s a damn shame. It wouldn’t be until I found a DVD copy at Bookoff that I finally got the opportunity to watch it. Hot damn, the critics really got it wrong here.

The Hitcher: A Road Trip Turned Nightmare

Jim Halsey (Zachary Knighton) and his girlfriend Grace Andrews (Sophia Bush) are on a road trip to Lake Havasu in Jim’s gorgeous Oldsmobile 442. An unfortunate run-in with a mysterious hitchhiker, John Ryder (Sean Bean), Jim and Grace find themselves in a fight for life and death. Only, John isn’t their only concern. With the 5-0 hot on their tails, Jim and Grace must escape from a psychopathic man with a death wish and the hot-tempered, hot-faced Lieutenant Esteridge (Neal McDonough). As the odometer grows, so does the body count.

The Hitcher is one of those remakes that does not have the approval of the original’s lead, Rutger Hauer. Which is astounding to me. Sure, the original is good. But it doesn’t set itself apart from the crowd too much. Rutger Hauer’s John is slightly more reserved, and while he has an edge to him, I don’t necessarily find him overly menacing. (Don’t kill me.) Sean Bean’s John Ryder, on the other hand, is furiously terrifying. There’s no question that there are tons of issues with the Platinum Dunes remake, though, for me, the pros significantly outweigh the cons.

Jim Halsey Falls Flat

The biggest issue is the character of Jim Halsey. I love how the roles of Jim and Grace are swapped from the original film. It brings an updated, modern edge to the film and is a great way to throw audiences who have seen the original. Though I can imagine the hyper-masculine fans of the original were not too happy with that. When it was decided to swap the roles of the characters, it seems like any character depth for Jim was thrown out of the window. I think Zachary Knighton is a wonderful actor who does the best with what he has, but he doesn’t have enough to work with. Writers Eric Red, Jake Wade Wall, and Eric Bernt updated the film with tons of epic scenarios and moments, while seemingly forgetting to make the supposed lead of the film interesting.

On top of cardboard Jim, the inciting police incident just feels very forced. Grace runs into a diner, covered in blood, after she and Jim found a family butchered by John. Someone from the diner calls the police, which leads to Jim and Grace being arrested and charged with murder. Whether or not that’s supposed to be commentary on rural police doesn’t matter because it completely fails to do anything other than forcibly push the story forward.

Advertisement

Besides that? I hate to say, but I don’t have many issues with The Hitcher.

Soundtrack and Atmosphere: A High-Octane Experience

First and foremost, The Hitcher’s soundtrack is incredible. We start the film with Move Along by The All-American Rejects. Talk about a shot of adrenaline. And the greatest needle drop in all of aughts horror history is Nine Inch Nails’s Closer during the film’s most wild car chase. It’s hard not to get lost in this film when the music kicks in.

What really sells this film is how intensely they handle the violence and the film’s gorgeous chase scenes. It’s no Death Proof, but these scenes are miles above the Fast movies that were out at this time. In a day and age where chase scenes are overly produced, badly edited, and just plain boring, The Hitcher manages to infuse horror and action in a way that probably won’t be seen again. Watching films like The Hitcher makes me sad for the state of modern cinema. The Hitcher wasn’t made to win scores of Oscars; it was made by people passionate about telling a badass, harrowing story (minus Jim). And they greatly excel at that.

The Hitcher Is a Misunderstood Cult Favorite

The Hitcher falls in line with my running theory of post-9/11 ultra violence. We were a nation scared of what happened, what was happening, and what seemed to be on the horizon–The Hitcher bottles that fear and anger, packaging it into a nasty piece of genre. Sean Bean and Sophia Bush are an on-screen match made in heaven. They wade through harsh lighting, thick film grain, and buckets of blood to deliver a film that critics and audiences unfairly panned. While audiences may have moved along, I sure didn’t. I want to exist in a world of nothing but aughts genre films, but am forced to live in a world of elevated horror. Le sigh.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria