Connect with us

Misc

P-TOWN AND BLOOD: An Interview with Monster Makeup LLC on Making Horror—And Their Next Film, ‘Queen of the Rats’

Published

on

Since even before I started writing for Horror Press, I’ve wanted to get a peek behind the curtain on how horror movie productions are made. Not just the films themselves, but the people.

How do you get the perfect storm of people to assemble and film a slasher? 

How do practical effects creature features get all of their most important moving parts, the cast and crew, in place? 

And with so many people with their own artistic vision, how do they keep from tearing each other’s heads off? 

Today, I got those questions answered by the wonderful Monster Makeup LLC, the queer horror film collective that brought you Death Drop Gorgeous and their newest feature Saint Drogo

Advertisement

What did they say about making these ventures, and their latest feature Queen of the Rats? Venture deeper, intrepid reader…

Pictured from left to right: Brandon Perras-Sanchez, Ryan Miller, and Michael J. Ahern

Just want to start off by saying, I saw Saint Drogo, and I enjoyed it a lot. Perfectly evokes all the vibes critics say it does, and that finale is gut-wrenching. Excellent stuff, and congrats on realizing that vision. 

Michael J. Ahern: Thank you so much!

Christopher Dalpe: That’s awesome! Thank you.

Wayne Gonsalves: Hail, Saint Drogo.

The second thing I wanted to say was, all I could think about after I saw the climax of Saint Drogo was “Imagine just being in the area that day and seeing this crew off in the distance filming THAT”. Your effects are insane, has anybody ever stumbled across you guys shooting these scenes or preparing the effects and just lost it?

Advertisement

Brandon Perras-Sanchez: We had this weird curse placed upon us where no matter how far into the wintry wilderness or national shoreline we would travel, there would always be at least one person lingering around. We were filming the SFX heavy finale with Joe Castro on an extremely windy and freezing beach. Along with these harsh winter conditions, the tide was coming very close to washing away our props and equipment, so we had to relocate everything to the parking lot and film it there. While we were setting up, this group of four, very curious, and intrusive adults started hovering around us. We were polite at first and let them watch, but since we only had one take and opportunity to get this specific shot. Things were intense. One of the nosy spectators kept touching the makeup of one of our actors and asking really stupid questions. Her other friends were right next to us and trying to start conversations while we were about to shoot. We finally gave them the cold shoulder and they eventually got the hint, but I was ready to use one, if not all of them as actual props.

Kevin Bowden: We tried getting film permits so we could shoot in peace, but the film commission never responded so we were at the mercy of tourists coming up to us while shooting. It didn’t help that American Horror Story was also in town shooting so people thought we were part of that production.

Pictured from left to right: Brandon Perras-Sanchez and Michael J. Ahern

Speaking of insane practical effects, the grinder scene from Death Drop Gorgeous is incredible. It felt like the spiritual brother of that very over-the-top “explosion” scene from Frankenhooker and seemed super Henenlotter inspired which is something I love. We need to know, who thought of that for the kill?

BPS: It was from my cesspool of a brain. I am terrified of glory holes and am amazed that someone could just voluntarily put their dick through one without caring about what’s on the other side. We also were very adamant about trying to create kills people hadn’t seen which made my imagination run wild. I probably need to start taking multivitamins again.

CD: This is the kill that started it all really! In the early days, before Monster Makeup was founded, before DDG was even a script, Brandon and I were geeking out and riffing on how we’d love to see a good gay slasher – one that exploited the hook-up culture and sketchy red-flag scenarios that Queers find themselves in commonly. Glory hole, meat grinder…it felt natural.

I’ve been hyping Saint Drogo up to my friends who are gore hounds. To give people who haven’t seen it yet an idea: how much fake blood did you guys end up using in that finale over the course of however many takes it took to get it right?

Advertisement

BPS: When Joe Castro landed in Rhode Island, we immediately went to our house and made a couple of gallons using his secret recipe and at different consistencies, one was watery and one thicker for better drippage. For some reshoots, we bought 2 or 3 more gallons because filming blood is always a crapshoot on how it’s going to splatter or flow and look on camera. Each gore scene took about 2-4 takes, we used every drop we had.

MJA: The finale was shot, I think, four different times in three different locations: twice on location at Longnook Beach, once in the Rhode Island desert (a very strange, former quarry in the state), and once in our backyard.

Pictured from top left to right: Michael J. Ahern, Chris Dalpe, Brandon Perras-Sanchez, and Ryan Miller. Pictured from bottom left to middle: Kevin Bowden and Wayne Gonsalves.

Now let’s talk more about Monster Makeup as a group. I wanted to ask how you guys formed, how did you all come together? When did you really realize “Oh this is the team we want, we’re going to do this”? Was there a moment where it clicked, or did you just hit the ground running?

BPS: I met Chris through his sister, another horror fiend, and author, Victoria Dalpe, when I first moved to Providence in 2003. Years later, the three of us were joking about how the gay sex apps could also function as a tool for serial killers, because horny men will skip red flags to get off. A year later, I befriended Mike and told him about this and he said “Let’s make it into a movie!” Next we had a group meeting at a local bar with my boyfriend, Ryan, and one of my best friends, Wayne, and we started formulating a story, which eventually morphed into a screenplay, which eventually became DDG. Each of us brings something unique to the table which is crucial for a team to function.

WG: Brandon and I had known each other for over 10 years at that point, and he was filling me in on these crazy meetings that he was having with Chris and Mike. Chris and I had known each other for a few years, but I was recently introduced to Mike, who was writing plot points for the movie that were scarily reminiscent of things I had experienced or thought, so it was like I had known Mike for years.

MJA: I don’t know if there was a specific “click” but I think with Death Drop Gorgeous, the momentum kept rolling until it was like “oh, I guess we’re doing this!” And then it got to a point where we couldn’t keep referring to ourselves as “the Death Drop boys” and we wanted to formally name ourselves.

Advertisement

CD: Monster Makeup, the formal company, erupted from the ground like a limp-wristed zombie, hand sprung from the grave. We are a bunch of friends, who love horror, music, gore, and GOOD stories. We looked around and said, ‘fuck it, let’s do it ourselves.’ It’s the Captain Planet – “with our powers combined” attitude that I truly believe any amount of success derives from. Now, growing pains happen, of course, but there have been consistent core tenements that we’ve lived by: “Is it horror?” “Is it queer?” And “What are you doing on Sunday?”

Ryan Miller: Brandon and I have been together for about 12 years, so I was around when he and Chris first had the idea for the DDG story. They soon roped Mike into the group due to his excellent writing skills, as well as Wayne who Brandon had been friends with for years. At that point, I had zero background in film, but as I sat around a whiskey-fueled table listening to these guys come up with absurd, hilarious characters and scenes, I immediately knew I wanted to be a part of the process. As a group, we pretty much did collectively say, “Fuck it, let’s do it!” and learned as we went along. I tend to be much more cautious when it comes to dipping my toes into the unknown, so I’m thankful that they had the initiative and punk rock attitude to jump right in and make shit happen. The rest is history!

KB: I came in super late in the Death Drop Gorgeous production. My girlfriend saw that a local slasher needed music so I reached out to them and sent some music I had already produced under the name Limmazene. I believe Ryan asked me if I could score a scene from scratch and the first scene I received was the glory hole kill. I must’ve watched it 100 times laughing my ass off at how awesome it was. I called my girlfriend into the room, “You’ve gotta see this!” I think I scored many scenes before I even met the boys in person. One night Brandon and Ryan picked me up to watch the final cut at their place. It was dark and snowing, and their apartment was dark too. I didn’t even know Brandon was Tony Two Fingers until weeks later because I hadn’t actually seen his face. A month or two later Brandon texted me about my photography and asked if I could meet them for a drink, and that’s when they asked if I wanted to shoot Saint Drogo. I think I said yes before he finished the sentence.

Saint Drogo is a folk horror film, and I always find the subgenre interesting in the context of sharing small-scale stories, these frightening folktales, and spreading them to the world at large, to the global village that is filmgoers. So why was Saint Drogo the saint of choice for telling that sort of story to everybody, what compelled you guys to choose him of all the saints? 

RM:  From the beginning, we knew we wanted to draw on elements of religion—in this case Catholicism—to highlight the very similar social pressures that exist within the gay community. We all experience the need to belong to something larger, to find our place among our people, and to feel a sense of conviction and purpose. One day, I was browsing a catalog of Catholic saints and their patronages, and I came across Saint Drogo. At first glance, his domain seems to be eclectic and scattered; he’s attributed as the patron saint of unattractive people, the disfigured, the deaf, shepherds, and coffee (among other things). However, if you zoom in on the social aspects, the common thread seems to be that they are outcasts, those that would be ostracized from mainstream society. It’s this feature that initially caught my eye—the comparison to the marginalization that gay people have experienced in modern culture, and the way that cult-like forces might prey upon this to lure others into their fold. There are also other fun references to the Saint Drogo legend that pop up in the film, such as his reported ability to bilocate, his own disfigurement, and the burning of his church cell.

Advertisement

BPS: Saints have such interesting and morbid trajectories towards their canonization, so there is a lot to play with there. We also wanted to make sure we found a saint whose patronage paralleled the themes of the film. Aside from embodying our themes, he was also described as having some sort of growth/deformity on his abdomen and had to hide himself in the basement of a church because his appearance was so jarring. His story is tragic but one that was a perfect vehicle for our cautionary tale.

Pictured from left to right: Michael J. Ahern, Wayne Gonsalves, and Mike Rigney.

Could you tell me a bit about the changes going from Death Drop Gorgeous into making Saint Drogo? Since they are very different films, tonally and aesthetically, what’s the most glaring difference that comes to mind jumping from Death Drop Gorgeous to Saint Drogo? How has the process changed for you the most over that time, and going into these new projects?

MJA: Saint Drogo, for me, felt like we had something to prove. During Death Drop Gorgeous, so much of it was learning as we were going, and there is a micro-budget charm that I think lends itself to the DIY energy of the film. So, for Drogo, I think we wanted to showcase what we learned from shooting DDG, and the growth we experienced as filmmakers and storytellers. Sometimes it’s crazy for me to recall that I was 25 when I started writing DDG with these guys, and I’m now 32. We also didn’t want to pigeonhole ourselves to a specific kind of horror, and we wanted to make something unsettling and unnerving to challenge ourselves. I feel like it would’ve been the easier route to write another comedy horror.

BPS: As far as similarities, being such a small crew, we wore a ton of hats. Saint Drogo was filmed during COVID, which forced us to have an even smaller cast and crew. Our dream is to eventually have enough staff that we can walk onto set and are only responsible for a single task instead of four or five. Adding Kevin Bowden as our cameraman lifted such a huge weight off of us and we cannot wait to have him on board for our third feature.

As far as differences go, the original DDG script was 140 pages. We learned the hard way that horror scripts are generally around 90 pages; whittling that down was a nightmare that none of us want to endure ever again. When writing Drogo, we wanted to make it as streamlined and succinct as possible. A friend of ours told us that Cronenberg will keep his screenplays at 60ish pages, and we implemented this tip when writing SD, knowing that it would be a more visual, brooding, and tense film. We also wrote the script for our third around the same time, and we kept the same mantra of “neat and tidy.”

CD: From its inception to the big screen- Death Drop Gorgeous was brutal, messy, over the top, ambitious, and hilarious. We barreled into DDG unapologetic and fiercely. This was the first time for many of us working on this kind of scale, and we may have taken the long road to get there, but we discovered and learned so much on the way.

Advertisement

To me, Saint Drogo is a culmination of a lot of those lessons learned. Shorter, cleaner script. Smaller cast. Wildly different and obviously a harsher story but DDG & SD are sister films with a lot to say about identity in the queer community.

RM: From a technical standpoint, one of the biggest differences between the films is the equipment we used. When we started Death Drop Gorgeous, it was a passion project, and we were more interested in the story and vision than the technical specs. There’s definitely some great cinematography, but we shot in HD on an older Canon and learned the best settings as we went along. When we started Saint Drogo, our friend Kevin Bowden, came on board with a Nikon Z6, a BlackMagic drone, and better lenses. This allowed us to shoot in 4K, which forced us to pay much more attention to things like focus, aperture, etc. Following the success of DDG and what we learned in the process, we approached this film with a bit more intention from the very beginning and wanted to make it look as good as possible. The fact that it was shot in a beautiful seaside town in the offseason definitely didn’t hurt, either. Because our script for Saint Drogo was much shorter, it also allowed us to let the visuals breathe and spend more time creating an immersive atmosphere.

Recently, you said your next film was going to be Queen of the Rats, and that it’s going to be a middle point of sorts between Death Drop Gorgeous and Saint Drogo. Which…I don’t even know how to visualize that, but I am excited. Can you give us a little peak of insight into that film, and the creative process of striking that balance?

BPS: When brainstorming ideas for our next film, Chris mentioned Lovecraft and the mafia. I ran with this idea and fleshed out a skeleton and brought it to the crew. And like Uncle Frank coming out of the floor in Hellraiser, the Monsters worked their magic and started adding meat to the bones and before we knew it, we had an amazing script. Mike is our primary dialogue guy/screenwriter, and I think this is his best work. 

CD: It’ll be another love letter to Providence!

Advertisement

MJA: We actually wrote Queen of the Rats before Saint Drogo during the summer months of the pandemic. It’s this amalgamation of so many things we all love and it bizarrely works seamlessly. We are sort of describing it as Green Room meets The Sopranos meets Lovecraftian cosmic horror, and it takes place during the early 2000s in the Providence noise rock scene, which was lowkey the Golden Age of Providence. It’s implicitly queer, but that’s a little less the focus this time around for us. We’re playing with themes of greed, gentrification, and community, which I think shares some commonalities with our previous two films.

Pictured: Brandon Perras-Sanchez and Michael J. Ahern. Crew pictured: Kevin Bowden and Ryan Miller.

Is there anything you can tell us about what Queen of the Rats is exactly about, or about the main villain? Will it be a creature, or are we going for something more grounded? What can we expect from it?

WG: Should we spoil the surprise?

MJA: There’s a creature!

BPS: I can tell you it’s going to be a wild one! In a nutshell, it’s about the early 00’s warehouse scene in Providence, RI which was a utopia of artists, musicians, performers, you name it. Weirdly enough, there was a symbiosis between this scene and the mafia (yes, this factual). Toss in a Lovecraftian monster, a noise rock band, and some mafia drama, and you have QotR. Expect our usual level of gore but tenfold, an even balance of humor and darkness, and a lot of familiar faces.

Malfunctions on set, they’re part of filmmaking. They’re inevitable, and sometimes they’re happy accidents. When it comes to practicals as involved as yours, the makeup, what’s the most memorable on-set special effects catastrophe that has happened to you? If you haven’t had one was there ever a concern like that, about a big bloody explosion or something just not coming out looking right?

Advertisement

BPS: The worst one was when we were filming the opening kill in DDG with the poisoned cocaine. I had made an appliance out of paper towels, latex, and acrylic teeth. We wanted to create the illusion of his nose and upper lip dissolving so we had the actor fill his mouth with fake blood and tossed in a couple Alka-Seltzers. So Mike Murphy, the actor, “dies” and starts drooling out the foamy blood and then starts saying “Hey guys, this is burning my face.” We ran over and washed all the gore off and removed the appliance. Apparently, latex and Alka-Seltzer have an adverse reaction. He ended up actually dying an hour later, but as Kevin our cameraman would say, “That’s showbiz!”

Just kidding! Mike is alive and well.

Another scary moment was between me and Ninny Nothin (Young Gloria) during the scene where she guts Tony with the electric meat carver. So, I’m wearing the silicone stomach that Victoria Elizabeth Black created which was loaded with intestines, blood and slime. We originally had a piece of plexiglass that was slid in between my actual stomach and the prosthetic. It wasn’t looking good on camera, so we decided to nix the plexi and go commando. We informed Ninny: “Don’t go in too deep!” This made her extremely nervous, and it took some convincing, but she said she’d do it. Was I terrified? Holy fuck yes, but if you’re not going to bleed for your art then what the fuck are you even doing? Luckily, I wasn’t disemboweled, and Ninny wasn’t charged with manslaughter.

RM: I second all of the above. I’ll just add that during Tony’s gutting, Brandon was also extensively wrapped in Christmas lights, so now we have live electric wires, liquid blood, and a crazed drag queen with a turkey carver carefully trying to avoid said wires. I was a nervous wreck behind the camera for most of the scene.

WG: I really hit Audrey Heartburn’s (Ava Unit) head on the vanity in Death Drop Gorgeous. It’s in the bloopers on the Death Drop Gorgeous DVD.

Advertisement

MJA: Shooting the climax of Saint Drogo felt like one big catastrophe. The weather was not cooperating, hightide was insane. The rock at the end of the movie actually washed out to sea, and we had to go in and grab it before it floated away.

Pictured from left to right: Brandon Perras-Sanchez, Mike Rigney, and Katerina Pederson.

We all watch the classics, Carpenter’s essential works, and the movies that legends like Tom Savini and Screaming Mad George have worked on for great special effects. What are some obscure practical effects movies you think most people don’t know about that they should watch?   What’s a lesser-known must-watch for you?

BPS: The Demon’s Rook! There’s an interesting and adorable story behind this movie too – required viewing. Also for all you gore hounds, any Brian Paulin and James Bell films are all barf-inducing, and they both do all the SFX themselves. Others I love: The Dead Next Door, Black Past, Nikos the Impaler, Violent Shit, Deadly Spawn, Street Trash, The Kindred, Xtro, Basket Case 2 and 3, The Church, Demon Wind, Little Necro Red, The Burning Moon, Beyond The Black Rainbow, Warlock 1 and 2, Laid To Rest.

CD: Oh! We just did a TikTok about this. Personally, I love how unhinged and insane the special effects are in the 80’s remake of The Blob – skin dissolving, acid burning, and goo; every kill is so over the top.

@monstermakeup8 Tell us about your favorite greusome practical effects! #monstermakeupllc #monstermakeup #gore #horror #horrormovie #horrormovies #sfx #deathdropgorgeous #saintdrogo #joecastro #unwound #alien #societymovie #tenebre #suspiria #hellraiser ♬ Demons Sing Love Songs – Unwound

Daydream with me a bit. No reins, no questions asked, just unlimited funding, whatever you need to make it. What kind of effects would you have if you had that? Are there any dream projects where you would just need an unfeasible crazy amount of money to realize a creature or a concept?

MJA: One of my favorite genres, if not my favorite, is fantasy horror. Pan’s Labyrinth is probably my favorite movie next to Lord of the Rings. I’d love to create a fantasy horror epic with some amazing creature designs.

Advertisement

CD: Hauntings and demonic possessions! I love that shit, but I’d love to tell it from a very Monster Makeup perspective. A car chase. Head explosions. A hoard of monsters crawls out from the ground. Underwater monsters. Something in space. I’d love to do it all.

BPS: This Pandora’s Box of a question! And all of these answers will involve HEAVY practical effects. My current dream project is Queen of the Rats. I have two other screenplays that I have novelized, The White Bishop (a period piece, nautical, body horror, novelized with the help of Splatterpunk terrorist Aron Beauregard) and recessive NATURE (a horror fantasy that takes place in the 80’s with a lot of folklorish creatures and monsters.) Both would need a hefty budget (these books will be available soon!) I would also LOVE to remake Neon Maniacs, Curtains, or Spookies.

​​RM: I’ve always loved monsters that incorporate human bodies and appendages into themselves, such as the disgusting orgy mass in Society (1992) and the ravenous alien parasite in Slither (2006). I’d love to be a part of creating insane special effects like that—in fact, we already have some related ideas, so if there are any sugar daddies listening out there, please give us money!

WG: I’d really like to get thrown through a glass window.

***

Advertisement

And there you have it folks! It was lovely getting to know Monster Makeup LLC, and I hope you all got to learn a little something about your new favorite indie horror team. For more interviews like these, follow us on social media to keep up with Horror Press.

For those hoping to see more Monster Makeup LLC, they’ll be showing Saint Drogo at Denver Film’s CinemaQ (get tickets here!) Friday, August 11th,  as they begin the festival circuit run of their movie.

Hail, Saint Drogo!

Luis Pomales-Diaz is a freelance writer and lover of fantasy, sci-fi, and of course, horror. When he isn't working on a new article or short story, he can usually be found watching schlocky movies and forgotten television shows.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Misc

HORROR 101: What is The New French Extremity Movement?

What is New French Extremity? The term New French Extremity originated in film journalist James Quandt’s article “Flesh & Blood: Sex and Violence in Recent French Cinema”. The bulk of the article addresses a rash of more violent films that were coming out of French cinema in the late 90s and early 2000s; the article sites Bruno Dumont’s 2003 art film Twentynine Palms as inciting the criticism, seeing it as the latest in a long line of, to him, unimpressive French films at the turning point of a century.

Published

on

Welcome back to Horror 101, a series of articles where we explain horror movie legends and their lore. For beginners, the confused, or just those who need a refresher, these articles are for you.

It is certainly ironic to be close-minded as a horror fan. What do you mean you’ll watch fifteen terribly made movies in a week but then turn your nose up at something 20 minutes longer than your usual runtime? (That one was aimed at me, so if you caught a stray, apologia).

But, I’ve always been particularly averse to one grouping of films: New French Extremity, a genre whose name came from an article deriding the very notion of it. In more recent years, I’ve grown some appreciation for its offerings, though, as I’ve come to understand the commentary it has to share. It’s a genre pockmarked by bleak cinematic landscapes, painted with the pains of human suffering and grotesqueries to reflect the horrors of the real world. A genre that often delves into the surreal, wading knee-high through depravity to get there.

…Assuming you can call it a genre.

Like German Expressionism, or Dadaism, it’s a style with some major tenets, but no concrete trappings; debated and shaped by its watchers, and now brought to you here. It’s sometimes hard to grasp, but today’s article will try its hardest to answer the question…  

Advertisement

WHAT IS NEW FRENCH EXTREMITY?

The term New French Extremity originated in film journalist James Quandt’s article “Flesh & Blood: Sex and Violence in Recent French Cinema”. The bulk of the article addresses a rash of more violent films that were coming out of French cinema in the late 90s and early 2000s; the article sites Bruno Dumont’s 2003 art film Twentynine Palms as inciting the criticism, seeing it as the latest in a long line of, to him, unimpressive French films at the turning point of a century.

Quandt generally writes them off, indicating that they utilize their debauchery as a blunt tool in a clumsy attempt to evoke some sort of philosophical or political message about the human condition, as opposed to the artistic movements of centuries prior like the French Decadent Movement and Dadaism that inspired it. Ironically, the term New French Extremity erupted from this article as the main takeaway for film scholars and critics, because Quandt caps off the article by saying that the grouping of films are too varied in their vision to be considered a proper genre:

The New French Extremity sometimes looks like a latter-day version of the hussards, those Céline-loving, right-wing anarchists of the ’50s determined to rock the pieties of bourgeois culture; but for all their connections (shared actors, screenwriters, etc.), the recent provocateurs are too disparate in purpose and vision to be classified as a movement. […] it appears to be the last gasp of Gallic libertinism.

And so, New French Extremity was minted as a piece of the cinematic lexicon. Jargon meant to describe not only grotesque thriller and horror films coming out of France from the 90s onward, but films whose whole cinematography (both by visuals and by narrative) is rooted in being transgressive. No matter how horrible you think a concept is, New French Extreme will depict it, and no matter how sacred you think something is, expect it to be trampled on with some extremely profane filmmaking. It’s about being so grotesque that they evoke raw and pure disgust, often to reflect the film’s themes or philosophical ideas. 

Then, you might ask…

Advertisement

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NEW FRENCH EXTREMITY AND SPLATTER FILMS?

Surely, films like Saw, Hostel, and Human Centipede have political messages underpinned by their violence. And yes, the Saw franchise in particular can at turns be very meanspirited and violent while being bluntly political; it is what I’d call the most politically American horror film series of all time, and its traps and the major bodily dysfunction they cause are a big part of that.

But in the end, it’s not being an American film that separates it from the genre, as even if it were a French film it wouldn’t fit either. Part of the horror of New French Extreme films is how the violence is presented; it is served as real, raw, and uncut as possible. It is unflinchingly (and unhappily) violent, and grounded in a level of uncomfortable reality. So, there goes another tenet of the movement: it has to crank up the meanspirited energy in its violence, and it can’t really be “fun” in how it displays its extremity.

WHO ARE THE DIRECTORS OF THE NEW FRENCH EXTREMITY MOVEMENT?

As critical as Quandt was of the idea, he did provide a very handy list of names to focus on as the most prominent voices of the movement:

“François Ozon, Gaspar Noé, Catherine Breillat, Philippe Grandrieux—and now, alas, [Bruno] Dumont”. 

Names missing from that list, but which crop up later in the article and in the scene in general include Alexandre Aja (director of High Tension), Virginie Despentes (the mind behind the very controversial Baise-moi), Alexandre Bustillo & Julien Maury (the duo behind Inside and this years The Soul Eater), and Pascal Laugier (of Martyrs and Incident in a Ghostland fame). And though Xavier Gens was a bit late to the party with his 2007 film Frontier(s), he is an important director in terms of where the movement went and where it’s going with its politics. This isn’t a comprehensive list, but a good starting point for you if you’re interested in the genre.

Advertisement

WHO IS THE MOST INFLUENTIAL NEW FRENCH EXTREMITY DIRECTOR?

The short answer? Michael Haneke. The long answer? Technically, Haneke popularized the use of transgressive elements to shock and disquiet the audience among his contemporaries. Still, Gaspar Noé is the genre codifier and the most dominant voice in the space creatively.  

Despite the extreme nature of films like Funny Games and The Seventh Continent (both brutal and genuinely terrifying), I personally find myself in the camp that his movies are not New French Extreme. We can debate the limits of how messed up something has to be before it’s considered extreme until the cows come home. But the fact is, if you put Haneke’s work alongside all of the films I’ve listed above in the previous segment, he would be the odd man out. He is, simply put, considerably more restrained in terms of showing gore and sexual violence, and the majority of his films’ horror and anxiety come from psychological aspects rather than physical consequences.

The material world is the battleground of the New French Extreme, and the nauseating nature of the films is the tool that Quandt named as the hallmark of the movement. With that in mind, I believe that Gaspar Noé, instead, should be considered the godfather of the genre. Given his films are the most well-known and commercially successful of the New French Extreme “movement”, he is more than worthy of the title; not to mention, he’s the most extreme in all regards. I would consider Irreversible’s directing and presentation to be the peak of the New French Extreme, since its nausea-inducing and sickening content comes with plenty of disorienting directing and editing; and for people with better sound setups than mine, you’ll find the little sound design trick that Noé placed in the film to make it as disturbing as possible.

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF NEW FRENCH EXTREMITY?

A question that is much less definitional, and much more philosophical. Why the bleak landscapes? Why the hopeless endings? Why so much violence against women, especially THAT kind of violence? And there is no clear answer, as every filmmaker has a different motivation. However, there is an undeniably political slant running through most of these movies that can all generally be applied to the rise of the right-wing and alt-right in French politics from the 1990s onward.

Film scholars like Alice Haylett Bryan and Marc Olivier have pointed to films like Inside, Sheitan, and Frontiers as coinciding with and commentating on the rise of politicians like Nicolas Sarkozy, politicians running on strong anti-immigration platforms and blaming the immigrant populations of France for its ills like the 2005 riots. Though it is less easy to see on the surface level, the Mademoiselle of Martyrs and her secret society are a group of wealthy, white French aristocrats who find purpose through the suffering of others, depicted as the impoverished and WOC; they even describe the process of torturing their martyrs as something they do “systematically”, akin to the policies of a government.

Advertisement

Like the trend of the nuclear monster reflecting our Cold War anxieties in the 50s and 60s, and the spike of home invasion films that took place in the 70s, New French Extreme directors have political engines built into their movies. The shocking parts of New French Extremity punctuate what many of these films are supposed to be: countercultural art meant to attack and depict the dangerous political ideologies that spends the lifeblood and livelihood of underserviced people as currency; ideologies that could very well pose a threat to the existence of a democratic France itself.

New French Extremity’s horrifying sights are not only made effective through the verisimilitude of their directing and production; they are made to remind you of the world’s much more realistic terrors, here right now and possibly yet to come. 

DO YOU HAVE NEW FRENCH EXTREMITY RECOMMENDATIONS?

So, now for your required reading from this lecture.

Needless to say, all of the films mentioned in this article bear a massive and profoundly long list of trigger warnings (seriously), primarily for their intense violence, depictions of sexual violence, and depictions of pretty much every terrible thing you can imagine. Please make sure to do your research before watching any of these, and don’t skimp on the self care.

Martyrs (2008) has some of my favorite reveals in any horror movie, and an unforgettable ending you won’t want spoiled, so watch this one first. High Tension is a favorite of many Horror Press readers and writers for a reason. It’s an unrelenting, pulse-pounding film that earns its controversial reputation, and you don’t really feel safe until it’s over (if that). Trouble Every Day gets a lot of flak from Quandt in his original article (what doesn’t?), but I went in blind and was completely caught off guard by what the movie turns into, so avoid any spoilers if you want to see something interesting. Sheitan is a head trip of a film, with recurring face-of-the-genre Vincent Cassel cranking up the madness dial on his performance to an 11. Calvaire, likewise, has a very demented villain on par with the main antagonist of Inside, so they would make for a very interesting double feature if you can stomach two at a time. And while I said Haneke is not New French Extreme, if you want something a little quieter but with an ending that will shake you to your core, I suggest watching The Seventh Continent.

Advertisement

That brings me to the one very big question I had writing this:

Should I even recommend Irreversible? It may be the one film that embodies New French Extremity the most, given how far it pushes the envelope. But do I like it?

No.

It personally is just too much for me. It’s bleak, horrific, it will disturb you entirely and might very well ruin your week, and I can’t stand to watch it. Which is the whole point, but there’s a limit to what I can tolerate. I find Noe is unflinching in his determination to make you run from the theatre and abandon the film altogether, especially in its most infamous and cruel sequence.

From a film history perspective, it is undeniably a piece that has carved itself into French cinema indelibly (for better and for worse), and if you want to plumb the depths of human horror, you’ll be hard-pressed to find as difficult of a watch. So, when you ask me, “Should I watch Irreversible?”, I can only meet you with one honest response: you can certainly try to.

Advertisement

Good luck with that, horror fan.

***

And that will be it for today’s Horror 101 lesson. See you in the next class and stay tuned to Horror Press’s social media feeds for more content on horror movies, television, and everything in between.

Continue Reading

Misc

Physical Media Matters: Terror Vision and ‘Frogman’

Published

on

I’ve talked about Frogman from writer/director Anthony Cousins ad nauseam. It even made my Favorite 3 Horror Movies of 2023 list. Hearing that Frogman was getting a physical release from Terror Vision was music to my ears. And, honestly, how crazy was it that it was also getting shelf space at Walmart?! Very rarely can you find a film that killed on the festival circuit and then was readily available on physical media at both a boutique distribution online store as well as a big box retailer.

August 10th, 2024, would be a day that changed my life; Terror Vision was releasing a deluxe edition Blu-ray bundle with a limit of 100 copies. Typically, boutique labels will do limited edition slipcases for films, limiting them between 1,000 and 2,500 copies. The Frogman Deluxe Edition bundle was different. For $68 bucks, you could get one of the most unique and visually stunning releases of my lifetime. So I purchased it. After preordering this majestic bundle, I waited patiently for two and a half months…and then it arrived.

The purpose of this piece isn’t to rub my one (hundred) of a kind purchase in anyone’s face, instead, it’s to highlight the care and beauty behind this release. Simply put, if you love a movie and find it being released by Terror Vision, you should pick it up. Here is the physical side of what came with this bundle:

  • A black MILF (Man I Love Frogman) shirt
  • A double-sided foldout poster
  • A Frogman-themed brochure of Loveland, Ohio/Frogman Point (With a 15% off coupon for Sticky Tongue Gifts & Collectibles)
  • A Loveland, Ohio postcard
  • A sticker set
  • The Fortune Teller Miracle Fish (not listed on the bundle’s itinerary, but a happy inclusion)
  • A Frogman mug
  • A bound film-supplement book
  • A limited rigid box that perfectly fits over the embossed slipcase
  • AND A CD full of frog sounds!

In all honesty, I initially thought $68 was a steep price. As the minutes passed, I knew my chance of picking one up was dwindling. Once I opened the box, put on the shirt, read the book, and drank some lukewarm coffee out of my mug…

I realized it was beyond worth the price.

Terror Vision has set the bar for labels like Shout! Factory, Vinegar Syndrome, Arrow Video, and many more. I do not know who runs the program behind the scenes, but it’s clear they are some of the deepest fans of physical media out there. If I had to nitpick, there was one issue I have with the Blu-ray. The title screen. It’s a flat image with a play, subtitles, and special features option. These options are overlaid over a thick blue bar and it doesn’t feel very in theme. Even though the title screen felt a bit bland, the special features surely made up for it.

Advertisement

All of this is to say, if you’re a physical media nut like myself and you haven’t picked anything up from Terror Vision, then what are you doing?! They have excellent releases like WNUF Halloween Special, Malum, Door, and so much more. And thanks to Terror Vision for all they’ve done, we can’t wait to see what you release next.

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement