Connect with us

Misc

HORROR 101: The Texas Chain Saw Family Trees

Published

on

Who’s up for a field trip to Texas?

Welcome BACK to Horror Press’s Horror 101, a series of articles where we explain horror movie legends and their lore. For beginners, the confused, or just those who need a refresher, these articles are for you.

Today, we’ll clear up the record on one of Texas’ bloodiest families, the Sawyers from the Texas Chainsaw Massacre series (and their remake counterparts, the Hewitts). It’ll be a rough ride to get to the bottom of who they are, why they kill, and how they developed their…particularly peculiar diet. 

We won’t be delving into the David Blue Garcia 2022 requel much this time or that reboot trilogy with Leatherface and Texas Chainsaw 3D. Instead, we’re focusing on the longest-running series, which we’ll call the mainline continuity (that’s the original, Part 23, and The Next Generation), and the remake duology (the 2003 remake and Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning) which shares some similarities. See the handy dandy chart courtesy of Bloody Disgusting for a proper timeline breakdown. 

So, get to the back of the pickup and ensure you got your chainsaw filled with gas. Or make sure the battery is charged if you’re one of those eco-conscious city types!

Advertisement

WHO ARE THE SAWYERS?

The people who make Leatherface who he is, the Sawyers (originally named the much less subtle “Slaughters” in the script), are a cannibalistic family with more quirky and colorful members than you can shake a stick at. Their M.O.? Luring victims on the land around their home so they can toy with, kill, and eat them. 

Most of their rituals and behaviors are a perversion of the traditional nuclear family, with the most infamous being their prolonged and exhausting dinners in which they relentlessly mock their targets and relish their suffering through torture. 

Possibly with or without literal relish.

In Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Texas Chainsaw Massacre Part 2, the immediate Sawyer family is comprised of:

Advertisement
  • Standing patriarch, father, and award-winning chili cook Drayton Sawyer not-so-standing living fossil, Grandpa Sawyer
  • Deranged hitchhiker, Nubbins Sawyer
  • Nubbin’s twin brother, army veteran, and music lover with a skull plate, Chop Top
  • And, of course, titular chainsaw wielder and mask maker Bubba “Leatherface” Sawyer

There’s also Grandma Sawyer, a chainsaw-holding corpse shrine in Part 2 with no living appearances. Though…this crew is all dead by the end of Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 (except for Leatherface, depending on your interpretation). At the film’s end, Chop Top was supposed to have survived his scuffle with Stretch. However, this was a plan for the unmade short-film All-American Massacre and never came to fruition, so its canonicity is dubious at best.

Leatherface: Texas Chainsaw Massacre 3 shows us a new family, which includes:

  • Suave faux cowboy, Eddie “Tex” Sawyer 
  • Mechanical genius, Tinker Sawyer 
  • Peeping Tom, Alfredo Saywer 
  • Leatherface’s unnamed daughter, who is credited in some places as Babi Sawyer
  • And Leatherface’s mother, Anne Sawyer

Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation rounded us out with only three more official Sawyers: the pretty u nremarkable W.E. Slaughter, a brand-new impostor Grandpa, and extended family member with robot legs, Vilmer Slaughter. 

 

WHO ARE THE HEWITTS IN THE TEXAS CHAINSAW REMAKE?

The remake duology introduced a new version of the family. The Hewitts are distinct from the original Sawyers, in that rather than being a campy bunch of freaks, they’re pseudo-religious nutjobs that don’t take much pleasure in what they do. That is, barring our Drayton analog and head of the family, Charlie Hewitt (using the disguise of Sheriff Hoyt), who commands the rest of them with an iron fist and enjoys abusing captives. Beyond him, there’s: 

  • Surrogate mother to Thomas, Luda-Mae Hewitt
  • Her brother, wheelchair-bound creep Monty Hewitt 
  • The youngest son Jedidiah Hewitt 
  • Baby thief Henrietta Hewitt and her mysterious cohort, The Tea Lady
  • And Thomas “Leatherface” Hewitt 

HOW DID THE SAWYER FAMILY BECOME CANNIBALS?

We can lay the blame on one: Grandpa Sawyer. 

At the time of the original film, Grandpa Sawyer is about 120, meaning he most likely was born in 1854. As a young man, he became a skilled hand in abattoirs and stood as a renowned butcher; Grandpa was deemed (by Drayton) as once having been the family’s best killer due to these skills. We only ever get to see them on display in Leatherface, the first time he wields his trusty hammer with some level of efficiency beyond flapping his wrist around. 

At the turn of the 19th century, Grandpa Sawyer would see the Texan meatpacking industry slowly begin to replace smaller butcher businesses. Due to the speed of the industrialized process, Grandpa lost his job, and soon the family became more insular. The fear of starvation from poverty and general isolation in rural Texas pushed the family to begin the practice.  

Advertisement

HOW DID THE HEWITT FAMILY BECOME CANNIBALS?

In the remake duology, the failure of industrialization sets into motion the Hewitt Family’s corruption; newspapers shown in the film mention a local meat packing plant, The Lee Bros. Meat Processing Plant had gone under and left hundreds in town jobless. It closed due to numerous health violations, most likely related to the mistreatment of workers like Leatherface’s mother who dies on the job after stress-induced labor kills her (though a deformed infant Thomas with a skin condition still survives). 

Unlike Grandpa Sawyer, Charlie Hewitt introduces his family to cannibalism due to his time in the Korean War, where he picked up the habit as a means of survival. Taken captive in 1952, Charlie and other prisoners were forced to choose among themselves who would be sacrificed to feed the rest. Though they were eventually rescued, this practice awakened something in Hewitt that he would eventually spread to the rest of his kin. This also expands on the anti-war subtext of the original film, as much of The Beginning does. 

WHY IS THE SAWYER FAMILY DIFFERENT IN EVERY FILM? 

While Part 2 mainly adds Chop Top, a trend pops up in 3 and The Next Generation, where a new version of the family exists to aid Leatherface. 

There are a few explanations for this.

One could be that Sawyer progeny are just everywhere. After Sally escapes in the first film, Drayton and company relocate to the abandoned Texas Battleland Amusement Park. However, the Sawyer House in 3 and The Next Generation are also different homes, which may be inhabited by extended family members. By this logic, Leatherface somehow survives his wounds in Part 2 and simply moves from family to family whenever he needs assistance. This theory is backed by the fact that Stretch, the protagonist of Part 2, makes a cameo in 3, looking for Leatherface as a now fully-fledged T.V. reporter.

Advertisement

The more outlandish explanation? The Sawyer Family isn’t a real family. 

In Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation, it’s revealed that the Sawyers are funded and protected by a shadowy conspiracy, most likely the Illuminati of legend. Their representative even abducts the last survivor of that film to observe the effects of the Sawyer-induced trauma on her mind. It would make sense that whenever Sawyers are killed, the Illuminati simply funnels in new family members to replace them, and perhaps even creates and installs a new Leatherface should the current one suffers wounds too great to recover from (such as the ill-fated chainsaw duel with Lefty at the end of Part 2). 

HOW DID BUBBA SAWYER BECOME LEATHERFACE?

The primary explanation for Bubba Sawyer, and Thomas Hewitt for that matter, becoming Leatherface is that their families simply brainwashed them into serving as a grunting, violent attack dog. Abused by their respective father figures, the mentally stunted Leatherfaces came to mimic their violent parentage and ended up as a distortion of the breadwinner by hunting down and butchering innocents for the family. 

Hurt people hurt people, you know?  

WHY DOES LEATHERFACE WEAR THE MASKS?

Contrary to popular belief, the grisly masks Bubba sports in the mainline continuity are meant to reveal more than they conceal. While human consumption is a matter of sport and sustenance for the rest of the family, Leatherface’s masks are mostly separate from this as a sign of care and craft. They’re used as a reflection of his emotional state. 

Advertisement

Gunnar Hansen has mentioned many times that Tobe Hooper’s original intent for the varying masks we see is to reflect how Leatherface feels on any given day. They’re used to make him feel pretty or powerful, and he takes great care in fashioning them. The masks can even function as gifts: in Texas Chainsaw Massacre Part 2, he shares a makeshift mask with Stretch in an attempt to save her. Their feminine connotation also directly opposes Drayton’s very masculine, very aggressive energy. 

In the remake duology, however, the answer is much more straightforward: Thomas Hewitt suffers from a mysterious congenital skin disease that ate away at his nose and mouth and uses the mask to cover it up. It’s never outright stated but implied to be caused by the sanitary conditions of the meat packing plant harming his mother while pregnant. 

WHY DOES LEATHERFACE USE A CHAINSAW?

Loud and scary.

This is still my favorite jumpscare of all time. 

Advertisement

Just kidding, the actual answer is it’s a phallic symbol.

From subtext to almost plain text, Part 2 lays it out on the table. Between Bubbas’ beer-spraying chainsaw malfunction and Drayton’s iconic quote about choosing between sex and the saw (see below) makes Leatherface’s chainsaw a representation of sexual repression as the family forces him into the role of being a deranged killer. 

It also symbolizes how toxic masculinity has eaten at the whole family. It’s the ultimate tool of a boy being forced to become the Sawyers’ perception of a man: an aggressive predator who hurts women, built through the teachings of his almost entirely male family. Everybody must emulate Grandpa because he was a “strong” man through tough times, ignoring all the very clearly messed up things he did for and to his family. 

Really, the Texas Chainsaw Massacre movies are some of the most heavily dissected horror films regarding sex and gender, so if you have the time, read some of the many wonderful scholarly works about the franchise. Do I even have to say it? I’m talking about Carol J. Clover. Read “Her Body, Himself” from the legendary Men, Women, and Chainsaws. It’s an excellent essay. 

Advertisement

And that will be it for today’s Horror History 101 lesson. See you in the next class, and stay tuned for more content concerning horror movies, television, and everything in between. 

Luis Pomales-Diaz is a freelance writer and lover of fantasy, sci-fi, and of course, horror. When he isn't working on a new article or short story, he can usually be found watching schlocky movies and forgotten television shows.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Misc

The ‘I Know What You Did Last Summer’ Franchise, Ranked

Published

on

The I Know What You Did Last Summer franchise is a peculiar beast. Think about it. First of all, it never really got started. I consider the foundation of a horror franchise to be the movies that got released at a relatively steady clip (generally one or two years apart) before the series went on hiatus, then took a sharp turn into legacy sequels, direct-to-video sequels, reboots, and the like. For Friday the 13th, that foundation is eight movies. A Nightmare on Elm Street had five. Scream and Child’s Play were founded on solid trilogies. The Conjuring Universe is at eight and counting (and that’s if you skip Curse of La Llorona, which I am loath to do). And what did I Know What You Did Last Summer get? A measly two.

Not only did it fail to get started, it also kind of failed to get going. After the original two movies (the first of which is based on a 1973 young adult novel by Lois Duncan), which were directly in continuity with one another, it had a direct-to-video sequel eight years later and a short-lived television reboot 15 years after that. And yet, like any good horror villain, it refuses to die. With a 2025 legacy sequel coming our way, I thought it was high time to take a look at this misbegotten but indefatigable multimedia series and see just what we can make of it, by ranking its efforts from worst to best.

#4 I Know What You Did Last Summer (2021)

It makes sense that the world was not kind to this one-season Prime Video reboot. When the last entry in a franchise that anyone remotely cared about was more than 20 years earlier, and then you pull a big swing like this, more or less completely removing everything about the characters and premise that was compelling, it’s not going to go well. And that’s not even mentioning the fact that this is an ugly and incompetently-made series, with an outright disdain for the 180-degree line that makes the mere act of watching it feel like aesthetic water torture if you care about film craft even a little bit.

Really, the only thing that it had going for it was the fact that it was set and shot in Hawai’i. In addition to giving it a really grounded sense of place, it also evoked the specificity of the fact that the original movie was set in North Carolina.

#3 I’ll Always Know What You Did Last Summer (2006)

I honestly admire the extravagantly goofy choice to have original killer Ben Willis (Muse Watson in the original movies, Don Shanks in this one) return as a ghost who has become some sort of cross-country specter of previous-summer-themed vengeance. However, this direct-to-video sequel that is otherwise unrelated to anything else in the franchise is bland as all get out and boasts the weakest acting of the franchise. This is somewhat forgivable, given the fact that the original director was fired and the new director had to scramble to get everything together in just two weeks. And that original director was Joe Chappelle, who might have the actual worst filmography of any horror director (Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers, Phantoms, parts of Hellraiser: Bloodline), so we probably dodged a bullet. This could have been even lower!

Advertisement

#2 I Still Know What You Did Last Summer (1998)

I Still Know What You Did Last Summer is immensely, deliriously, outrageously stupid. Mileage will vary on this movie, but if you read my paean to the stupidity of I Still Know What You Did Last Summer from two years ago, you know my mileage is fully “Rascal Flatts in a Prius.” I’m getting that hybrid car highway mileage, baby, and I’m riding it all night long.

That said, it’s obviously not the best entry in the series. As charismatic as Brandy is, the new characters around Ray (Freddie Prinze Jr.) and Julie (Jennifer Love Hewitt) don’t hold a candle to the duo’s original friends in terms of complexity or entertainment value. And the choice (probably made by necessity) to keep the two surviving characters apart for basically the entire span of the story results in the movie completely deflating every time it has to cut back to whatever boring shit Ray is up to.

#1 I Know What You Did Last Summer (1997)

I know, I know, it’s boring when the obvious choice is up top. But sometimes the original is simply the best, and you just have to deal with it. As I’ve already mentioned, the specificity of its setting in a North Carolina fishing town is unique and interesting for a slick, post-Scream slasher. And while the script doesn’t boast the Kevin Williamson-esque touches of his other work from the 1990s (it was written before Scream, and it shows), it’s a solid meat-and-potatoes slasher movie with a fun killer M.O. (hook-wielding murderers are so popular in urban legends for a reason) and a group of friends that includes Ryan Phillippe and Sarah Michelle Gellar at the heights of their powers.

Continue Reading

Misc

Checking into ‘Hell Motel’ with Jim Watson and Paula Brancati

Published

on

Fans of the Canadian horror anthology Slasher might want to check into Hell Motel this summer. In case you missed the news, “Hell Motel is a series from Slasher series creators Ian Carpenter and Aaron Martin.” Slasher fans will quickly notice a ton of familiar names in addition to the co-creators and director Adam MacDonald. The team is also bringing a good amount of the Slasher acting ensemble along for the bloody ride. This is why we were honored to be invited to a press roundtable with Jim Watson and Paula Brancati. Watson and Brancati are two of the Slasher alums you can expect to see in Hell Motel. They are also a fun duo on a Wednesday afternoon. 

According to Shudder’s synopsis: “Hell Motel sees a group of 10 true crime obsessives invited to the opening weekend of the newly renovated Cold River Motel, the site of a 30-year-old unsolved Satanic Mass Murder. History repeats itself when the guests get stranded and start getting knocked off one by one during a murder spree that grows exponentially more gruesome than the original with each kill.”

Andy (Watson) and Paige (Brancati) are two of the characters who have been invited to this murderous weekend. The first question we all wanted to know was what drew this pair into this series and made them want to explore these characters.

An Interview with Hell Motel’s Jim Watson and Paula Brancati

This roundtable discussion has been edited for brevity and clarity.

Paula Brancati explained: I so loved working with Ian (Carpenter) and Aaron (Martin) on the Slasher series, and they always write such incredible characters for me and for the entire team. I love being part of a world where the female characters are very voicey on the page. They’re not tropey in any way, as can sometimes be the case in the genre. So, for me, it was a very easy yes.

Advertisement

Brancati continued: Aaron Martin and I have worked together since Being Erica, and he and Ian always surprise me. They write stuff that’s incredibly dark and very funny. When I heard some of my old castmates, like Jim Watson here, were going to be a part of it…that also made the yes extra easy and special. So yeah, it was a lot of fun to come back with a lot of our old Slasher family to do Hell Hotel. A lot of that amazing crew that we’ve worked with so much. It felt like a bit of a summer camp.

When asked if they found anything difficult while filming, Jim Watson said: The interesting thing about the Andy character is that he’s approaching all of this as this sort of analytical skeptic. You know, he’s a PhD. He’s really going in there, and it’s that balance of anyone in that world. In that field. Any skeptic has to [have] a kernel of love or appreciation for the thing that they’re actually trying to disprove. So, there was this sort of element of battling the excitement of the moment with each of the scenes while also remaining grounded and being ready to point out the obvious to everyone. It was just this fun tightrope to walk, and I got to really work closely with our director, Adam (MacDonald). He and I were in constant conversation about, “Is this too much? Is this not enough?” That kind of thing.

Watson continued: It was great because it’s so rare that we actually get to really stretch those kinds of muscles. And you know, Ian and Aaron, they set this stuff up for us like Paula said. They give it to each and every character. There’s so much in there to work with. So, it was a lot of fun.

Brancati stated: Yeah, it’s very juicy material. As Jim was saying about Andy, and I think this is the case for all the characters, there’s a lot of textures. A lot of layers. We’re also shooting all of it out of order [because] they shoot all 8 episodes at once. So, that’s a unique situation. You’re shooting like a very long movie, so I’d say the most challenging part is the endurance. You know we’ve done that model for Slasher, as well.

Brancati explained: You have to be a bit masochistic to love this setup, I think, but I love it. There’s an adrenaline rush to it, in sort of building the puzzle. I think the challenge is shooting something from a later episode, perhaps at the beginning of the shoot, and then filling in that blank on day 50 of the shoot and making it work with decisions you made creatively at the beginning. I think that’s really fun and part of what’s very joyful about working with actors you love, like Jim and this amazing cast.

Advertisement

You know, Adam and Ian and Aaron, we’re all watching out for each other and vibing together. I think part of the challenge is part of what the joy of it is. It’s also a physical show. There’s a lot of stunts. There’s a lot of screaming and yelling, and you know, emotional stuff the characters go through. So, I think that’s like part of the challenge, but part of the joy. It’s a very cathartic shoot. 

Brancati laughed: I would highly recommend working through whatever you have going on on a horror set, my friends. Just scream it out…and go on vocal rest after.

When the laughter died down, the duo was asked about working with Emmy® Award-winner Eric McCormack, who plays a character people are going to love to hate this season.

Watson: For me, I mean, that was my first time working with him, and I mean, he’s probably heard this a million times. I grew up watching Will & Grace, and like, I loved him. He was this outlet, this voice, in a small town community of this other thing, and I just worship that individual.

Watson continued: So, getting to work and meet with him. My expectations were pretty high, and he just came in and was the most humble, sweetest, nicest person. And yeah, funny, like duh, he’s funny, but like, actually just a funny person doing schticky things, too. Like stuff that you’re like, ‘Oh, my dad would do that!’ But then, like when he does it, it’s hilarious, you know. He was just wonderful. He was just a shining star in a very dark and murderous environment.

Advertisement

Brancati: Yes, I feel the same. I worked with Eric on the last season of Slasher that we did, and I was a bit nervous to meet him because I, too, was such a huge Will & Grace fan. I was worried that I would call him Will on set. That show meant so much to me and my mom growing up, and he is everything you’d want him to be and more. He is such a delight! He’s such a Toronto boy. We went to see our friend, up in Stratford last year.

Our buddy, Dan Chameroy, is one of the stars of Stratford. We were like going to Swiss Chalet together and talking about Toronto hotspots and being like, ‘Yeah, he’s one of us.’ [Eric] is one of us, and he loves being part of our motley crew on Slasher. I feel like we’re doing this like, gritty indie, and he’s so down for that, and so playful as an actor.

Watson asked: You went to Swiss Chalet with Eric Mccormick? 

Brancati exclaimed through laughter: Let that be the headline! 

Soon after, the conversation turned to the true crime genre. Both actors were asked if they are fans of the genre and if they drew from any real people in the true crime sphere for their characters.

Advertisement

Watson: My wife and I love to listen to those podcasts that tell you about every horrific murder under the sun. That sort of approach, that storytelling, too, of true crime dramas, you know, it’s really an interesting thing to retell a story that is very familiar to people in a new and enticing way, and in some respects, that is what the creators of Hell Motel and Slasher, [are] really playing into. A genre that is well established, and they’re paying homage.

Brancati: Yeah, I’ve gotten into those too, Jim. Those are oddly comforting, and they’re crazy.

Watson: Yeah, which is very scary, that we’re comfortable.

Brancati: I’ve read this somewhere, I think women love them, – and Jim tell me, if this feels right for your lady. But it’s like we like knowing we were right. We’re right to be as worried as we are. I just want to feel validated.

We acknowledged that the show is fun but is also hard on actors. When asked how they take care of themselves during filming, Watson and Brancati explained they have very different methods.

Advertisement

Jim Watson and Paula Brancati from Hell Motel

Watson: I mean, I stretched. There was a lot of physical preparation for most days. Honestly, blood isn’t my thing. It does kind of freak me out a bit. We had an amazing props person who allowed us to really ask questions, and that really allowed me to get close to the instruments and things like that that we’d be standing around.

Watson continued: It was really just reminding myself that this is all pretend. That was the best approach for a lot of these scenes because some of the sets were horrifying. Like if I suddenly passed out and, like my buddies, dragged me into this room, and I woke up. I don’t know what I would dothat would have been immediate cardiac arrest. So, just really reminding myself that everything’s okay and I’d hold onto Paula tightly once in a while, and she-

Brancati: I would have a dance break now and again.

They both begin laughing. 

Watson: Oh no!

Advertisement

Brancati: Jim and I do this little dance break that was.

Watson: It was beautiful. It was.

Brancati: Gotta laugh because you gotta laugh. (A moment as she figures out how much of her dance she can do on Zoom.) I can’t stand for it but I would go, “Jim! Jim, Gaga.” I kind of (Brancati does some amazing Zoom shoulder work), but my hips would go. It was like I was suddenly in Sweet Charity, but he’d do it.

Watson: It’s the Gaga. That was really, the just…it killed me every [time].

Brancati: Absolutely no sense.

Advertisement

Watson: Yeah. 3 AM. 3 PM. It didn’t matter when.

Brancati: In the middle of the most intense scene.

Watson: (Laughing.) Yes.

Brancati: Full-time. That’s mental health to me. That’s how I would take care of myself and Jim.

When the laughter died down, Brancati also shouted out the Craft table for having well-timed grilled cheese sandwiches and charcuterie. While she admits she could have stretched more while preparing for some scenes, she stressed the importance of vocal warmups.

Advertisement

Brancati: Especially as I’ve gotten older, and I’m a singer, just being aware of the vocal strain. So, truly, just physically stretching my voice, I would do a lot. I would warm up a lot in the morning. I’d cool down at the end of the night. As we got to the end of the shoot. I was using different techniques, just kind of taking care of that because the voice does tell a lot of the story for this show for sure. To say the least.

You can see Jim Watson and Paula Brancati if you check into Hell Motel. The new Shudder show premieres in the United States on Tuesday, June 17th.

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement