Connect with us

Misc

‘The Fly’ Movies Ranked (There’s More Than You Think)

Published

on

When people talk about the 1980s’ great horror remakes, they always bring up three titles updating 1950s sci-fi classics. Those would be John Carpenter’s The Thing, David Cronenberg’s The Fly, and Chuck Russell’s The Blob. It is generally recognized that both the originals and the remakes are pretty great in all three cases. However, when it came time to bring you good folks a ranking for Horror Press’ sci-fi month, one emerged victorious. Now, each franchise has at least three movies. 1958’s The Blob has a sequel (Beware! The Blob, from 1972). And 1982’s The Thing has a prequel (2011’s The Thing). However, The Fly franchise actually has five movies altogether. The extended Fly franchise isn’t talked about as much as it should be, and it’s highly deserving of a ranking. So let’s take a deeper look at this oh-so underrated series.

The Fly Movies Ranked

#5 The Fly II (1989)

The sequel to David Cronenberg’s The Fly gets a bad rap, because it’s not David Cronenberg’s The Fly. In The Fly II, Eric Stoltz plays Seth Brundle’s son, Martin. In the tradition of many a puberty metaphor, his dormant fly DNA triggers a transformation when he reaches sexual maturity. All in all, this movie is actually pretty good. It has a decently emotional narrative centered on the idea of parents passing a disease to their children. It has a bombastic score by Christopher Young. And it’s pretty gooey and gross, in the grand tradition of fun 1980s horror. However, it’s still a bit goofy and repetitive in a way that prevents it from climbing higher up the list. Plus, the only actor from the original 1986 movie who comes back (outside of archive footage) is John Getz. No shade on Getz, but he’s no Jeff Goldblum or Geena Davis.

#4 Curse of the Fly (1965)

On the other hand, Curse of the Fly wields goofiness as its most memorable strength. It gets away with it because it is never ever boring. However, the third Fly movie goes totally off the rails as far as the franchise is concerned. So it’s not going to be that satisfying as the third stepping stone of a larger marathon. It basically forgets that these movies are about scientists accidentally blending their DNA with houseflies. Instead, it expands its scope to a broader “mad science” realm. Primarily, it follows a young woman discovering the sinister secrets harbored by the rich family she hastily married into. It’s part Rebecca, part The Island of Dr. Moreau, and all weird. In a very good way.

#3 Return of the Fly (1959)

Stop me if you’ve heard this one before. The son of the guy from 1958’s The Fly finds himself caught up in the aftermath of his father’s experiment. Unfortunately, the human-fly hybrid stuff here isn’t that interesting. It plays more like a generic 1950s monster movie than any of the other installments. However, that bit only comes in the third act, after an hour of pure mayhem! We’re talking even more experiments gone wrong (a guinea pig is given human hands in one memorably surreal moment). We’re talking juicy family melodrama. We’re talking backstabbing, duplicity, and Vincent Price. Overall, it’s a pretty good time! Also the male lead, Brett Halsey, is a total babe. You know, if that helps.

#2 The Fly (1958)

The Fly could easily have been terrible. It’s quite obviously cheap, and some of its special effects are dodgy. It’s not particularly action-packed, either. It mostly focuses on the investigation of the mysterious death of the brother of François Delambre (Vincent Price). Given that this is a movie called The Fly, you get no points for guessing what happened to him. However, even if you’re several steps ahead of the mystery, it’s still a rock-solid thrill ride. Both in the present and in flashbacks, the movie largely focuses on the dead man’s wife, Helene (Patricia Owens). This allows it to revel in watching her cozy domestic life swiftly unravel, which requires no special effects at all. It’s a hell of a satisfying watch that swivels between nihilistic horror movie and charming 1950s sci-fi romp. And I like both of those things very much!

#1 The Fly (1986)

I sometimes break from tradition with my No. 1 picks, but that will not be the case here. No way, no how! Cronenberg’s remake of The Fly does everything you want a remake to do. First, it amps up the special effects something fierce. His The Fly is a gruesome, gut-churning adventure. It constantly asks, “Could the human body get any grosser?” and always answers that question with a firm yes. However, it also takes the bare-bones plot of the original and adds a huge amount of depth. While both movies follow couples being challenged by the man becoming a fly-human hybrid, the remake’s romance is infinitely richer. The Fly is not only a great remake, but the ultimate auteur horror film. It feels like nothing less than David Cronenberg cracking open his skull and smearing his brain across the camera lens.

Brennan Klein is a millennial who knows way more about 80's slasher movies than he has any right to. He's a former host of the  Attack of the Queerwolf podcast and a current senior movie/TV news writer at Screen Rant. You can also find his full-length movie reviews on Alternate Ending and his personal blog Popcorn Culture. Follow him on Twitter or Letterboxd, if you feel like it.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Misc

STEPHEN KING VILLAINS: Smash or Pass

Published

on

Stephen King probably has the most iconic mix of villains of any horror creator. Yes, Wes Craven has both Krueger and Ghostface, and John Carpenter has Michael Myers and the blue-skull aliens, but let’s be real. King comes out on top for his sheer variety of colorful, nightmare-inducing, iconic, sexy characters.

Hold up, did I say sexy? That can’t be right. Oh…it seems I did, and that can only mean one thing: a smash or pass ranking of Stephen King’s most iconic villains. Pennywise the Clown and Leland Gaunt can steal your soul, but can they steal your heart? And just to clarify the ranking, we are going solely on the characters themselves, not the actors who have portrayed them.

SMASH or PASS: Stephen King Villains Edition

SMASH: Annie Wilkes

Yeah, she’s crazy, but come on. She loves to read, is resourceful, and knows her way around… a sledgehammer? Just don’t kill off her favorite character, and you’re safe. Her farmhouse also seems super cozy, so any time spent there would be lovely. As long as she doesn’t have any problems with my screenplays, I’ll take my chances.

PASS: Leland Gaunt

This is the hardest pass on this list. Everything is a mind game with this guy. Sure, he’ll pay for dinner, but he’ll probably later make you pay him back by stealing a dog or performing some other bizarre task. Everything would be a bargain and transactional. With no clear communication, he is actually the worst imaginable partner on the list. Besides, according to the book, he is a reptilian demon riding a white horse? Check, please…

NEUTRAL: Pennywise

Pennywise’s attractiveness varies wildly. This interdimensional shapeshifter can be literally anything…Sure, Bill Skarsgard is plenty attractive, and his take would absolutely be a smash, but knowing there’s a cosmic spider under there might be a turn-off. He is also a cannibalistic chaos demon, but so are half the characters on this list. You win some and lose some when you open Tinder in Derry, Maine.

PASS: Randall Flagg

Every iteration of Flagg going back to the books has portrayed him as really hot. So why a pass? Well, his whole character is built on the concept of false promises. He feels like your worst ex-situationships. Always promising something bigger, he is a total manipulator who will use you for his own power. Also, he looks real nasty with the devil horns…and not in a good way.

SMASH: Christine

Hear me out. Let’s ignore the fact that she’s a cosmically possessed car. Christine is loyal, loving, and protective. Sure, she’s manipulative and pure evil, but she is obsessed with you. Flagg, for instance, would dump you the second he got what he wanted. But Christine wants you and only you. Maybe that’s worse, given you now have to walk down the aisle with a 1958 Plymouth Fury. But hey, if you don’t have commitment issues, Christine might be your gal.

PASS: Jack Torrance

Going off of the book, it’s a no, solely because when he qualifies as a villain, he is possessed by a sentient hotel. In the movie, he is psychotic from the start of the film. There is no way to spin the possessed Jack Torrance in a positive light.

SMASH: Kurt Barlow

I have no defense for this. I just have a good feeling about him. How can you say no to those eyes! Vampires are sexy. Well, some vampires. I feel like he has kind of an Eggers’ Nosferatu appeal? You LITERALLY cannot resist him. So hey, this seems to be a SMASH whether I want it to be or not.

PASS: Warden Samuel Norten

Unlike most of the villains on this list, Norten is not a fun, supernatural being. This is a real kind of evil. There is not even a joke to be found with this one-this guy sucks. Pass on all accounts. What does it say about your politics when I would rather take my chances with an interdimensional spider-clown?

SMASH: Rose the Hat

Does this even need an explanation? Rose is BY FAR the most attractive Stephen King villain. Sorry Mike Flanagan, the eerie little glowing eyes are kinda hot. I am sure that was not your intention. But here we are. As long as you don’t have the shine, you should be safe. Not sure if I would be down to join her weird RV demon-polycule, but otherwise, it’s a done deal. Actually, you know what? Why the Hell not. Let’s get some shining-mist together!

SMASH: The Creep

It’s so hard to find funny guys, right? Not anymore! The Creep is a total jokester. Funny, intelligent…what’s not to love? Well, the rotting skin and exposed skeleton can be a turn-off, but no one’s perfect. It’s what’s on the inside that counts!

Continue Reading

Misc

The ‘Urban Legend’ Franchise RANKED

Published

on

Ah, Urban Legend…the plucky younger sibling franchise to Scream. If this is the first time you realize that it’s a franchise at all, that is totally fair. The cult classic slasher’s only theatrical sequel was a critical and box office flop. The third film, Bloody Mary, was direct-to-video. The film has an interesting comparative pitch to Scream. While Scream is a meta-slasher toying with the rules of horror, Urban Legend has its killer basing its slice-and-dicin’ off of famous urban legends…and then they just basically did a version of Scream 3 for its sequel. It’s a fascinating trilogy, particularly in how the movies connect. In Final Cut, the first film exists as an urban legend itself. Bloody Mary, however, is a complete standalone that could be read as an urban legend within the universe of the first entry.

The Urban Legend Franchise Ranked From Worst to Best

So…how do these three films rank against each other? Are the sequels worth checking out at all? Pull up a chair, relax, and start mixing your Pop-Rocks and soda; this is the worst-to-best ranking of the Urban Legend trilogy.

Urban Legends: Bloody Mary (2005)

Unsurprisingly, the straight-to-video, nearly completely forgotten supernatural entry is last. Directed by Mary Lambert of Pet Sematary acclaim, the movie is a straightforward supernatural horror. Three teen girls say “Bloody Mary” three times into a mirror, and it resurrects a vengeful spirit.

The movie is not terrible by any means. It is just pretty standard, with some good moments of schlocky, 2000s fun. For those that grew up in this era, it can be a goofy little nostalgia trip! The cheesy SFX, hilariously awkward teen acting, and cinematography of a Coke commercial make it a really easy watch. It’s almost like a much bloodier Goosebumps episode! However, for those not fans of this divisive era of TV-horror, it can be a bit of a slog.

The idea of making a movie that feels in-Universe to the first film is clever. However, it is unclear whether that was the exact intention. Despite this critic’s personal, nostalgic love of this film, it is not connected to the franchise at all. Even if this was a masterpiece, this detail makes it hard to put it anything above last place. Sorry Bloody Mary, I still love you.

Advertisement

Urban Legend (1998)

Ready the guillotine. Light up the torches. Find the IP address this article was written on-but let me explain. Yes, it is controversial not to put this one in first place. Still, it is really more of a tie than second placement. This and Final Cut are vastly different, which makes the franchise interesting, nearly incomparable. They each succeed in their own sub-genres…but this one misses the mark.

Urban Legend is a cult classic for a reason. It is completely itself as a late-90s, teen campus-slasher. The movie takes a simple premise, combining it with a likeable cast and a gothic, dark-academia setting. It feels like it was made for slumber parties and sleepovers. A combination of 80s slashers and campfire tales? Amazing. Plus, the soundtrack is killer.

That being said, the mystery, story, and characters are all just okay. The answers to the mystery (spoilers…?) fall in line with I Know What You Did Last Summer, and many films from the 80s. Prom Night, April Fool’s Day, and The Burning all come to mind. If this came out before Scream, this would be number one, for sure. It is probably, technically, the best film of the franchise, if I had to be objective. However, it just doesn’t reach the levels of originality the final film on this list does.

Urban Legends: Final Cut (2000)

Urban Legends: Final Cut is fantastic. No, really. It’s great, and one of the most underrated slashers of its time. While Scream picked apart the slasher genre in a meta-horror classic, this movie picks apart the horror film industry. The film has a lot of commentary on toxicity in the industry, and it is matched by an on-brand mystery.

A big issue with movies is finding a decent throughline. Look at the first Urban Legend, for example. The reason the killer kills has nothing to do with urban legends themselves-it is just a creepy MO. However, the killer in Final Cut has a motive rooted in filmmaking itself. The movie stays on brand, delivering on its promise. It is distinctly different from Scream, while still being perfect for fans of that franchise.

Advertisement

Without spoiling, the mystery is great. While the final reveal is somewhat predictable, the twists and turns of the story itself are great. For fans of lost media horror like Red Rooms or Cigarette Burns, the mystery veers into that. One part of the film involves a student film with a mystery splice in the film spool. While the movie is funnier than it is scary, and somewhat outdated at points, it still feels the most rewatchable of all three movies.

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria