Connect with us

Interviews

[INTERVIEW] Roger Conners Talks the Making of ‘MEAT’: Killer Costumes, Queer Panic, and Carnage in Cleveland

Published

on

Horror Press is always on the prowl for great indie horror films, and there are few films we’ve been following the development of as closely as MEAT

An Interview With MEAT Director Roger Conners

When a self-destructive friend circle lets one of their own take the fall after a night of drug-filled partying goes wrong, their biggest mistake comes back to haunt them years later. With their old friend out of jail, a killer named The Stud is on the loose to exact vengeance for the events of that night, picking off members of the group one by one. And as the poster and trailer promise, this time, he’s going in raw.

The film has made quite the buzz in the horror community and is wrapping up the final stretch of its long funding campaign on IndieGogo and Kickstarter. But who is Roger Conners, the director and co-writer behind MEAT? What drove him to make the film, and how did the villainous design of Stud come to be? We find out about that, and a whole lot more, in an exclusive interview, one you can only find here on Horror Press. 

***

So, just want to start off by saying I really am glad you could talk to us here at Horror Press about MEAT. It’s one of the projects we’ve been keeping our eyes on, and I know a good chunk of our readers have been too.

Advertisement

Roger Conners: I very much appreciate hearing that! My team and I are so thankful for the overwhelming amount of support we have received for MEAT.

A lot of people ask for an elevator pitch of a film, but I want to put the heat on you here. In ten words or less, tell me what MEAT is about. Condense the spirit of the film down for me.

RC: Mean gays do shitty things and get their deserved comeuppance. 

MEAT is an unabashedly queer film. It’s an LGBTQ+ themed slasher as you’ve put it. Could you tell us what the intersection between the creation of the film and the queer community has been like throughout making it?

RC: I’ve been working in indie film since I was 19 years old, and when I started this journey things were very different, especially when it came to queer representation in cinema, horror or otherwise. Queer characters were rare to come by, and if they did exist, they were often presented as an over-the-top stereotype or as some form of comedic relief. Today, queer characters have the potential to be much more layered and nuanced. This is why I feel MEAT succeeds. Yes, it’s a slasher. Yes, it’s jam-packed with gut-churning gore that horror fans will love. But I assure you that it is also so much more. 

Advertisement

MEAT was shot in Ohio, your home state. Given the inherently political nature of the film, and the conversations going on in Ohio regarding the suppression of queer and trans rights, were there any reservations towards making MEAT there? Did it fuel your artistic process?

RC: While Ohio is an extremely conservative state that is brimming with anti-abortion billboards and anti-queer rhetoric, Cleveland is very much a little blue dot surrounded by a sea of red. We do often see much of that hostility and aggression overflowing into our neighborhoods and infesting our safe spaces. A local community theatre I support has been dealing with picketers who bombard their local drag queen story-time, and seeing that in my backyard has certainly been a harsh smack of reality. These moments fuel my fire and make me feel that MEAT is more important than ever. There are still voices out there attempting to drown us out, so we need to rise above the noise and ensure that we remain outspoken, vigilant, and constantly aware. Crafting cinema that focuses on the LGBTQIA+ community is my way of speaking out.

What was the first queer horror film you ever saw, and do you think there are any echoes of it in MEAT?

RC: I remember seeing Hellbent in the mid-2000s, which really blew my mind. It was so unlike anything else I had seen up to this point. I absolutely channeled my love for that film while crafting a queer-themed slasher of my own. It inspired me to think outside the box and consider the idea that queer characters could not only exist within a horror film, but could also lead one.

One of the bigger challenges of indie filmmaking is that there are inevitably ideas that need to be left on the cutting room floor, primarily because of cost. Were there any ideas you were able to make work that you didn’t initially think would happen?

Advertisement

RC: I always tend to write big and then scale it back until it becomes achievable within our means. The original treatment for MEAT was about 150+ pages long and brimming with over-the-top sequences that would be difficult to pull off on an independent budget. Luckily, my co-writer Zach Shildwachter is far more reasonable than I am and was able to reel me back a bit. But overall, the script has remained true to the original concept, and most of the standout moments of gore that I originally envisioned made it to the final draft. 

You’re in Phase 3 of MEAT’s funding campaign, with (at the time of writing this) just under a month left on IndieGogo. Could you detail the most challenging part of finishing MEAT on the production side of things?

RC: We have had varying levels of success with our three attempts at crowdfunding through Indiegogo, and thankfully Phase 3 has proven to be our most successful by far. While we certainly saw support early on in our process, we didn’t have much to show for it because we were just starting off and getting the ball rolling. There was no footage so no trailers, no stills, and not much to help convince fans of the genre that this was a project worth backing. I ended up funding most of what we filmed over the first year out of my pocket. While it was extremely stressful and financially draining, it was worth it. We decided to film the movie in three chunks, and we then used our early footage to create a teaser trailer to help promote our content. That really helped stimulate a significant amount of attention for our film.

Having one of the more memorable slasher villain designs in recent memory, The Stud, I was wondering if there were any particular inspirations for the killer we might not immediately assume? 

RC: You know, the idea of the aesthetic of the killer’s costume really started with that jacket. I had it custom-made for myself and used it for a photo shoot, and every time someone saw it, the first thing that came out of their mouth was, “You could kill somebody with that thing!” And the fact is, yes, you could. It weighs about 50 lbs., and those spikes are all very much real, it would get such a response from people I knew it was just worth utilizing it. So, I designed a few prototypes built around the jacket, and we decided to lean into the whole fetish/bondage/leather vibe with the harness and the rubber suit. 

Advertisement

Can the actor actually see out of that thing or does The Stud need a handler?

RC: The mask is as difficult to see through as you think it is, so we must strategically choreograph every sequence involving the killer. Every step, every turn, every grab must be perfectly timed to ensure that the actor under the mask is always safe and able to confidently operate within his surroundings. It provides a lot of challenges, but I think it’s absolutely worth the hassle.

And in terms of The Stud ripping and tearing through his victims, how nasty can the fans out there expect MEAT to get?

RC: Oh, let me assure you that the violence and gore are absolutely of the utmost importance here. Sure, this is a piece of queer cinema that’s telling a queer story, but first and foremost this is a queer slasher, and it’s intended to give fans of the genre exactly what they want from it. The kills are our top priority, and we are going all in on the practical effects and intensity of the kills. A great example in my mind would be the climax of Karyn Kusama’s The Invitation. Those whole final 15 minutes or so take your breath away, and it just felt so real and visceral and unflinching. That’s the kind of tone I’m striving for here. Brutal, unsympathetic horror with a high body count.

The concept trailer for MEAT has a very catchy song by synth artist Toska Bear behind it. Working with Toska Bear and finding MEAT’s musical voice, placing it at the forefront for selling your movie, how did that process happen? 

Advertisement

RC: I’ve known Jason, aka Toska Bear for years now, and I’ve been following his journey and the progression of his sound, which is honestly so kickass, and I jam to it regularly, so I knew I wanted to incorporate a few of his tracks in MEAT. One day I kind of just fell into a black hole of listening to Prom Queen Days on loop, and I started envisioning how it could play into the movie, so I just asked him on a whim, and he was super into the idea right off the bat. I started using his music as a soundtrack for the conceptual stages of pre-production while we were creating the look for The Stud and style of the film and the overall vibe we were going for. It was hugely influential on the tone of the movie, so I’m very thankful he’s been so generous with allowing us to use his music throughout it. 

You have been an assistant director on many projects, but also primarily an actor from what I understand. Does that give you a sort of edge as a director when it comes to directing your cast?

RC: I feel that the connection I share with my cast is probably my strongest suit as a director. Having been an actor for the majority of my life, I know what I personally expect from a director and what I need to help build upon my performance in order to truly deliver. I like to think I provide my cast with a safe space where they’re encouraged to dive a little deeper and really explore the depths of their characters’ psyche, and I definitely motivate them to go there. 

You’ve mentioned on your Horror Press Podcast appearance that very few filmmakers are out here making queer horror films, and it’s true. Do you have any contemporaries you would want to give a shout-out to, or personal inspirations that deserve mention?

RC: I know you interviewed them recently, but the Monster Makeup boys out of Rhode Island are kickass. Their most recent title, Saint Drogo exceeded my expectations in so many ways. I mean, it left my jaw on the floor and had me thinking about it for weeks after my initial viewing. Then, of course, we have my beloved podcast co-host Troy Escamilla, whom I was lucky enough to work with on the set for Teacher Shortage, and we’re going to be reuniting for his next feature, Hollow Lake, in the summer of 2024. I’ve recently had the chance to watch works from Chris Moore and Jay Pmlieri, and they are both fantastic artists with defined styles that I really enjoy. 

Advertisement

We all watch the classics, your Halloween’sNightmare’s and Friday’s. But what are some obscure slasher movies you think most people don’t know about that they should? What’s a lesser-known must-watch for you?

RC: Some of my favorite slashers would be titles such as Stage FrightIntruder, and The Prowler, which offer up some of the finest kills from within the genre. 

Daydream with me a bit. No reins, no questions asked, just unlimited funding, whatever you need to make it. What kind of horror movie would you make? Would it be a sequel to Meat, or something more out there?

RC: Oh, you mean MEAT: 2 the Bone? Oh yes, that’s definitely something I envision coming to fruition at some point in the near future. I have a script for a pretty wild body-horror-infused outbreak film like The Crazies, Demons, or even The Sadness. The only thing scarier than one person trying to hunt you down is 50 people trying to hunt you down. A film like that falls right in my wheelhouse, but one step at a time. Before I talk about anything else, I need to ensure I serve up a delicious serving of MEAT to our very patient and supportive fanbase. They deserve something meaty to sink their teeth into.

***

Advertisement

And there you have it, my carnivorous film fans; you get to see how the sausage gets made. To support Roger and the rest of the MEAT cast and crew, check out the IndieGogo to contribute to the film here! Make sure to also follow Roger on Twitter here, and Zach on Twitter here for the latest updates on MEAT

And for more articles and interviews like this one on the latest and greatest in horror movies, television, and news, stay tuned to Horror Press!

Luis Pomales-Diaz is a freelance writer and lover of fantasy, sci-fi, and of course, horror. When he isn't working on a new article or short story, he can usually be found watching schlocky movies and forgotten television shows.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Interviews

[INTERVIEW] Inside the Glitter-Streaked World of ‘The Vampire Lestat’ with Production Designer Andres Cubillan

Published

on

Lestat, Lestat, Lestat. That’s been the name on my lips ever since the first teasers for AMC’s The Vampire Lestat dropped last year. This new iteration of the show formerly known as Interview with the Vampire centers on the eponymous Brat Prince himself, Lestat de Lioncart (Sam Reid), as he embarks on a cross-country tour of contemporary America with his self-titled band, his antics immortalized on film by snarky baby bloodsucker Daniel Molloy (Eric Bogosian), the ghosts of his past hot on his heels.

But if you’re reading this, you already know all that. You’re here for the juicy details, and who better to dish them than the man who crafts Lestat’s most intimate spaces, production designer Andres Cubillan? A newcomer to the world that Anne Rice created and showrunner Rolin Jones breathed new life into, Cubillan helped ensure that The Vampire Lestat feels like an entirely different beast to the seasons that came before it, without losing sight of the series’ immortal soul—or Lestat’s divine bitchiness.

Around the midway point of the season, I caught up with Cubillan to discuss the big questions in life, like “doesn’t that shower make the bus damp?” and “how do you cuddle in a coffin made for one?” Here’s what he had to say about designing for the wolf killer extraordinaire’s most chaotic and iconic era yet.

The Vampire Lestat Turns up the Dial on the World We’ve Seen So Far (And Yes, It Goes to Eleven)

Samantha McLaren: The shift to Lestat’s perspective this season really turns expectations on their head. As production designer, how much freedom did you have to overhaul the look and feel of the show—and were you nervous at all about changing things that fans had come to expect?

Andres Cubillan: Yes, absolutely. When I was meeting for it, Rolin said from the get-go that he wanted this to look like a completely different show. He said “this is basically like we are rebooting our own show,” so he knew it had to be a total tonal shift, a total visual shift.

Advertisement

For me, my nerves came from the high quality of the work before. I’m a good friend of Mara LePere-Schloop [production designer on the first two seasons]. I trained under her, I admire her immensely, so it was more about how to do the beautiful work justice. And I’ve said this before, but I wanted to be able to crank up the dial on what Lestat would be now, present day—his point of view and his emotional state. I took liberties where liberties were given, and I just knew that it needed to be incredibly well researched, and there needed to be so much thought behind everything—not just because our writers are so passionate about the original literature, the scripture, but also the fans. Our fans know every word that Anne Rice has written front and back. We couldn’t just be flippant about any decision. We needed to do something spectacular for her, and for the character.

SM: One thing I love about vampire media is the inherent tension between the allure and glamour of vampirism, and the decay and death that’s an inherent part of it. Is that tension something that you wanted to play with this season?

AC: I try to actually go away from the traditional vampire tropes. In early discussions with Rolin, we said let’s be very particular as to where we use red—where black is even used… We wanted Lestat to feel unique in the vampire genre, as opposed to cliché in any way.

In terms of the allure, he’s so insanely alluring in and of himself that it’s going to come naturally, so for me, it was a matter of trying to fill in the blanks in the script—what can I say in the design that’s going to give context to him and his actions in that particular moment? It sort of naturally becomes alluring and sexy and dramatic, but I don’t think it was a conscious thing.

Lestat’s Tour Bus Showcases the Personalities of Its Occupants—And the Collaboration Between the Crew

SM: It comes through in interesting ways, like his tour bus. You have the dichotomy of that glamorous, sleek upper deck and the dingy, disgusting lower deck. When you were designing the bus, how much did you research real tour buses, and how much of it came from lurid imaginings?

AC: A lot of research. There was something so easy in grounding a rock star like Lestat in more of a retro vibe—Bowie, Jagger, Iggy Pop—but I wanted to try to blend it in with more of a contemporary musician. So, I looked a lot at contemporary tour buses, but they’re not very exciting. It’s a lot of formica and cramped spaces, and it didn’t feel personalized enough.

Advertisement

Then it became more of a departure after doing that research, to go back to these artists from the 70s, 80s, and 90s that actually did personalize their buses that way. Led Zeppelin, for example, they had a 747—I think it was called The Starship—it had a completely decked-out lounge with a piano and a fireplace and shag carpeting. Whether they knew it at the time or not, it felt iconic. It was one of those places that everyone wanted to go and be with them. So, how to translate that to Lestat? I wanted the dichotomy, as you said, of this flippant reaction to not caring how the rest of the band or everyone else was faring down below: he was going to make his space the inviting, seductive lounge that he wanted it to be. Rolin kept using the word “bespoke,” and I think we wanted it to appear like nothing we had seen before.

The downstairs became so fun because we could just throw anything out there and it would feel in place—formica walls and leopard-print rugs. I had seen this one picture of Taylor Swift’s tour bus. It was a regular tour bus, except she brought in her own couch; she liked the comfort of that couch. So we brought in this custom-upholstered, crushed metallic velour couch, and then it broke everyone’s heart when we aged it down with cigarette burns and miscellaneous stains, but it needed to feel crunchy. It was fitting, but it needed to feel appropriate.

And the evolution of that set—how to individualize each of the spaces for each of the band members without actually saying “this is my space.” We tried to do, in our heads, backstory rituals for the characters. I liked the idea of Salamander taking his gum out of his mouth as soon as he got in the bus and just sticking it on the wall, or sticking it on the ceiling, so that became the Fisherman’s Wharf section, just wrapped in chewed gum. And the fact that TC would hang a garland of socks across her bunk bed. There were a series of little customizations to each of them to give a little more of their personality within a greater space.

And then Lestat’s upstairs space—I really struggled with that one. The downstairs? Easy. Upstairs? So difficult, because the combination of glam, luxury, rock and roll, but also classic and elegant—there were all of these clashing styles that needed to come together in that space. We kept changing themes back and forth, and I worked a lot with Lex Wood, our costume designer, because every time I would pick an upholstery fabric and I’d be like “I have it, this is it! It’s so unusual—it’s phenomenally Lestat.” And then she would bring out his costume and be like “he’s going to disappear into the sofa—that’s exactly what he’s wearing in this scene.” Okay, back to the drawing board! Here we go again.

But I think, ultimately, it made it better to go through all of those drafts and those versions, having input from all of these people… I had this idea for a shower that would open and it would be Botticelli’s [Venus] painting but Lestat is the one on the shell, so it was like “check me out, I’m phenomenal and amazing.” And as things started breaking down in terms of space, one of my concept artists said, “What if the chandelier is a shower?” I was like, oh my god, that’s brilliant—that’s so unusual. Having the collaboration from all these different people to come in and bring their ideas made it more special.

Advertisement

Lestat Is Not Afraid of Standing Out—And That Iconic Shower Creates New Avenues for Exhibitionism

SM: Love that shower. It feels almost ethereal—like, it shouldn’t exist in the middle of this bus, on the top deck no less, but it works because everything around Lestat feels a little bit magical. He’s an ethereal being moving through this space.

AC: There were two things that I loved about that. One was, we made the windows on either side of the shower taller. Rolin and I had this idea that we were never able to actually shoot: we wanted this shot of the bus next to a minivan at a stoplight, and just this family gawking up at Lestat, buck naked, showering, because he doesn’t care—it’s a “feast your eyes” sort of thing.

And then, as I’ve been posting online and adding photos of the set so that the fans can see a little bit more, there was someone who—not in a critical way—said “but the shower next to the upholstery, is that going to get mildewy?” Which is brilliant, but I don’t think Lestat would care. He’d just say, “Reupholster them. Change them out.”

I don’t think you’re able to see it, but before the blood shower comes down, from the start, the banquettes are blood-stained along the bottom… It’s just giving a little hint of what’s to come, of what the potential of the space was.

SM: You mentioned working with Lex Wood and the collaboration there. I’m curious, how much did you want the costumes and the design to work harmoniously together, or did you want any clash there because Lestat is such a chaotic and loud character?

Advertisement

AC: I always say that with production design, if you’re noticing it, I’m not doing it well. I think it should feel very natural, and it should never take away from the character or the story. With something like this, it’s context and it should be flashy to a degree, but from the start, the rule that Rolin, Hannah [Moscovitch, executive producer/writer], Lex, and I came to was always make Lestat pop from everything.

Lex and I did have conversations on the side about moments where we thought his character wouldn’t necessarily want to stand out, or wouldn’t be ready to stand out—if there was any hesitation on his part. We were able to pick and choose those moments. I’ve never had such a collaborative experience with a costume designer before. Lex knew Lestat and knew Sam in a way that I didn’t, so for her to bring in her reasoning as to why she was bringing in those colors or those patterns—sometimes it altered the design, because I was like well, this is the right thing to do; he really should stand out, or he really should blend in.

But the tension was always, always keep your eye on Lestat. Any time he walks into a room, the eye should always go to him. That was the bible rule we all needed to follow.

Lestat’s Apartment in Montreal Balances Culture and Comfort (With a Touch of Louis)

SM: I want to talk a little about Lestat’s home in Montreal that we see in the first episode. After two seasons of seeing him in the past, it’s almost jarring to see him in this cozy, modern space wearing a comfy sweater. But the closer you look, the more you realize it’s him, just contemporized. What was your starting point for that space—what were the details you knew you needed for it to feel Lestat, and were there some surprising little twists you wanted to pull in for this modern version of him?

AC: I started with Mara’s work in season one. The space that she had designed for him was so lush and detailed; the color was incredibly rich. The conversation that I had with Rolin when I was pitching his space was that it always felt like, in the past, he is hiding his true self; he is assimilating into the time, into the culture, into the style and fashions. Now that he doesn’t have that hang-up anymore—even less after he becomes a musician, but even when we see him before the book comes out—he is finally able to be himself in a way that isn’t hiding away from the public eye. To me, then, Lestat is someone who lives incredibly boldly. I didn’t want to shy away from very bold and obnoxious choices. So I took Mara’s work and I just pumped up the volume and threw some nuclear waste on it, just to see what would happen, what would that reaction be?

Advertisement

I started with the music room. That was basically the one place that I really wanted to use red, and I made the room completely monochromatic. The walls and the ceiling are gloss red; the carpet is an ochre red. Even the drapes are red with zebras on it. I wanted it to feel warm and like a space of creation, so when my decorator, Summer Gaal, and I started going around what his house would be, we started with the music room. We thought that would be the beginning of all his ideas and creation. We knew it needed to be something that a very cultured person would have. He’s been around for a very long time—not that old vampires are automatically cultured and elegant, but more that he does come from an aristocratic background. He has lived a life of wealth and fame for 200+ years. So, I wanted it to be able to say, “I don’t need to own the most expensive painting. I want a painting that I react to.” And what are the variety of items that he’s reacting to across the centuries that he has lived and across all the different cultures and places that he has known?

My decorator found this gorgeous, kind of collapsing oversized purple couch, and that didn’t fit at all. It wasn’t elegant. It wasn’t anything special. (It actually was—my decorator told me afterward that it’s apparently some very famous sofa that I had no idea about!) But it felt like a place where he could crawl up with his boots on and just strum his guitar to just give him the cocoon, that sort of comfort that he’s always, I think, been looking for.

And from there, the living room: what is that contrast, what is the place of seduction? Very early on in one of the scripts, Lestat was in a book club and they were reading the book with select characters, and I thought, how ridiculous is this that this character is having a book club to complain about his ex-boyfriend’s book? So what does that space look like? It’s the contrast to the music room: it just needs to be hard and soft, warm and cold, little nods to the theater life with the pulled drapery with the view to the street.

Obviously the painting… The Lovers [René Magritte, 1928] with the veiled, covered faces. That was something that one of my graphic designers brought to me and she said “you know, I think we can get this painting,” and all of a sudden, it just completely clicked. It’s the veil; it’s the fact that we don’t know who that person is. It just made sense to have that particular painting in place. And we found this one Canadian artist who did a painting that is a bit multimedia, and he’s basically pulling his chest apart… Everything started having all this symbolism to it, where it’s him bearing his soul; it’s the veil; it’s the sexual coffee table that he can put his feet on. All of these things started coming together, and honestly, it was not easy. I was freaking out about colors for the longest time.

Also, in my career, I’ve been very fortunate to have multicultural characters in my stories, in my sets. And this couldn’t be a space that was only going to be for Lestat. I think he would have made it, to a degree, for Louis [Jacob Anderson] as well. So, how does Louis’ persona fit in here? Is this a space that would welcome him? What does his skin tone look like against these colors? All of those little things need to be kept in mind to make the place complete.

Advertisement

Lestat’s Complicated History Is Woven Into Every Set That Cubillan and His Team Crafted This Season

SM: I know there were a few details this season that you really fought for. You’ve mentioned online that for Lestat’s childhood bedroom, you were adamant about needing the (more expensive) tiled flooring to represent how his family looks down on him like a servant. Were there other elements like that that maybe didn’t make sense to people when you first described them, but you knew they were Lestat?

AC: Yes and no. Rolin gives us an incredible amount of trust, and from the start, he has said “we hire the people that we know are going to tell the story the way that we want.” Some of the details I needed to press for because they felt so incredibly appropriate; others, I got no pushback on. Even when things were getting hectic and the budgets were coming in, Rolin kept saying “Just keep going. You’re designing for Lestat. You’re designing for this character. Keep doing you.” That was incredibly comforting—not that I’m doubting my choices, but more about being the newcomer to this family of people that have lived and breathed these characters for so long. I wanted to do it justice. I wanted to be able to bring a part of myself and what I envision for this character.

In that room [the childhood bedroom], for example, I had a perfect color story for the rafters that we never see. It was all these same dusty colors that I had picked for the chateau; they were the same colors for his modern world. Some of these things you’re going to see, others you’re not. I don’t think that the audience is necessarily going to make that connection, but for me, I felt it was important to have it so I could justify in my head the evolution of the character.

In his room, I’ve mentioned that it’s the period version of the quintessential little boy’s room, but how does that clash with pale pink painted ceilings? It should never look easy. It should never look straightforward. There needed to be a push and pull between two things constantly.

In the Paris apartment, which you get a glimpse of in episode three, we were trying to think of what kind of a place do Lestat and Nicki [Joseph Potter] share in this blissful beginning of their relationship, and how does that space then evolve when Lestat becomes a vampire and has this access to wealth? We wanted it to feel incredibly romantic… Our backstory was that they are squatting in a former aristocrat’s house. They’re in one of these gorgeous apartments in Paris; the owners have been taken to the guillotine, and now this gorgeous architecture exists for two lovers to share in front of the fireplace, and all they need is a mattress on the floor and each other. That’s all they need—and how does that then evolve into the beauty and the wealth that we see later?

Cubillan Personally Tested All the Coffins in The Vampire Lestat and Has Some Questions About the Cuntessa’s Cuddle Etiquette

SM: I could pick your brain all day but I’ll end on a fun question (maybe morbid, but hopefully fun). If you yourself were a vampire and you had to design your own coffin, what kind of details would you want for yourself?

Advertisement

AC: Oh man, that is a really tough question.

In terms of the morbid thing, I didn’t necessarily find it morbid. I tried all of the coffins that we made. I tried Lestat’s golden coffin; I tried the period coffins you’ll see later. I think there’s something so cocoon-like about them. I kept making this argument about why we see Louis and Armand in season two in the bed. I understand why, due to the lore or back in the day, they’d want to sleep in a coffin, but nowadays, [get] electric shutters and you can sleep in the comfort that you want. But there’s something incredibly safe and quiet about these spaces that I think is regenerative. I sort of grew to understand why Lesat would want to maintain this element of his past, and that’s something that cannot be let go of. It’s sort of a safe space.

As for myself, I wouldn’t go as far as Lestat. It would have to be something a little [Ludwig] Mies van der Rohe, maybe a little Frank Lloyd Wright—in terms of the Mies van der Rohe simplicity of materials, but then the craftsmanship of Frank Lloyd Wright. I think having something that’s really detailed in the wood, in the carving, but can be incredibly modern and simplistic, that would be my ideal. However, it needs to be big. It needs to be a jumbo coffin. I kept thinking to myself, why would he have such a tiny coffin that he can’t bring anyone into? [Laughs] It needs to be at least made for two.

SM: Well, we know that Lestat is fine with an elevator or wherever for that activity, so maybe the coffin is purely for sleep.

AC: Exactly. There’s a scene in season one where Claudia notices that Louis gets up out of his coffin and gets into Lestat’s coffin, and I was like, oh my god, how are they both fitting in there? Like, how? [Laughs] Even if it’s just cuddling, that feels so tight and uncomfortable! So I would want at least a full, if not a double coffin.

Advertisement

Lestat De Lioncourt’s Portrait – Anne Rice’s The Vampire Lestat – Photo Credit: Photo Credit: Sophie Giraud/AMC

Lestat Might Be a Butterscotch Bitch, But Designing for Him Was an “Absolute Joy”

SM: Great answer, very practical! Thank you so much for speaking with us—we’re big fans of the series and it’s such a thrill to talk about the craftsmanship that went into it.

AC: I want to mention one thing… This show has sort of spoiled me for future shows, simply because of, not just the trust coming from our showrunners and our producers, but because of the collaborative element that I had with both of our cinematographers, every director. Everyone cared so much about the story. Nothing was flippant… There was nothing that felt thrown away. Everything had to be completely meaningful.

Lex and I worked incredibly well together, and [makeup department head] Tami Lane, that evil genius that she is, because everyone had a different piece of Lestat that they kept putting together. As the newcomer to the team, all of a sudden, it just made that character so much more whole, and it made him an absolute joy to design for.

SM: I really do feel that the newcomer perspective aids this season, because we are seeing this reframed version of Lestat. He can’t be the same as we’ve seen, and he’s so special here… But then, I’m a Lestat apologist.

AC: I was always more of a fan of Lestat than I was of Louis and Armand. It seemed so much more fun to be him. And in this, Sam just goes right for the jugular. He bares his soul—and not just his soul, but Lestat’s soul. It was absolutely magnificent to see him on set and not just own every room that he walked into, but emote the hell out of every single line, every single song lyric, every note. He was absolutely heartbreaking in the best way, and I was so happy to be a part of it.

New episodes of The Vampire Lestat drop Sundays on AMC and AMC+.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Interviews

Brittney Greer Discusses the Slasher Inspirations Behind ‘Happy Halloween’

Published

on

Viewers will sometimes dismiss indie, lower-budget movies, especially slashers, as copies of a copy. However, this was not my reaction to Brittney Greer’s Halloween-themed teen slasher movie Happy Halloween. The film had won Best Feature Film at the Berryville Film Festival and was obviously made with a lot of heart and passion for horror. I was excited to speak with the writer/director to share what I took away from her movie.

Happy Halloween is a thoughtful love letter to the slasher subgenre. This was evident from numerous horror easter eggs, including closing credits in the same style as Scream, bloody messages spilled from the same vein as Urban Legend, and a festive jack-o-lantern-filled set piece tipping its hat to Trick ‘r Treat.

When I asked Greer if slashers were her entry point into the genre, she confirmed this was the case. Her love of color came from her dad showing her Killer Klowns from Outer Space at the age of five or six, but the respect and intrigue came from her mother introducing her to Scream.

“My mom showed me Scream [in 1996]. We rented it on VHS right when it came out and I just remember [there was] something about that mask and they were talking about horror films that I heard my dad talking about, my brother talking about, [and] my mom [talking about]… the stuff that you talk about after watching a scary movie…it was something that was just super impactful.”

How Brittney Greer Gave Happy Halloween Its Own Voice

While classic slashers and 90s teen horror movies are in the DNA of Happy Halloween, it does not at all feel like a fan made recreation of any one of them. It is a melting pot, respectfully borrowing from the slasher canon. Besides the aforementioned easter eggs, the editing style (compliments to editor and DP David M. Watson) and score will feel familiar to horror fans, in a good way. She explained part of the reason she wanted to make this movie was that “[she] wanted more Halloween movies.” I asked her what the challenges were to adding her own voice to an already packed slasher subgenre.

Advertisement

“There’s only seven stories out there. And it’s what you’re bringing to it [that’s] going to make it different…You’re not going to have anybody create new stories, [but] new things added into it…The heart of it is all going to kind of feel the same. And I think with a lot of horror films, especially slashers, I feel like you have to have some [stereotypical] characters in there because you have a very short period of time to allow your audiences to know who you’re dealing with and who you’re talking to. And with me, with slasher films, I think it’s helpful because there’s been so many fantastic slasher films, that you can [approach it with] who’s going to be my Tatum type character who has so much heart.”

(Kagan, final girl Hadley, Payton, Adam [left to right])

Creating Authentic Teen Characters in an Indie Slasher

Independently produced movies come with certain expectations, such as not being familiar with the cast. However, Greer successfully cast a group of youngsters that authentically come off as good high school friends. The dynamic between two main couples, Kagan, who’s dating final girl Hadley, and the final girl’s BFF Payton with Adam, didn’t take much screen time to understand they are close friends who rely on each other.

Reimagining the Final Girl Through Hadley’s Trauma

The new element I was excited to see in Happy Halloween was the final girl Hadley (Emma Reinagel), who had already been through her own horror movie, and we are now getting caught up with her. I have honestly always wanted to see this in a non-sequel slasher. Proving further that Greer is tapped into the slasher fan’s psyche.

“First off, thank you for saying that. That was definitely the intention behind it. It’s just one of those things, again, being a horror movie fan… you see these people and these horrific things happen to them, and you get sequels, and that’s honestly where it came from. [In] sequels, there are no scars. You’d have mental scars. You’d probably be on medications….I’m not a huge fan of the Rob Zombie Halloween movies, but in the sequel, we see Laurie who is scarred up, and she is very broken…I’ve always wondered why we do not see these people with scars… Or why are they not in therapy? [It was something] I wanted to see with Happy Halloween. So when I was writing it, I was thinking, what gets this girl back into this town? What can we do that gets her back here? What could have happened to her?… [Her] character that comes back [is] very much not who these people remember [and] she’s coming back into the mix [with] this friend group.”

Where to Watch Happy Halloween and Hear the Full Brittney Greer Interview

I had a ball picking out the horror homages and getting to nerd out with Brittney. You can find Happy Halloween (2024) on VOD anywhere you digitally rent your horror movies. You can also check out my full interview with Brittney Greer on my podcast Autopsy of a Horror Movie anywhere you find podcasts.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria