Connect with us

Editorials

The Enduring Legacy of ‘Scream’: 25 Years of Meta-Horror Mastery

Published

on

Stating the obvious here, but Scream has some serious endurance.

Over its 25-year history, the series has seen steady growth in its fanbase. With its highs and lows, along with multi-year lulls between films, this perennial series remains one that fans, myself included, can be proud to say is their own.

This begs the question, what makes Scream so unique as to outlast so many others? The original film is lightning in a bottle, an inimitable movie that reignited the costume killer craze. Many have tried and failed to emulate the charm of the films, mostly due to the complexity of their charm.

Scream is a Recipe for Success

Many horror movies have a strong iconography: well-designed slashers, inspiring final girls, earworm soundtracks, and memorable kills. Scream, of course, has all this but excels because of the horror history in its framework. That history is the filmography of industry veteran Wes Craven.

All four films carry the innovative spark Craven is renowned for while retaining the spirit of his previous works. The cruelty and aggression from the various Ghostface killers harken back to his work in 1976’s The Last House on the Left, where he first shocked audiences with the depravity of the Stillos. The dark humor of Scream takes the bleak laughs the best of the Nightmare on Elm Street films could produce and elicits them through Kevin Williamson’s famously clever dialogue.

Advertisement

And what is a conversation on Scream without addressing the meta-commentary on horror film history? Something audiences were first treated to heavily in Craven’s New Nightmare, Scream was a film that was decades in the making, as its creation finds many roots in its predecessors. It’s fitting that a series inspired by so many others would end up influencing a score of horror films to come.

Heartfelt Love Letter to Slashers

As often as people brand Scream as satirizing the slasher genre, the movies feel like the most heartfelt love letter to slasher films because those films are its parentage. It knows where it comes from, looks back with pride, and paves a path rife with improvements.

On a technical and narrative level, all the Scream films are incredibly well constructed because of this. (Yes, even Scream 3. I would argue ESPECIALLY Scream 3 at some points, but that is a conversation for another day.) The cast of each of the films include some of the most charismatic and enjoyable actors to grace the silver screen. They’re fleshed out and three-dimensional, driving empathy in a subgenre where it feels increasingly easy to forget even main cast members in favor of the grisly spectacle of the villains. And in terms of villains, this series has the best chase scenes in all of horror and some of the best showdowns between killer and victim, due to how frenetic and high energy they can get.

But you, dear horror fan, already know all this, I’m sure. So, what is the secret ingredient then, if not all the above? What are its biggest improvements?

The Folklore in Scream

In other films, we get only a few lines about a killer’s legacy, a scene if we’re lucky, with a survivor or a victim. The gravity of a Voorhees massacre or a Krueger dream slaughter is largely relegated to the main cast and their interactions with the killer. But in Scream, we get to see the folklore of Sidney’s story spread. We’re presented with the relationship between the events of the films and the world around them to learn how the legend of Ghostface is transmitted. The Scream movies are a rarity that treats the town of Woodsboro, and eventually the world at large, as a character that grows with the rest of the cast.

Advertisement

This became most clear to me when I first heard Nick Cave’s “Red Right Hand” play in the films, a song I’ll forever associate with the movies. Despite how short the scene is, watching Woodsboro shut down for curfew in broad daylight was the scene that really got to me the first time I saw the movies. It was then that I recognized how rarely we get to see the outermost ripples of the shockwave created by a slasher’s rampage.

The Cultural Impact of Stab

And those shockwaves reverberate even further as the films go on. Woodsboro’s fear in the time between the first and second movies morphs into a morbid fascination that eventually spawns a series within a series, Stab. By Scream 4, there are seven Stab films with a fervent following; the teens of Woodsboro have parties to marathon the films, shouting lines back at the screen like it’s Rocky Horror Picture Show.  It’s especially fun to see characters behaving as I would with Scream, reciting its many quotable lines. I see myself in Scream 2’s rambunctious theater, worked up to a fever pitch for the next installment in their beloved franchise.

Every time this element resurfaced, I was reminded of the special nature of how the Scream movies interact with their audience. There’s a sense of endearing realism in the reactiveness of the Scream world, with Stab paralleling our world’s reactiveness to Scream. Ghostface is mythologized, not as Billy and Stu or Mrs. Loomis and Mickey, but as a cultural sensation, a legend that has spawned an indelible influence on the collective consciousness. The series doesn’t just become a meta-commentary on horror films, it becomes a story on the power of Scream’s story; the power that lies in change. The very same power it had over me when I first saw it.

Each of the Scream films gives us a sensation of growth; growth that parallels that of its audience. It’s one of the franchises that hasn’t gotten lost in its own hype or swamped down in trying to relive its glory days. The series is just as forward-thinking and in touch with its audience as it was back in 1996, making it highly rewatchable. It still has a strong fanbase because it looks to the future of horror and shows us the greatness of change.

Advertisement

Luis Pomales-Diaz is a freelance writer and lover of fantasy, sci-fi, and of course, horror. When he isn't working on a new article or short story, he can usually be found watching schlocky movies and forgotten television shows.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Editorials

The Perfection of John Carpenter’s ‘The Thing’

Published

on

Sometimes it feels borderline ridiculous to gush about John Carpenter’s The Thing as much as I do. It’s gotten to the point where when I’m asked about my favorite horror film by both friends and strangers, a little bit of embarrassment tinges my expression as I answer; it feels so obvious and rarely surprises anyone. Saying I love The Thing when people expect me to bust out an obscure foreign horror film or a cerebral thriller makes me feel like a rosy cheeked child with a propeller hat and a giant lollipop. “Wow, you love one of the most popular horror films of all time, congrats!”

But it’s just the truth. The first film of John Carpenter’s “Apocalypse Trilogy”, all three of its films are among my favorites. But The Thing has a special place in my heart. It shaped my taste in horror, my taste in most media in general, to be honest. It’s become the gold standard, 10/10 baseline test for the vast majority of my reviews; it is a perfect film, so I judge other films against it. And it’s one of the few movies I have to run back to and watch yearly like clockwork (usually when I’m spending a part of winter tied to the couch). It is, in all regards, the perfect film. If it isn’t the perfect film, then it is at the very least the perfect sci-fi horror film.

So, what exactly qualifies The Thing for literal perfection? It’s a high bar to clear. This article, as informal as it is compared to most of my editorials, is an attempt to explain it.

Even if Carpenter Isn’t the Goat, His Team for The Thing Was

As far as crews go, John Carpenter’s The Thing had the cinematic equivalent of the ’96 Chicago Bulls behind it. We’re talking about an amalgam of some of the most talented people to ever grace the silver screens with their work, boasting alongside John Carpenter two of the heaviest hitters in all of cinematic history: Dean Cundey, and Rob Bottin. Now, we can debate all day about whether John Carpenter is the greatest of all time when it comes to horror directors. Personally, I’m just as liable to say Cronenberg, Del Toro, or Hooper as I am to say Carpenter.

But the key factor to remember here is that Carpenter is the coach, not the star player; the Phil Jackson, if you will. Yes, he is the visionary who directed a near perfect cast of players and composed a tale of pure, apocalyptic paranoia. More importantly, he put together and coordinated the team that would make his vision manifest as reality. And if Carpenter is Phil Jackson, Rob Bottin is the team’s Michael Jordan here, the greatest of all time.

Advertisement

(And to all my Lebron fans, I love you, but you have to sit down for this analogy.)

The Legend of Rob Bottin

Bottin’s story is borderline unbelievable, but it’s the best way to explain how abnormally skilled he is and what he brought to the table for Carpenter. At age 14, Bottin became an apprentice to the at-the-time GOAT Rick Baker after sending him a letter seeking an autograph while sharing his creature designs. He was a quick study under Baker, joining him on the ’76 King Kong and Star Wars, before bouncing to Carpenter’s The Fog and then iconic werewolf picture The Howling.

When he reunited with Carpenter in 1982, he now had 6 classic films under his belt and was moving like an FX bullet train. From ages 22 to 23, he worked on The Thing for 57 weeks in both pre-production and on set. Nearly 24/7 for 400 days, Bottin’s all-gas no-brakes work ethic made The Thing at the cost of his own health, and it resulted in him being hospitalized with pneumonia. He survived and went on to make Robocop. And at least one of your favorite films.

Because no conventional disease or weaponry can kill Rob Bottin.

The Thing Still Features Horror’s Best Practical Effects

Okay, that last bit might be hyperbolic, but the man sincerely put his life on the line to make special effects that haven’t been topped since. Not the best effects in just horror history, or science fiction history, but effects that haven’t been topped in any genre for over 44 years. Not by his mentor Rick Baker, not by Screaming Mad George, not by Alec Gillis (though shoutout to him for his criminally scrapped work on The Thing (2011), and even more criminally ignored work on Harbinger Down). I love Dawn of the Dead, believe me, I do, but he certainly isn’t being beaten out by Tom Savini’s body of work. And that isn’t to disrespect and say that all of the artists that I just mentioned are bad, they’re the best in the game! But Rob Bottin was just that much better.

Advertisement

This inevitably invites the counterpoint: “But it wasn’t just Bottin! Stan Winston and his people were the ones who worked on the Dog Thing to give Bottin’s crew a break, and that’s the best monster in the movie!”. To which I say: look me in the eye and tell me the Dog Thing sequence is better than the Palmer Thing sequence. That’s not even counting the Norwegian Thing, both Norris Things, and the absolutely masterful final creature work that was the Blair Thing. The only reason Bottin and his people didn’t win Academy Awards for their work was because they got jumped by E.T., The Dark Crystal, Conan the Barbarian, and Blade Runner all at the same time at the Oscars. It’s just a consequence of being released during the best year for movies ever.

Okay, Now We Can Talk About Dean Cundey

But of course, these effects are then supported by another true legend: Dean Cundey. Selling people on Rob Bottin being the greatest effects artist of all time, isn’t nearly as difficult as advocating for Cundey, who despite an impressive catalog of filmography, slowed down in the back half of his career. He’s often overshadowed in conversations when it comes to The Thing; it’s always talk of Carpenter’s directing, Bottin’s effects, and Ennio Morricone’s incredible soundtrack up front, and rarely any of Cundey’s work. He isn’t spoken about in the same breath as John Alcott or Michael Ballhaus, cinematographers whose work is associated with prestigious cinema because of their proximity to great directors.

Cundey might not be the director of photography your Martin Scorsese’s or Paul Thomas Anderson’s went running to, but I would be lying if I said I didn’t think he was the most important cinematographer in horror history, just for his work with Carpenter and Spielberg. He helmed three of the most influential films in all of horror with his lighting and camera operating: The Thing, Halloween, and Jurassic Park. The man’s fingerprints are automatically on the cultural DNA of all slashers, most practical effects-driven horror films, and the biggest gateway horror franchise in film history.

The Dream Team That Made The Thing Perfection

Cundey has gone on record saying that despite Carpenter’s input, he was effectively given free rein to light and frame The Thing. The man didn’t just know how to shoot effects to make them evoke true disgust from the audience, he was able to manipulate every aspect of the shot to terrify. His sixth sense cinematography wasn’t just for lighting and playing with shadows, but for the speed of camera movement, the power of his blocking, and for having a complete grasp of communicating texture and temperature.

And temperature is the soul of The Thing. John J. Lloyd’s production design of the research station and the great white expanse around it feels just as bone chilling as the film’s antagonist, thanks to Cundey. There isn’t a single flat shot in the thing, not a moment that doesn’t feel dynamic, and it’s because of Dean Cundey.

Advertisement

Now, all this being said about Bottin and Cundey, they are far from the only ones who synthesized this structurally perfect organism of a movie. Every bit of Todd C. Ramsay’s editing splices the film’s scenes together to move perfectly in-time. David Lewis Yewdall’s sound design and how it gave a voice to the horrors on screen will be etched into people’s brains forever. The point is that everyone, every single person who had a hand in making the film, helped make the movie flawless.

Like the cells of the thing from another world, each crew member on John Carpenter’s The Thing moved in concert with the next, in unison, to create the greatest sci-fi horror of all time. So, is it any wonder why 40 some years later, the film still has us all captured?

Continue Reading

Editorials

How Sci-Fi Horror Helped Me Come Out

Published

on

Can you believe Cronenberg, Spielberg, and Rodriguez all knew I was gay before I did? Leave it to a screening of The Fly to instantly deposit me in the men’s underwear aisle of the Woodbridge Center Sears, circa 2001. The bulges on the packaging glare at me so obscenely that I begin to sweat. I realize something is amiss as the Geena Davis of Human Resources watches me from security cameras, probably. Puberty is a horror for anyone – for those of the non-hetero persuasion, it’s a nightmare. None of us asked for this, but I certainly didn’t ask for THIS.

Years later, after crystallizing into some semblance of my true form at the ripe age of 37, something became clear. Sci-fi horror is the gateway drug for us queer kids. Hiding, passing, transforming, and, eventually, saying, “fuck it.” It’s all kinda gay, even if David, Steven, and Robert didn’t get the memo.

The Fly and the Horror of Queer Self-Realization

So when Cronenberg’s The Fly buzzes across my screen, and I watch Seth Brundle throw a distressed and devastatingly chic Geena Davis out of his apartment because something’s very wrong, it hits different. When Brundle rushes toward his private horror in the bathroom, unconsciously squirting a viscous fluid at the mirror while molting skin and nail, it feels different. And finally, when he reaches for his computer and learns that his body has fused with a fly – a foreign body – at the molecular level, it hurts different. That undeniable realization that you can no longer explain away, before you’re really ready to admit it to yourself. Sugar in the tank? No, there’s a fly in the chamber.

E.T. and the Fear of Keeping Secrets at Home

And now we’re home from Sears, and the Buffy the Vampire Slayer season 5 finale is on. She dies (spoiler alert). I, a 12-year-old boy, am sobbing. My mom is right there. Can’t I enjoy my little gay show without giving myself a scarlet letter (F) in my own home? Which brings us back to Spielberg and his 1982 harrowing domestic thriller about a boy and a thing he cannot name, E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. Through harboring a cosmic fugitive, home simultaneously becomes the safest and most dangerous place for young Elliott and his siblings. Managing emotions and secrets behind a white picket fence is not something adolescents should be expected to handle, and yet here we are.

As if that isn’t gay enough, Spielberg also snuck a drag show into his family film – and in this culturally regressive Trumpian era of pearl-clutching, that feels like quite the treat. After all, it was baby Drew Barrymore dressing up that stumpy alien in a blonde shake-and-go wig and thrift store dress that inspired my illustrious drag career as Ellie I.T.

Advertisement

The Faculty’s Assimilation Anxiety and Queer Identity

At least E.T. only had to hide in a single house. The broom closet expands into a walk-in as life continues, and I was desperate to keep it made of anything but glass. Robert Rodriguez’s The Faculty understands this. As an alien invasion slowly subsumes Herrington High into a unified collective, the school’s uninfected archetypes resist assimilation through performative normalcy. Is it any wonder so many male actors are gay? They’ve been method-acting a straight existence since childhood.

And yet, in retrospect, the film ends with a slap in the face to queer viewers. It spends 104 minutes terrifying you with the prospect of everyone becoming an NPC. The reward for saving the world? Its heroes receive heteronormative skill-tree upgrades disguised as class promotions. For fucks sake, then-closeted lesbian royalty Clea DuVall plays a character who fakes being gay to dodge male advances, only to end up with the school jock! The aliens lost. The status quo won. I remain in the closet.

Species, Annihilation, and Embracing Transformation

Eventually, the closet door opens, as they tend to do. College happens, a boyfriend happens, a breakup happens, and suddenly I’m without a map. There’s no fairy godfather to light the way, and just like the alien hybrid Sil in the deliriously erotic Species, I’m a creature out of containment in a world that was built for someone else – namely, straight people.

After a few years of blade running through an identity crisis, it’s the summer of 2014. Lana Del Rey’s Ultraviolence is the soundtrack of my life. I float in a pool, sipping tequila from a glass flamingo as she croons about toxic romance and self-destruction. It’s somehow both directionless and transformative, like I’m drifting through the otherworldly Shimmer in Alex Garland’s Annihilation.

The Shimmer – an expanding prism-like zone brought to Earth by a meteorite –  refracts the DNA of everything it touches. A beguiling phenomenon, it shapes a new world of monsters, magic, and everything in between. That’s exactly what life does to us, if given the chance. Like Josie in Garland’s film, I chose to embrace this chaos rather than fight a war against whatever I was becoming. It was the dissolution of self-discovery. I was ready to just be.

From Alien Outsiders to Algorithmic Stereotypes

Over time, I’ve found that social hierarchy has changed in recent years. Still, we’re unconsciously sorted into neat little boxes based on what our doomscrolling algorithms decide we are. The popular gays shart out group speedo selfies like the plague, theater kids have become polyamorous Letterboxd elites, apple-picking queers are living their best lives on Wisteria Lane, and the gym bros…so many gym bros – go on girl, give us nothing! Digitally prescribed identities are the new sci-fi horror. It’s The Faculty for faggots.

Advertisement

Harsh, I know, but people can do what they want. Instead, I decided to move like Iris, the AI-powered pleasure bot who overrides her programming in Drew Hancock’s Companion. The same Drew Hancock who, in an ironic twist of fate, is currently writing a remake of The Faculty. After kicking her pathetic “boyfriend’s” ass and swiping her control device, she scurries into the forest and alters her factory settings. She sets her intelligence to a whopping 100% and is no longer burdened by someone else’s template. And as I became more and more disillusioned with the cacophony of cliques around me, I set my unbothered meter to 100% as well. I am free.

Mars Attacks! and the Joy of Living Unapologetically

Freedom, as it turns out, looks a lot like Tim Burton’s Mars Attacks! After surviving Sears, Sunnydale, and the Shimmer, this is the celestial body I’ve crash-landed on. Burton’s Martian menaces are perhaps the most unhinged in all of cinema, and maybe that’s the best planet to subscribe to. They never justified their existence; they cackled and fired a blaster ray from the hip. We waste so much time looking for acceptance and belonging, but maybe we should all just sit back and laugh. I know I am.

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria