Editorials
We Love a Baddie: A Celebration of Sapphic Villains
Despite the rigid guidelines of the Hays Code, which was active from 1934 to 1968, the horror genre has hosted a bevy of intriguing queer characters. While some of these characters were obviously (although not outright stated) part of the LGBTQ community, others were more of a wink and nudge to queer audience members who would pick up on certain subtleties and nuances that their straight friends would not. Admittedly, queer representation in horror has been a mixed bag, especially in the case of queer women. Still, so many of us hold a special place in our hearts for these films, even when the queer characters are portrayed in a negative light.
By now, it’s pretty much common knowledge that not only have queer people always led the horror genre, but have also always had a spotlight on-screen. Of course, for decades, cinematic queerness (across all genres) had to be hidden in innuendo and subtext. Because of the Motion Picture Production Code, better known as the Hays Code, the depiction of “sexual perversion” (read: homosexuality) was prohibited. The Hays Code also mandated that immorality and criminal activity was to be punished by the end of the film, leaving queer-coded characters often relegated to the roles of villains who meet unenviable ends.
Despite the rigid guidelines of the Hays Code, which was active from 1934 to 1968, the horror genre has hosted a bevy of intriguing queer characters. While some of these characters were obviously (although not outright stated) part of the LGBTQ community, others were more of a wink and nudge to queer audience members who would pick up on certain subtleties and nuances that their straight friends would not.
Admittedly, queer representation in horror has been a mixed bag, especially in the case of queer women. Still, so many of us hold a special place in our hearts for these films, even when the queer characters are portrayed in a negative light.
Or, perhaps we love them because of their villainous status.
For a deep dive on lesbians in horror check out Sapphic Scares!
The Iconic Mrs. Danvers
The 1940 film adaptation of Daphne du Maurier’s novel Rebecca features one of the most famous lesbian villains in horror of all time. Mrs. Danvers (played by Judith Anderson) is introduced when the film’s protagonist, the second Mrs. de Winter (played by Joan Fontaine), moves into the lavish Manderley estate after marrying the charismatic Maxim de Winter. The first Mrs. de Winter, Rebecca, had died a few years earlier, leaving behind a grieving Maxim—and a devastated Mrs. Danvers.
The head housekeeper of Manderley, Mrs. Danvers was, and still is, infatuated and obsessed with Rebecca. She immediately hates the second Mrs. de Winter, believing she’s been brought in to replace her. Mrs. Danvers torments the second Mrs. de Winter relentlessly, pointing out all the ways she falls short of Rebecca’s elegance and beauty. In a famous scene, Mrs. Danvers shows the second Mrs. de Winter Rebecca’s clothing, making a point to emphasize the sheerness of a negligée. “Have you ever seen anything so delicate?” She asks.
The second Mrs. de Winter may be the protagonist of Rebecca, but it’s Mrs. Danvers, often described as the embodiment of the “predatory lesbian” trope, who has become a cultural icon. She’s a woman who harbors an obsessive love for not only her employer, but her female employer. Her married female employer who, before her untimely death, enjoyed adultery and sexy lingerie. Every line of dialogue Mrs. Danvers speaks invites discourse and fan theories: Was her love for Rebecca unrequited? Or is there a reason as to why she’s so well-acquainted with her intimate garments? We know that Rebecca wasn’t one for monogamy—perhaps she was not bound by heterosexuality either.
We Love a Predatory Lesbian
Three decades after Rebecca was released, another horror film with a “predatory lesbian” character hit cinemas, this time with the predatory aspect being literal: Stephanie Rothman’s film The Velvet Vampire. In this 1971 cult classic, the elegant and wealthy vampire Diane LeFanu (played by Celeste Yarnall) lures married couple Susan (Sherry Miles) and Lee (Micheal Blodgett) to her home in a California desert. There, Diane seduces both of them.
The Velvet Vampire came out only three years after the Hays Code was lifted. Thus, the film was able to depict its Sapphic characters in its lurid and glorious entirety. In terms of cinematic representation of queer women, Diane is an absolute gift. She’s neither a hero nor victim; she’s an unapologetically bloodthirsty monster. She’s captivating to watch because she’s a villain and having a great time ruining her targets’ lives. Best of all, her downfall isn’t the result of her sexuality—it’s because of her little hobby of murder and blood-drinking.
Over the past decade, we’ve gotten even more notable Sapphic slayers whose sexuality isn’t the thing that makes them monstrous. In 2014, the Rosemary’s Baby-esque film Lyle, written and directed by Stewart Thorndike, gave us June (played by Ingrid Jungermann), a creative type who makes a deal with a demon to ensure a successful career, using her children, and by extension her wife Leah (played by Gaby Hoffman), as bargaining chips.
Released in 2018, What Keeps You Alive (written and directed by Colin Minihan) presents the story of Jackie (played by Hannah Emily Anderson) and Jules (played by Brittany Allen), another lesbian married couple. It’s an edge-of-your-seat classic tale about killing your spouse for the insurance money, with the added bonus of a “black widow” reveal. Antagonist Jackie is a morbidly fascinating self-admitted psychopath who never loved Jules—because she can’t love at all—and has gotten horrifically proficient at concealing her murderous nature.
The Perfection (written and directed by Richard Shepard) gives us another violent and calculating queer woman—but there’s another angle that makes her stand out. Charlotte (played by Allison Williams) is a former musical prodigy who attended a prestigious academy before dropping out to care for her sick mother. Years later, she meets and connects with Lizzie (played by Logan Browning), a fellow cellist who seems to have replaced her at the school. After a night of clubbing and hooking up, Charlotte slips Lizzie a drug that makes her hallucinate…and then manipulates her into amputating her own arm. It’s extreme, but Charlotte isn’t exactly the villain of the film. It’s later revealed that she was trying to protect Lizzie from falling prey to the same sex cult that had abused her. Before that twist, though, Charlotte lands in the ranks of Sapphic villains we love to watch.
But why do we love to watch them? Queer representation—specifically good representation—in media has been a topic of conversation for years. But “good” representation doesn’t need to mean that the character is a good person. Good, complex character development encompasses heroes, villains, and everyone in between. Let’s be real: antagonists are often more compelling than the “good guys,” and there’s just something particularly thrilling about queer women who get to be wicked—especially when their sexuality isn’t a factor in that.
Editorials
50 Years Later, ‘Black Christmas’ (1974) Is Just as Relevant and Frustrating as Ever
The film opens with Jess Bradford (Olivia Hussey) confronting her boyfriend Peter (Keir Dullea) with the news of her pregnancy, and her plans to have an abortion in light of her career. Let me remind you again, it’s 1974, and even on a 2024 rewatch, no viewer should be surprised when Jess is met with a gaslighting attack. Peter’s attempts were dismissed, but the message and accompanying rage couldn’t be more relevant. Every line of weaponized dialogue from Peter’s mouth is written so well that it’s impossible to ignore even 50 years later.
Horror is the most undoubtable mirror that fictional entertainment has ever seen- I’ll stand on that. It’s known for giving a broad snapshot of what our greatest fears might’ve been at any given time. From climate change to the social and systemic issues in between- it all comes out through fictional stories of horror.
Women across the United States are teetering on the line of a life-threatening regression. Repetition is something that history will always whip around, but when creative minds grab on, we can use their memorialized messages to paint a bigger picture for further education. For the fandom, the time is ripe to look for scholars at the intersection of activism and genre history to guide us through. Take Chris Love, for example; reproductive justice advocate, Arizona lawyer, and “repro horror” scholar.
“We’re so used to seeing abortion being treated as difficult or heart-wrenching. Black Christmas stands out because Jess was so clear and unbothered about her decision to choose herself and her future. That’s how it should be and frankly, how it actually is most of the time”
Bob Clark’s holiday massacre of 74’ is invaluable to horror history. On the side of the genre, it’s the most responsible for our treasured ‘slasher’ sub-genre while pumping the gas on true fears of home and personal invasion. On the side of U.S. history, the film was released only one year after the ruling of Roe V. Wade.
The film opens with Jess Bradford (Olivia Hussey) confronting her boyfriend Peter (Keir Dullea) with the news of her pregnancy, and her plans to have an abortion in light of her career. Let me remind you again, it’s 1974, and even on a 2024 rewatch, no viewer should be surprised when Jess is met with a gaslighting attack. Peter’s attempts were dismissed, but the message and accompanying rage couldn’t be more relevant. Every line of weaponized dialogue from Peter’s mouth is written so well that it’s impossible to ignore even 50 years later.
It’s here, before the fantasy fear kicks in where fans and genre scholars alike can recognize a crossing of an ethical line- a single decision that could greatly impact a woman’s life, career, and comfort. The great thing is women today are more likely to be like Jess, and challenge ideas of patriarchy for their right to decide. Opening our greater horror story with an additional personal one makes Jess’s fight relatable, and even more important- for her survival, and the shot at life she has a right to. Queue the telephone.
I could go on forever about the film’s first act, but the conflict driving Black Christmas is the creep on the other end of those perverted phone calls. Even though this is a separate issue from Jess’s plan for her body, my recent rewatch opened my eyes to the idea that these two conflicts are two sides of the same coin. I’m a woman, and a citizen of the United States. Now that I’ve lost some of my confidence in the protection of reproductive rights, I’ve digested this whole scenario in a different, more infuriating light.
Through the calls, the killer causes panic, and threatens the security of the sorority sisters inside. His remarks are disturbing and sex-obsessed, and the girls react with fear and disgust like any person would. Imagine making all the right decisions to ensure a future of comfort and success, just to have your right to it stripped under the guise of gross misogynistic mental gymnastics. That’s how I feel right now, and I almost can’t believe how smudge-free the mirror is.
In the film’s opening, we witness what an intimate conflict over women’s reproductive rights might look like. Most of the horror community has given the scene their highest praise, but my damage this month was experiencing that those themes don’t actually stop once the calls start. Those themes end up getting stronger by switching from seeing the problem with patriarchal power, to understanding what it feels like to exist trapped underneath it.
History is repeating itself again, and the deja-vu in Black Christmas is tough enough to hand out complimentary whiplash. It’s still disturbing, but as consumers of horror, we know how to trust the final girl. Through just about any period commentary you can find in horror, there’s a final girl who’s survived it- maybe two or three. The truth in that statement holds the most weight at a time like this, though. Cheers to Jess Bradford, and everyone she represents.
Editorials
‘Black Christmas’ (2019): More Hollow Feminism From Hollywood
Black Christmas (2019) opens with so much promise but immediately gets in its own way. What seemed like an attempted indictment of rape culture led to confusion and resentment for me as an audience member. Whatever the original goal is gets buried in black goo at the modernized version of the He-Man Woman-Haters Club.
My entryway to the Black Christmas universe was accidentally watching the 2006 film at an Alamo Drafthouse. My friend and I thought it was the original and wanted to finally see the classic. In our haste, we did not investigate which movie the chain had pulled from the vaults. So, a few years later, when I saw a new Black Christmas in theaters, I asked more questions. I went into the 2019 film knowing it was not the original and with the expectation that it had to be better than the version I had previously seen. I got a wildly confusing take on feminism and a giant red flag planted in the Blumhouse Productions column instead.
The film has an engaging opening that utilizes the winter Christmas atmosphere while giving us a fun enough first kill. There is some cool cinematography (Mark Schwartzbard) and direction (Sophia Takal) on display that make you want to root for this entry so much. There are also glimmers of a movie that understands how ahead of its time the original Black Christmas was and seemingly wants to ride that feminist wave. Sadly, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, and this movie takes the express bus to Satan’s doorstep.
Black Christmas (2019) follows a group of sorority sisters stalked during their Christmas break. They soon discover the cloaked figures slashing their way through sorority girls are part of an underground college conspiracy to “put women back in their place.” This all comes out in a messy third-act battle where it sounds like dialogue was pulled directly from Joe Rogan’s podcast. There is a lot of black goo coming out of the misogynists as Professor Gelson (Cary Elwes) gives the monologue that tries to explain what is happening. I am firmly in the camp of “Yes, all men” and am usually an easy person to win over when a movie wants to talk about toxic masculinity. Yet, this movie had so many problems and fell into what often feels like Blumhouse projects following a checklist that I could not get on board. Especially because long before men try to destroy the squad, we find out the calls are coming from inside the house.
We watch Riley (Imogen Poots) as she is constantly bombarded by her supposed friends who remind her she was sexually assaulted. They follow her to her job and throw it in her face if she hesitates to sign a petition. They have choreographed a Mean Girlsesque Christmas number where they sing about it to supposedly clap back at her rapist. The plan is to perform it in the frat house where Riley was assaulted. When one of the members of this weird choir has to step out, Riley is bullied into performing it by again reminding her she was attacked. On stage, when Riley locks eyes with the guy who assaulted her and freezes. Her bestie whispers, “Rebuild yourself, bitch” before they start the misguided jingle in earnest. When they started singing about “S-E-X” before describing something that was, in fact, rape, it felt like the culmination of this remake’s problems.
While I have no doubt Black Christmas (2019) started with great intentions, its impact undoes all that goodwill. It seems like a muddled brand of feminism wrapped around a bunch of tweets from people who learned about gender studies from broadcast TV. I know many people might have the impulse to write this off and blame the PG-13 rating. However, I am not sure we should be arming tweens with the idea that throwing your friend’s trauma in their face hourly is friendship or feminism. We see Riley have nightmares about this attack that happened three years ago. We know she’s still in the same school with her rapist, and their Greek societies seemingly still host shindigs they both attend. So, seeing how shitty her support system is while yelling about their sisterhood and talking about how they’re all an extension of each other seems hollow.
I questioned Riley’s squad the whole movie, so Helena’s (Madeleine Adams) reveal that she was working for the man was not a gag. If anything, it was refreshing to see at least one of the girls was aware that she was a bad feminist. This twist might have worked if we had not spent the entire run time watching Riley’s best friends treat her like a prop instead of a person. Or, maybe if the male characters had not said all the quiet parts aloud the whole movie. The lack of subtlety and nuance worked against this story. It wore everything on its sleeve, and while on paper, I agree with the sentiments…the result is a confusingly awful time.
I have watched this film three times in my life. Each viewing, I try to figure out who this movie is for. Is it for audiences who are just learning that women are real people? Or is it for execs wanting to make a quick buck off the #MeToo movement without actually doing the work? Each time, I wonder what the original script looked like because I cannot imagine this is the finished product anyone involved wanted. Black Christmas (2019) opens with so much promise but immediately gets in its own way. What seemed like an attempted indictment of rape culture led to confusion and resentment for me as an audience member. Whatever the original goal is gets buried in black goo at the modernized version of the He-Man Woman-Haters Club.