Connect with us

Editorials

Tea Parties with Michael Myers: An Unlikely Friendship

Published

on

It is nearly impossible to find a person who doesn’t love Halloween (1978). The film is a scary introduction to one of the most beloved boogeymen in the business. It is arguably the best film of John Carpenter and Debra Hill’s careers, not for lack of trying. While even the casual observer knows this movie reshaped slashers and wax poetic about the ripples it had throughout pop culture, not everyone can say Micheal Myers was one of their imaginary friends as a kid like I can. 

“I realized that what was living behind that boy’s eyes was purely and simply… evil.” – Dr. Loomis

I started watching horror movies when I was about 4 or 5. As a chronically unhappy kid, they quickly became my escape from the real world. The monsters and murderers who chased final girls and always made sure to stab their annoying boyfriends felt like friends. They showed me that the villain of any good story is the person you’ll want to spend more time with. Because I was severely sheltered, I had no way of knowing that my adventures with Michael Myers were unusual. I probably just appreciated that he was a good listener and was one of the few people I knew wouldn’t yell at me. I would take any Halloween movie I could get my hands on, but even as a child with no understanding of film or the industry, I knew the first one was special.

I, and the trusty TV guide, would hunt Halloween down like I was training to work for the FBI whenever we had cable or satellite. I would catch it as many times, on as many channels, as possible as if my mother hadn’t recorded it on a VHS that I wore out when we couldn’t afford to have more than the standard broadcast channels. As any obsessive horror kid from the 90s can tell you, AMC was the channel to live on during October. Not only were they serving classic horror cinema, but they were also bursting with trivia. They gave me a whole arsenal of cool facts about the scary movies that got me through my childhood. However, the only ones I retained, and remain me with to this day, were about how John Carpenter and company brought this piece of cinema to life.

“Death has come to your little town, Sheriff.” – Dr. Loomis

AMC is where I learned that Micheal’s mask was William Shatner’s face. This is where I learned John Carpenter added the score after a test screening told him the movie wasn’t scary. As a kid, I took that personally even though I was never so much scared as fascinated by this movie. It’s when I found out they filmed in California during the spring, which resulted in them having to bag up their leaves to reuse for other scenes. I felt jealousy as I listened to the stories of Jamie Lee Curtis and the crew bagging up leaves they were rationing while dressed way too warmly for the West Coast. It made me wish I had been alive and in the film industry when it was made so that I could have cool stories too. I wanted to be one of the people who would go on to have these memories and see my name listed in the credits of what I still think is a masterpiece. I sincerely believe Halloween is one of the reasons I can never truly give up on wanting to make a movie. I saw it at an impressionable age, and it instilled in me that an independent movie could change lives.

The Silent, Curious Boogeyman

I know part of my childhood obsession with Micheal was the mask and the way Nick Castle played this silent killer. Unlike my other favorite baddies, this boogeyman seemed curious when he killed people. His walk was steady, and he never seemed in a hurry, even as Laurie Strode was running away from him. He didn’t have any quips or comebacks to lighten the mood. He was about business, and he was damn good at his job. Whatever motivated him to continue chasing his prey was one of the many mysteries that made him even cooler. After all, fear of the unknown is the most unsettling kind of scary. There is no way of rationalizing that it could never happen to you if you don’t know why it is happening. You just have this calm white face with eyes as black as night doing quietly violent things to the town of Haddonfield, Illinois, while being underscored by an anxiety-inducing melody on a keyboard. To this day, no one has ever made a Casio as stressful as John Carpenter. 

Advertisement

“It was the Boogeyman.” – Laurie Strode
“As a matter of fact it was.” – Dr. Loomis

While very few movies ever actually scared me as a child, I did make Michael Myers sit with me for tea parties after all, Halloween did manage to give me this unexplainable thrill. There was a magic tingle in my spine whenever I watched the boogeyman go to work. I think the movie is probably why I like to unwind with a nice slasher when the world feels a little too hopeless. Very few entries into the subgenre will ever reach the heights of the original, including all the films in its franchise that came after. However, much like Mikey, I refuse to give up the chase.

A Lifelong Bond with the Halloween Franchise

So, as you have probably figured out by now, I’m one of the people who will show up to any Halloween movie. I may never understand why, or how, he claimed a piece of my heart during my misspent youth. I used to joke that because I’m one of eight kids, I understand having a few siblings you’d like to get rid of. However, because this bond has lasted for almost my whole life, and through two reboots and a remake, there is clearly something else afoot. 

Much like Laurie Strode, I am forever tethered to this boogeyman. However, I choose to be here and should unpack that…after this year’s marathon of the original movies, of course.

Sharai is a writer, horror podcaster, freelancer, and recovering theatre kid. She is the host of the podcast of Nightmare On Fierce Street, one-half of Blerdy Massacre. She has bylines at Fangoria, HorrorBuzz, NightTide, and she is Co-EIC of Horror Movie Blog. She spends way too much time with her TV while failing to escape the Midwest. You can find her most days on Instagram and Twitter. However, if you do find her, she will try to make you watch some scary stuff.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Editorials

‘It: Chapter Two’ Deserves Better

Published

on

People hate It: Chapter Two. Unlike many horror sequels or poorly reviewed releases that gain popularity in time, the film has seemingly gained more notoriety. Maybe it’s the occasionally goofy CGI, the heavy comedy, or just how overstuffed it is, but everyone is really down and out on it. Still, though, I will defend this movie like a member of the Losers Club defending their Ka-Tet (deep-cut King reference for you constant readers).

But why, though? Objectively, the movie can feel overstuffed. The CGI is a little goofy. Well, despite all this, I believe It: Chapter Two captures the pure essence of the book. It captures the heart, the terror, and metaphors about small town America excellently…even better than the first one.

It: Chapter Two Is the Ultimate Stephen King Movie

Listen…I am a simple man. If you have this much pure Stephen King energy in a movie, I am going to love it. Why King fans did not grasp onto this movie, I do not know, because it is probably the most “Stephen King” Stephen King movie ever.

We have the small, Maine town and characters from the book, yes, but also a fantastic cameo from the big man himself. Seriously, this movie is like Avengers: Endgame for constant readers (even though Castle Rock is technically more of a crossover). The movie has the heart, small-town summer feeling, and aesthetics for a King film to the max. Whether that is a positive or negative depends on the viewer, but constant readers can relish in how set the movie is on capturing King’s Americana.

It: Chapter Two Understands the Stephen King Novel

Yes, the movie is sillier than the first installment. It’s technically less proficient and cleaner than its predecessor. Still, this movie just generally captures both the message and energy of the book. Don’t get me wrong, It (2017) is excellent in that it feels like a haunted house walkthrough. There are lots of different entities Pennywise dresses up as to attack. It’s colorful, fun…but it takes a lot of liberties. This is fine, but It: Chapter 2 painstakingly portrays the deeper undercurrents and plot beats of the novel.

Advertisement

The Horror Beneath It: Chapter Two

It has always been a story about the darkness behind America’s suburban facade. Behind all of the killer clown and creature feature/cosmic fun, it is about how America’s past will always linger, and is always darker than any fictional entity. It: Chapter 2 does not shy away from its portrayal of bigotry, or its bigger messages about racism and America’s past. The first one has elements of it, but really, Chapter 2 feels like it peels back the kid’s-on-bikes stuff to get to the nitty-gritty of the story.

Additionally, the movie gets the casting down perfectly. Not saying It did not have some of the best child performances ever, but finding not only worthy adult counterparts, but book-accurate players would have to be an arduous task. Huge shout-out to the casting team for absolutely nailing this.

Bill Skarsgård Makes Pennywise Even Scarier

The whole cast blows this movie out of the water, but Pennywise in this one steals the show. Skarsgard is rarely anything less than excellent, but he gets his true horror laurel here. He plays the role as sinister as possible, landing some humor but never letting it weigh down the fear factor.

He is a force to be reckoned with. When making something like a killer clown movie in contemporary times, you have to be really careful not to make it just straight-up silly. Art the Clown is, of course, pure nightmare-fuel, but when approaching the horror big top, it can unintentionally end up feeling like a mismarketed Goosebumps episode.

This, though, is not a case like that. Pennywise is nightmarish in this. His voice is more sinister, and he reads as a predatory cosmic entity, and not just another slasher villain. Fun and frightening, Pennywise pulls no punches in bringing the horror in Chapter 2.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Editorials

The Mexican Horror Legacy of Rubén Galindo Jr.

Published

on

Rubén Galindo Jr.’s Cemetery of Terror

It’s not unreasonable to think most American horror fans can probably name only one Mexican horror filmmaker: Guillermo del Toro. Given how many fantastic films he’s made and how successful so many of them have been, it’s easy to see how he became a household name, but he’s far from the only Mexican filmmaker with a taste for the macabre. Rubén Galindo Jr. may be a major telenovela producer now, but in the 1980s he wrote and directed independent genre films in Mexico that likely influenced the kind of filmmaker del Toro would become. Galindo Jr. isn’t some obscure figure in Mexican entertainment, but he’s also not as widely known as he should be in horror circles, despite having many of his genre films available from Vinegar Syndrome.

In celebration of Latin Heritage Month, I wanted to shed a light on Galindo Jr.’s films not just because they are a lot of fun, but also because of how underseen they still are. Galindo Jr.’s early films mark a complete departure from the work he does now, so much so that you’d think it’s different people, but his early career genre films were important and part of a familial legacy of both the Galindos and the Cardonas (the royal families of Mexican genre films).

The Galindo Family Legacy in Mexican Horror

Rubén Galindo Jr., as his name suggests, is the son of Mexican filmmaker Rubén Galindo Aguilar. He first entered the film industry as an actor, but joined his family’s production studio to take on a myriad of roles like set designer, accountant, purchasing manager, and more. His directorial debut in 1969 was for a comedy, Un Amante Anda Suelto, and was the first of 47 films he would direct. While his focus wasn’t explicitly horror, he did direct a couple of films starring  Luchador and actor Santo, as well as many Mexican westerns before focusing more on distribution in the 1980s. Coincidentally, around the time his young son, Galindo Jr., would begin his own filmmaking career.

Rubén Galindo Jr.’s Journey Into Mexican Genre Cinema

Galindo Jr. began his filmmaking career by leaving his hometown of Mexico City to attend UCLA, only to return to CDMX in 1983 after graduating with a degree in Film and Television Arts & Sciences. His first film, Cementerio Del Terror, was a huge hit despite being a modest production, and it was the first of many independent horror films Galindo Jr. would take on. While his legacy won’t be built upon the work he did in genre, it certainly started there and evolved beyond the underground and into the mainstream over time.

Cementerio Del Terror (1985): Rubén Galindo Jr.’s Horror Debut

Galindo Jr.’s first film is by far one of his most uneven, but in the same vein, also one of the most entertaining. It starts like so many great horror flicks do: on Halloween, as a group of kids decides to steal a body from the morgue, only to disrupt the ghoulish ghost of a serial killer. While graverobbing isn’t exactly the kind of thing many do for fun, this particular endeavor is in service of a satanic ritual that will go awry, thus leading to all kinds of bloodshed and demonic appearances. There’s a sub-plot involving some premonitions of the killer returning from the dead that go ignored, reasonably so, and where things land is your standard house/cemetery of horrors where the kids are met with all kinds of devious and dastardly demons.

The Horror Influences Behind Cementerio del Terror

With a reported budget of 45-65 million pesos (roughly $275,000-$540,000 US dollars), filming started in 1984, and Galindo Jr. was able to wrangle in well-known Mexican actor Hugo Stiglitz to star in the production. The film was a huge success for Galindo Jr., even if it wasn’t well-received by critics at the time. Galindo Jr.’s influences are apparent in terms of both content and style, as he clearly draws inspiration from John Carpenter’s Halloween and Sam Raimi’s Evil Dead. There’s also a heavy helping of Romero’s Night of the Living Dead, even if the ghouls at play here aren’t the zombified kind. It’s truly a smorgasbord kind of horror film that never fully commits to one idea, but knows how to weave them together well enough to be entertaining.

Advertisement

The practical effects may seem ropey by today’s standards, but context and time would dictate that these are quite good considering the circumstances and how much of a trailblazer Galindo Jr. was for making this kind of film at this time in Mexico.

Time has been far kinder to this film than critics were, as it averages a 3.0 on Letterboxd and is the recipient of a now sold-out edition from Vinegar Syndrome. In terms of ranking, this is probably B-Tier for Galindo Jr., which is impressive for a debut feature regardless!

Rubén Galindo Jr.'s Dimensiones Ocultas

Dimensiones Ocultas (Don’t Panic) and Its Influence

Perhaps the best-known of Galindo Jr.’s early genre films, Don’t Panic is without a doubt his best horror effort, and his most derivative. If Cementerio del Terror was riffing on two horror classics, Dimensiones Ocultas riffs on another. This time, it’s Wes Craven’s A Nightmare on Elm Street. Following very similar story beats, we follow Michael, who, on his 17th birthday, uses a Ouija board with his friends and accidentally unleashes a demon. This demon isn’t your ordinary run-of-the-mill possession type; no, this demon haunts you in your dreams! Michael sees these murders before they happen and tries to warn his friends, to no avail.

Why Don’t Panic Remains a Mexican Horror Cult Favorite

There’s a lot to love about Dimensiones Ocultas, and it’s not hard to see why it has become Galindo Jr.’s most notable genre film. From the strange kid-print adult-sized pajamas that Michael wears to the incoherent plotting, it’s not a film that’s going to appeal to those who prefer tight technical filmmaking and single-threaded plot lines. The characters are hard to take seriously, in part because so many of the voices are dubbed, and if this all sounds like reasons not to like this film, you’re sorely mistaken.

The Elm Street influence is endearing in how sloppily it is transcribed here, but it’s also distinct enough to not feel like a complete rip-off. The demon, Virgil, doesn’t really look like Freddy, but if you squint your eyes after a few drinks, you’d probably not be able to tell the difference. The death scenes are creative and at the same time comedic, so it’s not a film that is easy to take seriously, which is a good thing.

While there are no budgetary numbers that are verifiable, Dimensiones Ocultas shows more ambition in terms of effects and ideas than Cementerio, while not really showing much evolution in terms of screenwriting. Galindo Jr. does have better command of the pacing here, and this too has received the amazing Vinegar Syndrome treatment like Cementerio, but is also sadly out of print. A-Tier Galindo Jr.

Advertisement

Rubén Galindo Jr.'s Ladrones de Tumbas (1989)

Ladrones de Tumbas (1989) A Unique Mexican Slasher

Shortly after Dimensiones Ocultas, Galindo Jr. was back at it, directing his third horror feature, Ladrones de Tumbas. Learning a bit from both of his former features, Ladrones feels far more consistent both in terms of plotting and execution. It does tread familiar ground that harkens back to Cementerio, as a group of teenage treasure hunters unknowingly awaken a malevolent entity hell-bent (literally) on bringing forth the spawn of Satan. The spirit systematically takes out the teens one by one in clever, slasher-centric ways, and while it does feel familiar, it’s never repeating the same stuff seen in earlier Galindo Jr. joints. The effects feel far more accomplished, and the story is much easier to follow, all things considered.

The Forgotten History of Mexican Horror Filmmakers

There’s even less information about this film’s production out there, which is more of a reminder that there is still a woeful lack of study around Mexican horror filmmakers that has penetrated the mainstream. Even in preparing for this article, it’s quite difficult to find trusted sources- hell, any sources besides Wikipedia and IMDb. What we do know happens after Ladrones is that Galindo Jr. would begin his distinction from horror and start making his way West to more dramatic and widely accepted fare. There is one more film that Galindo Jr. would helm for horror, possibly two if you consider Resucitaré Para Matarlos in 1991, before making his big pivot. And you guessed it: the Vinegar Syndrome release of Ladrones is very much out of print. S-Tier Galindo Jr.

Mutantes Del Año 2000 (1992) Rubén Galindo Jr.’s Sci-Fi Horror Experiment

Mutantes del Año 2000 is easily the worst of Galindo Jr.’s genre efforts, and it’s largely because it’s kind of a silly premise. It’s a story about a teacher going through an ugly divorce during a time in the future where pollution is so bad that everyone wears gas masks, and an ex-husband who has been dumping nuclear waste behind the house, mutating the local rodent population. When a giant mutated rat enters the home, the teacher must fight it to stay alive while she’s warding off both the rat and her ex, who wants to keep his nuclear secret. It’s absurd, and it almost feels like Galindo Jr.’s first foray into the more dramatic side of storytelling.

Not only is this one a bit of a slog to get through, but it also loses some of the fun and charm that Galindo Jr.’s previous films exhibited. While the story is a bit more concise and clear, a positive, the delivery leaves a lot to be desired, even if the world-building is somewhat interesting. It’s hard to know, at least without further research or speaking to Galindo Jr. directly, what caused him to fall out of love with genre, but his lack of conviction is apparent here. You can’t fault someone for wanting a change, but I would be remiss not to wonder what it would’ve been like if Galindo Jr. kept refining his abilities for the sake of scares.

Why Rubén Galindo Jr.’s Mexican Horror Films Deserve More Attention

One of the most challenging parts of writing this kind of article is not having enough sources to tell a fully holistic story. Part of this is due to time, as one can only watch so many special features in such a time, but also that there simply aren’t as many primary sources for Mexican horror history and the filmmakers that contributed to it. The fact that so many can’t name more than one Mexican filmmaker says a lot about the lack of information out there, and so if you’re a filmmaker seeking a new topic for a genre documentary, consider Mexican horror. Not only is it fertile ground, but it’s also got a lineage of talent that is still alive to talk about what it was like, something we are reminded of weekly as announcements of deceased horror stars come across our news feeds.

Rubén Galindo Jr. is just one of many who have made their mark on horror in Mexico, and selfishly, I would love to know more about this than what is available. Running a website and working full-time doesn’t leave a lot of time for much else, but it’s important to both remember and celebrate the legacies of those who came before as trailblazers who are just as worthy of our praise as those who become household names.

Advertisement

For more of Matt Orozco’s work, along with many other great horror articles, head on over to Macabre Daily!

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria