Connect with us

Editorials

Unpopular Opinion: ‘Freddy’s Dead: The Final Nightmare’ is a Good Movie

Published

on

It’s no secret. The sixth installment of Nightmare on Elm Street, Freddy’s Dead: The Final Nightmare, is widely regarded as one of the worst NOES films in the franchise. It has a whopping 23% on Rotten Tomatoes, and it isn’t appearing in many horror fans’ favorite movies of all time.

I, a longtime Freddy fan, must inform you that everyone’s wrong for disregarding this film. From start to finish, it gave us the perfect send-off for Freddy.

The Unofficial Theme Song for A Nightmare on Elm Street

As the history of my pitches in the Horror Press Discord will attest, I am a sucker for music used well in horror movies and shows. (If I ever get my way, I’ll do an entire piece on the great songs featured in American Horror Story, but I digress.)

In the first 30 seconds of the movie, before the opening shot, we are played a clip from Goo Goo Dolls’ “I’m Awake Now,” which sings: “Don’t fall asleep to dream. I’m awake now. You can’t touch me. I won’t sleep no more.”

“I’m Awake Now” is one of my favorite songs because it delivered an anti-Freddy anthem that no one realizes is an anti-Freddy anthem unless they’re a Freddy fan. When you ask anyone, “What’s the Nightmare on Elm Street song?” Everyone will always sing the iconic “1, 2, Freddy’s coming for you…” But only a few know this one.

Advertisement

Listen and enjoy the gratuitous Freddy shots in the official music video here.

Freddy’s Dead: The Final Nightmare is as Campy as It Has to Be

As the song clip plays, viewers are introduced to what kind of experience to expect. The film opens with the following quote by Friedrich Nietzsche:

“Do you know the terror of he who falls asleep? To the very toes, he is terrified, Because the ground gives way under him, And the dream begins….” Friedrich Nietzsche

Then immediately follows it with a quote from the man of the hour himself, Freddy Krueger:

“Welcome to Prime Time, bitch.”

Advertisement

This juxtaposition between straight-face horror and silly, campy comedy perfectly captures the film’s essence. Freddy’s Dead has all the elements of a horror movie. As a character suffers from nightmares, aided by a woman trying to help him remember his true identity, we are treated to deaths that make you wince (can you seriously forget about the kid who got a Q-Tip jammed straight through his ear?) a creepy little girl, a mystery, flashbacks… but at the of the day, this is still a Freddy movie. It would be sinful to deliver a Freddy movie that doesn’t make us laugh.

His comedic horror style is one of his redeeming qualities, so the filmmakers cranked that up to 11 for what was supposed to be Freddy’s final film.

Pulling Out All the Stops for the “Final” Freddy Movie

This film instituted the use of Freddy Vision, which was its attempt at providing viewers with a 3D experience. The filmmakers used it sparingly, so no one was left with the awkward cardboard frames on their faces for long (which is more than I can say for other horror movies.) At the very least, doing this created a fun little piece of memorabilia to go along with what was supposed to be Freddy’s final film.

Of course, this movie could be better. It’s not without flaws, and if you can’t enjoy the campiness, you’ll probably find this film unbearable.

There’s a scene where Freddy Krueger uses a video game controller to bounce someone around like a cartoon character for a solid five minutes, and I can understand why this movie got some of the hate it got. However, I love it because it gave us something different and much more.

Advertisement

Just before this scene, Johnny Depp is on screen on the TV, explaining, “This is your brain on drugs.” The fact that he made a re-appearance, this time as himself, in the franchise after he played a character who died in the first movie, all while our character was drifting into this drug-induced dream state, dipped the moment into enough surrealism, where I can appreciate the campy, cartoonish bouncing that shortly follows.

Freddy already had so many creative fatalities under his belt that the filmmakers had to use their imagination to give us something crazier than we’d ever seen. So, we get a gleeful Freddy Krueger driving a bus into one victim and him dragging his fingernails onto a chalkboard to explode someone’s head after their hearing was amplified by some weird living hearing aid to kill another. Freddy manipulates the traumas of everyone we are introduced to, all with the intent of finding someone from his past who will help let him out of Springwood.

Freddy Krueger’s Origin Story

The amount of information packed into this movie is astounding. We get to see Freddy Krueger teased as a child (mocked for being the “son of a hundred maniacs,” which, of course, was a callback to information from previous NOES movies where Freddy Krueger was the product of his mother being assaulted by a hundred maniacs in a mental institution). Then, we see the night Freddy was killed and why he has the power to invade dreams in the first place.

Like it or not, this film is canon, and any Freddy fan would be remiss not to recognize it for the background information it gave us. Maybe more people are satisfied not knowing the story behind the monster, but to me, it only made him more terrifying.

Freddy Krueger is a Monster

This film differed from many other NOES movies by showing us Freddy in his human form when he was just a sensible-slacks-wearing neighborhood monster behind closed doors. This, to me, is the scariest version of Freddy we’ve ever been introduced to; the Freddy who doesn’t look dangerous.

Advertisement

By humanizing Freddy, this movie helped re-solidify how much of a monster he is.

During this flashback, we see Fred Krueger’s interaction with his daughter. He callously murders her mother in front of her after she discovers his secret. As he told his daughter not to tell anyone, revealing the woman we have been following has been Freddy’s child all along, he looked much more terrifying in his ‘every-man green sweater’ than the iconic red and green one.

Freddy Krueger’s Daughter

After she learns of her connection to Fred Krueger as he kills the people close to her, Kathryn Krueger’s destiny is clear: she has to kill him. If anyone was going to be worthy enough to be the one to kill Freddy Krueger “for good,” I couldn’t think of a better person than his daughter. Even if you disagree with the rest of the film, they did Freddy justice with his send-off.

How Freddy Krueger died

“First, they tried burning me. Then they tried burying me. They even tried holy water, but I just keep on ticking.”

With access to a literal arsenal of weapons to attack Freddy, filmmakers ensured that Freddy’s coroner report would come back with the word “Yes” under Cause of Death. Freddy Krueger was hit with throwing stars, a hammer with nails, a crossbow, and more, all leading up to one of my favorite moments in the franchise.

Advertisement

After donning her father’s glove herself, his daughter flicks her hand back in a way that only Fred Krueger’s offspring could and shishkabobs him. To seal the deal, she jams a stick of dynamite in his chest, and Freddy quite literally goes out with a bang.

Credits roll with a montage of kills and other memorable Freddy moments from the franchise. With a RIP, Freddy Krueger was finally no more.

…Until three years later, at least.

All in all, the film delivered an iconic send-off to Freddy. It put the inevitable destruction of the dream demon into the hands of someone who deserved to destroy him. They went over the top in every way they could, gave a memorable anthem for the real ones, and neatly answered many questions the franchise would otherwise have left unanswered. The campiness fit Freddy’s M.O.; at its worst, it can serve as a reminder of why it was time for the franchise to die in the first place. Once you’ve hit the ceiling as this movie did, there’d have been nowhere else to go but the floor (or through the fourth wall). Overall, and most importantly, Freddy’s Dead: The Final Nightmare is fun to watch, and what more can we ask of any movie?

If you have yet to see this movie, or if it’s been too long since you have, I recommend you give it a rewatch with all of this in mind.

Advertisement

And remember: “Every town has an Elm street!” (This is the movie he said that in, by the way.)

If you vehemently disagree, vent your frustrations at Horror Press on Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok! XD.

A writer by both passion and profession: Tiffany Taylor is a mother of three with a lifelong interest in all things strange or mysterious. Her love for the written word blossomed from her love of horror at a young age because scary stories played an integral role in her childhood. Today, when she isn’t reading, writing, or watching scary movies, Tiffany enjoys cooking, stargazing, and listening to music.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Editorials

Healing Powers: Elizabeth Sankey’s ‘Witches’ (2024)

Elizabeth Sankey, writer and director of Witches, was institutionalized due to postpartum psychosis. Prior to her hospital admission, she found a group of women on WhatsApp with whom to air her fears about being a mother. All women in the group had a history of pregnancy or trying to become pregnant. All would be, by our strict social ideals, bad women: the WhatsApp coven included women with thoughts of killing their children and themselves.

Published

on

“Are you a good witch or a bad witch?”
What a horrible question.

In our society, steeped in patriarchal values, this question implies that a woman, the witch, is either behaving or misbehaving, obeying or disobeying. The question limits women in who they are and what they could become. Film has much to do with social and cultural perceptions of what a woman should be. The horror genre, especially, has had the ability to imprint itself on popular culture and mold social ideas of a “good” woman and “bad” woman. “Good” women, often Final Girls, traditionally abstain from sex, drugs, and alcohol; they are down to earth, amicable, and care about others, oftentimes more than themselves. Their opposites, the bad women, are outcasts, messy, and complicated. Their distinctions are always obvious, even color-coded. Though The Craft (1996) brought a chicness to the teenage witch, by the film’s end, the bad witch, Nancy, is institutionalized, left writhing enchained in her bed, incoherently yelling. This was the fate of many “bad” women. Remove them from society, as they are uncontrollable. The witches must be burned.

Elizabeth Sankey, writer and director of Witches, was institutionalized due to postpartum psychosis. Prior to her hospital admission, she found a group of women on WhatsApp with whom to air her fears about being a mother. All women in the group had a history of pregnancy or trying to become pregnant. All would be, by our strict social ideals, bad women: the WhatsApp coven included women with thoughts of killing their children and themselves.

Who can we trust?

Motherhood is a tricky subject. American history has shown that while we need mothers, their lives are often overlooked, the baby taking center stage. The opinions and fears of mothers are left to the wayside, resulting in feelings of isolation and anxiety. After all, pregnancy can be life threatening, and is in no way as clean as it had been presented on film for decades. The maternal mortality rate has hardly changed since 2019, with approximately nineteen deaths per 100,000 live births, according to the CDC. In 2021, according to the American Medical Association, the Black maternal mortality rate was 2.6 times higher than white mothers. Suicide is a leading cause of death for recent mothers. Sankey correlates medical shortcomings, bias, discrimination, and lack of mental health resources with the skepticism women feel when sharing pregnancy-related mental struggles with doctors. Crucially, Sankey urges that guilt and shame are preventing women and those capable of pregnancy from getting the help they need, fearful they will be judged and labeled as “bad mothers,” or worse, their children are taken away from them. There is a historical basis for this, with links to 17th century America.

“Embroidered on our bones”

Sankey includes several testimonies from victims of the Salem Witch Trials, many of whom were town herbalists, midwives, and healers. These women were the ones who helped others give birth and cared for them during their healing process. However, if you were socially linked to a perceived witch during the trials, you too could be implicated. The lessons that had been learned from those trials and the hundreds of others across America in the 17th and 18th centuries were not to trust a healing woman. 

Advertisement

Sankey posits that many perceived witches of Salem suffered from various mental illnesses, leaving them vulnerable to discrimination from accusing townspeople. No longer was the healing women counted upon for birth assistance — that was now the domain of male doctors. For centuries since, women have been taught to police their neighbors and friends, lest they be accused of being “bad.” Those accused suffered the social, physical, and mental consequences. There is hope for mothers when covens are reclaimed. Once perceived as wild women celebrating the devil and conjuring demons, the coven can and should be a source of not only support, but guidance.

The Spellbook

Sankey breaks her documentary down into five chapters. In the form of spells, she outlines how to survive maternal madness. She calls on viewers to “fall into madness,” “step into the circle,” “speak your evil,” “invoke the spirits,” and, finally, “embrace the witch.” I posit, however, that her most important spell is the third. Speaking your evil is extremely daunting. One woman in particular admitted to frightening thoughts of sexually harming her child as a result of maternal OCD. “It was torture,” she stated. She chose self-harm instead of sharing these uncontrollable thoughts with anyone, let alone other mothers. Sankey, herself battling murderous thoughts from postpartum depression, felt as though she was in her own horror film, with an overwhelming sense of doom – “Living, breathing terror.” She told no doctor of the “hideous scenes” playing in her head. Instead, she looked inward. Am I evil? The WhatsApp coven sprang to action to get Sankey help when she revealed she had suicidal thoughts after days without sleep. “If we didn’t, who would?”

The medical center where Sankey was admitted was for mothers and their children. She was stripped of any potential harmful belongings, and then left alone with her child. This was extremely unsettling and traumatic for the other mothers, with some revealing it was their “biggest fear.” Under 24/7 surveillance, the therapy began. “Now,” Sankey states, “I was surrounded by witches.” These women became each others’ support, and the doctors worked through patients’ perinatal mental health issues. Removed was the stigma of “bad” motherhood. The testimony from Sankey and her fellow patients is raw, real, and frightening. Stepping into the circle requires tremendous strength and trust.

Embrace the Witch

I want to be a mother, but I am scared. As with most of my fears, I turn to horror films to sort myself out. I think of Rosemary Woodhouse, whose own husband assaulted her, and, like a patient named Dr. Cho, saw the devil in her child’s eyes. She was gaslit, denied care, and almost died during the early months of her pregnancy. After birth, she was discarded. She was no longer of use, though she was granted permission to raise the spawn of Satan. She had no agency or autonomy. This is what scares me most, as I have heard too many horror stories of women not being believed. Worse, as someone living with a mental illness, I worry I will be perceived as a “bad” mom. 

In the US, findings from the 2020 Maternal Behavioral Health Policy Evaluation (MAPLE) study show “2683 out of 595,237 insured mothers aged 15 to 44 across the US had suicidal ideation or thoughts of self-harm […] the greatest increases seen among Black; low-income; younger individuals; and people with comorbid anxiety, depression, or serious mental illness.”

Advertisement

What if my depression becomes unbearable after giving birth? What if I have thoughts of harm? What if I become a statistic? 

It was Sankey who, despite the harrowing testimony, calmed me. I know I can look to my sisters. Witches is a cathartic documentary, with empathy at its core. I urge my fellow mothers-to-be to join the coven, to embrace the witch. Embracing the witch means to heal — to shed society’s expectations of “good” motherhood. You are enough. And you are certainly not alone. 

To hell with “good” and “bad,” so long as you are a witch.

You can stream Witches on Mubi.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Editorials

‘House of Wax’ (2005) Is Secretly a 2000s Alternative Time Capsule, and a Masterwork of Horror Atmosphere

Supposedly a remake of the 1953 Vincent Price film with the same name, it could have less to do with the original. A familiar setup sees a group of college kids en route to their school’s football game, caught out of luck with a broken down car. That’s where the fun begins. They wind up camped out near a ghost town, seemingly empty except for one Bo Sinclair, who promises to help them out. As they begin to notice, it seems the only operational business is a wax museum…From then on out, we are welcomed into one of the wildest, genuinely creepiest slashers in modern memory. With dingy movie theaters, a nightmare-inducing wax museum, and one of the most nauseating and original MOs of any slasher villain, the flick feels like a walkthrough of a skillfully organized haunted attraction. Plus, it is crammed with 2000s nostalgia, with visuals that make it feel like you’re watching a full-length Hawthorne Heights music video and a soundtrack that cements it as one of the most 2005 movies of, well…2005.

Published

on

Ahh, the mid-2000s. Brendan Urie was chiming in with, “Haven’t you ever heard of closing the God Damn door?”, metalcore blasted on every station, the smell of black eyeliner and nail polish wafted through the air, and everyone could only see about half of what was around them because of the deeply gelled fringes. Essentially, emo was all the rage. However, despite its clear, of-its-era connections to alternative subcultures, the horror genre was at a weird point in its expansive existence. Between countless torture porn sequels, Japanese remakes, and an endless slew of oversaturated slashers, many films were grouped in this era as “trash”. While, undoubtedly, some of them were, this generalization caused many phenomenal films to go unnoticed or completely under the radar. This is the case with 2005’s House of Wax.

Supposedly a remake of the 1953 Vincent Price film with the same name, it could have less to do with the original. A familiar setup sees a group of college kids en route to their school’s football game, caught out of luck with a broken down car. That’s where the fun begins. They wind up camped out near a ghost town, seemingly empty except for one Bo Sinclair, who promises to help them out. As they begin to notice, it seems the only operational business is a wax museum…From then on out, we are welcomed into one of the wildest, genuinely creepiest slashers in modern memory. With dingy movie theaters, a nightmare-inducing wax museum, and one of the most nauseating and original MOs of any slasher villain, the flick feels like a walkthrough of a skillfully organized haunted attraction. Plus, it’s crammed with 2000s nostalgia, with visuals that make it feel like you’re watching a full-length Hawthorne Heights music video, and a soundtrack that cements it as one of the most 2005 movies of, well…2005.

A Terrifying Pair of Killers

One of the absolute highlights of House of Wax are the two killers, the Sinclair Brothers. Initially conjoined at birth, these twins work in tandem to run the town of Ambrose’s waxworks from Hell. Bo is the brains, luring in teens with a disarmingly normal demeanor, and wax-faced Vincent takes care of the more troublesome aspects of the business, the brutal torture and creation of the statues themselves. It harkens back to classics from the golden era of slashers, their twisted backwoods family reminiscent of Texas Chain Saw, or even the Voorhees clan in Friday The 13th. Vincent is the Leatherface to Bo’s Choptop. The Brothers’ Mom, Trudy, made wax statues, and after her death, Vincent wanted to innocently carry on her work. However, the psychopathic Bo manipulated him to make them better…more realistic…and that meant using corpses.

The means of offing teens from these brothers are some of the scariest in slasher history. Victims are paralyzed, drowned alive in boiling wax. They are forced to suffer as wax statues until they eventually die. The mannequins in the town are wax-transformed corpses, victims preserved like in a museum. It is definitely a little cheesy, and feels a lot like an early-2010s Creepypasta, but is still considerably bone chilling compared to a simple hockey mask and machete. It is a highly original MO, not only elevating the film in its own right, but putting it a step above other films in the 90s and 2000s slasher revival.

It’s All in the Vibes

During a chase scene, Carly (Elisha Cuthbert) and Nick (Chad Michael Murray) find themselves hiding from a shotgun-wielding, trucker-capped Bo Sinclair in a grimy movie theater. The theater is disgusting, covered in dust and grime, and no living human sits in the audience-only wax-mummified corpses, laden in filth and creeping bugs. Projected on the screen is Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?, a hammer-on-the-head parallel for Bo and Vincent Sinclair’s disturbed sibling relationship. As Bette Davis belts out, “I’ve Written a Letter to Daddy”, Nick and Carly sit among the figures, hoping to remain still enough so the aisle-stalking Bo does not notice and fire at them. It is a genuinely edge-of-your-seat sequence, clever in its construction and framing, the use of the human mannequin’s doubling effect creating a genuinely disorienting feeling. However, what is truly striking here, as with the rest of the movie, is the aesthetic of it.

Advertisement

This scene is one of many examples of a movie that perfectly knows how to construct its setting and build a phenomenal atmosphere. The old creepy movie, the dingy cinema, rows of once-living mannequins, and a stalking serial killer’s slow-moving pervasiveness? Everything clicks perfectly here, and it feels possibly more akin to a Halloween Horror Nights event more-so than a movie…and this is actually for the better.

The rest of the movie feels the same, all of it having this Halloween-ish, grungy, 2000s tone to it. It feels reminiscent of Rob Zombie visuals, the palettes featuring a lot of dim yellows and gross-out, tree-greens. It is of its time, absolutely, but gleefully so. The movie basks in the era, in every aspect.

Speaking of the era, the soundtrack is pretty wild. It truly captures the best of music in that era, Interpol and Disturbed both get songs on there, as well as My Chemical Romance getting too. Hell, it does not get more emo than your film closing out with a smash-to-black on Helena from Three Cheers. In the 2000s, atmosphere was one of the strongest attributes of horror, with House of Wax being the crowning achievement.  It is disappointing how this, among many other movies, were lost or ignored due to the pure oversaturation of the genre. It is oftentimes a make-or-break for any horror film of any decade, aesthetic being debatably just as important in this genre.

House of Wax excels at all of this. Its setting, costumes, and props are all beautifully and skillfully created. Luckily, It has found its cult status in the last couple of years, but its over-the-top nature should have made it an instant classic upon release.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement