Editorials
Happy 100th Birthday to ‘Haxan: Witchcraft Through the Ages’

Released in Sweden on September 18th, 1922, the movie Haxan: Witchcraft Through the Ages is officially a century old.
Broken into seven parts, the film looks at how witchcraft has been viewed over time, starting from the dawn of humanity’s belief in the fantastical, navigating from the pious 1600s to the then-present day 1920s. Despite its light-hearted score and dark humor, this film paints a grim portrait of humanity’s flaws. Rampant with unfounded paranoia, unfair accusations, elder abuse, and objectifying women, the film does not stray from delivering an intelligent take on the lack of common sense which ruled the witch trials of the past. Haxan covers this topic in a way that is still remarkably relevant today.
For the 100th anniversary of this classic film, we’ll look at the competition and controversy that plagued its emergence, along with its references, ratings, and resonating themes that culminated in creating a creepy time capsule.
The History of Haxan: Witchcraft Through the Ages
Written and directed by Benjamin Christensen, Haxan is part documentary, part fiction. Penned between 1919 and 1921, Christensen drew references from the book Malleus Maleficarum also known as “Hammer of Witches.” This fifteenth-century tome was utilized by German witch hunters.
The film cost approximately two million SEK to make, making it the most expensive silent film in all of Scandinavia. Though, the movie unfortunately never turned a profit.
Competing Releases
Competition at the time of release was the first hit against Haxan. As discussed by Richard Baxstrom and Todd Meyers in Realizing The Witch: Science, Cinema, and the Mastery of the Invisible, there was a plethora of films, and horror films specifically, that vied for the public’s eye at the time Haxan was being released, including F.W. Murnau’s classic horror movies Nosferatu and Phantom.
Though competition had marred its release, another force worked against the cinematic masterpiece.
The Haxan Controversy
The film covers various topics that ensured its controversial content was disallowed from becoming a part of the 1920s mainstream. While today the film may seem relatively tame, the depictions of witchcraft, devil worship, torture, butt cheeks galore, and demons feverishly churning butter were not welcome by many of the religiously staunch “powers that be” of the 1920s. The film was heavily censored in some European countries and outright banned in the U.S.
As explained by Baxstrom and Meyers, Haxan coincided with the emerging standard of the 1920s, where art preferred to side with science over religion. The 1920s were a peak time for Modernist writers. These classic creators, such as T.S. Eliot, Virginia Woolf, and Ernest Hemingway, were considered nihilists of literature as they created stories that did not follow the typical format and used science and philosophy to express individual thinking, altogether rebuking religion.
Many of these writers were met with political censorship in the United States and chose to create works in places that were more open to these free-thinking secular ideals, such as Paris.
Given that many were creating works in the same rebellious vein as Haxan and that more institutions were keeping an eye out for these nihilistic writers, Benjamin Christensen’s film came at a time that was simultaneously perfect and wrong.
Although governments worked diligently to stop the film from becoming widespread, Haxan made a lasting impact on audiences worldwide.
Haxan References and Reviews
The film’s excellence can be measured in love it has received and still receives today. When Louis B. Mayerscreened the film, he was quoted as saying, “Is [Christensen] crazy or a genius?” and signed Christensen to a deal with MGM.
Today Haxan: Witchcraft Through the Ages boasts a 91% critic score on Rotten Tomatoes with an 81% audience score and has received coverage on television series such as Eli Roth’s History of Horror and Mark Kermode’s Secrets of Cinema. Even the company responsible for Blair Witch Project drew inspiration from the classic, aptly titled Haxan Films.
Despite its ability to overcome a beleaguered beginning, today, the movie remains potentially controversial, but for a completely different reason than it was one hundred years ago.
Hysteria and Historical Mistreatment of Women
Because Christensen created the film with a scientific explanation in mind, the director tried to connect witchcraft accusations to women suffering from a term that was widely used in medical society at the time: hysteria.
In the memorable words of Moira (Frances Conroy) From American Horror Story: Murder House (S1: E8):
“Since the beginning of time, men find excuses to lock women away. They make up diseases like hysteria. Do you know where that word comes from? …The Greek word for uterus. […] It was a hundred years ago, but we’re no better off today.”
The idea of hysteria being an actual medical disorder has been rightfully abandoned since 1980. Though the incorporation of hysteria in Haxan: Witchcraft through the Ages is intriguing because it is presented in conjunction with the unjust persecution of women. It fits into the sexist, patriarchal theme that resides within the first six parts of the film, closing on a note that even if they aren’t being subjected to the literal fires of persecution anymore, women still suffer from the ignorance of men.
Women were not the only ones who received mistreatment in history and in the movie. Neither age nor appearance, nor gender, could keep one safe from the dreadful actions of mankind.
Creating a Creepy Time Capsule
Though compared with today’s standards of realistic violence, CGI monsters, and jump scares, Haxan is basically a movie for children; this comparably tame film has several unsettling qualities that make it genuinely frightening.
Watching a movie about the past, which is now an artifact of a century passed, gives an eerie feeling independent of the subject matter presented. When viewed this way, combined with ancient depictions of evil and the cold disposition of man, the film is disturbing in a way that sinks into your bones.
Though the movie is comprised of scenes created by production crews and acted out by performers, the inspiration behind these scenes is palpably apparent. Running constantly in the foreground of the film is the historical basis. Real people died due to these grave, ignorant injustices. That alone can create a haunting impact on anyone who views the film.
To add to the already aberrant creepiness, Haxan’s age all but guarantees that every single person involved in the making of it is now long since deceased, as they live on as ghosts flickering on the screen.
(That is unless the immortal Lisle Von Rhuman from Death Becomes Her and her magical potion of eternal youth is real. In which case, these actors could be hanging out in a mansion in Hollywood Hills, celebrating the 100th anniversary of Haxan).
Although it was created generations ago, the black and white silent film is still just as captivating and resonating today. It was not always received well, yet it continues to receive high ratings, despite its potentially problematic conclusion and beleaguered early development. The clever commentary the film makes, and its no-holds approach to depicting historical injustices and dark subject matter while maintaining a light and humorous tone is impressive in its duality. It has culminated into a creepy classic that has withstood time. Happy 100th Birthday, Haxan!
Watch it now on HBO Max.
Editorials
Healing Powers: Elizabeth Sankey’s ‘Witches’ (2024)
Elizabeth Sankey, writer and director of Witches, was institutionalized due to postpartum psychosis. Prior to her hospital admission, she found a group of women on WhatsApp with whom to air her fears about being a mother. All women in the group had a history of pregnancy or trying to become pregnant. All would be, by our strict social ideals, bad women: the WhatsApp coven included women with thoughts of killing their children and themselves.

“Are you a good witch or a bad witch?”
What a horrible question.
In our society, steeped in patriarchal values, this question implies that a woman, the witch, is either behaving or misbehaving, obeying or disobeying. The question limits women in who they are and what they could become. Film has much to do with social and cultural perceptions of what a woman should be. The horror genre, especially, has had the ability to imprint itself on popular culture and mold social ideas of a “good” woman and “bad” woman. “Good” women, often Final Girls, traditionally abstain from sex, drugs, and alcohol; they are down to earth, amicable, and care about others, oftentimes more than themselves. Their opposites, the bad women, are outcasts, messy, and complicated. Their distinctions are always obvious, even color-coded. Though The Craft (1996) brought a chicness to the teenage witch, by the film’s end, the bad witch, Nancy, is institutionalized, left writhing enchained in her bed, incoherently yelling. This was the fate of many “bad” women. Remove them from society, as they are uncontrollable. The witches must be burned.
Elizabeth Sankey, writer and director of Witches, was institutionalized due to postpartum psychosis. Prior to her hospital admission, she found a group of women on WhatsApp with whom to air her fears about being a mother. All women in the group had a history of pregnancy or trying to become pregnant. All would be, by our strict social ideals, bad women: the WhatsApp coven included women with thoughts of killing their children and themselves.
Who can we trust?
Motherhood is a tricky subject. American history has shown that while we need mothers, their lives are often overlooked, the baby taking center stage. The opinions and fears of mothers are left to the wayside, resulting in feelings of isolation and anxiety. After all, pregnancy can be life threatening, and is in no way as clean as it had been presented on film for decades. The maternal mortality rate has hardly changed since 2019, with approximately nineteen deaths per 100,000 live births, according to the CDC. In 2021, according to the American Medical Association, the Black maternal mortality rate was 2.6 times higher than white mothers. Suicide is a leading cause of death for recent mothers. Sankey correlates medical shortcomings, bias, discrimination, and lack of mental health resources with the skepticism women feel when sharing pregnancy-related mental struggles with doctors. Crucially, Sankey urges that guilt and shame are preventing women and those capable of pregnancy from getting the help they need, fearful they will be judged and labeled as “bad mothers,” or worse, their children are taken away from them. There is a historical basis for this, with links to 17th century America.
“Embroidered on our bones”
Sankey includes several testimonies from victims of the Salem Witch Trials, many of whom were town herbalists, midwives, and healers. These women were the ones who helped others give birth and cared for them during their healing process. However, if you were socially linked to a perceived witch during the trials, you too could be implicated. The lessons that had been learned from those trials and the hundreds of others across America in the 17th and 18th centuries were not to trust a healing woman.
Sankey posits that many perceived witches of Salem suffered from various mental illnesses, leaving them vulnerable to discrimination from accusing townspeople. No longer was the healing women counted upon for birth assistance — that was now the domain of male doctors. For centuries since, women have been taught to police their neighbors and friends, lest they be accused of being “bad.” Those accused suffered the social, physical, and mental consequences. There is hope for mothers when covens are reclaimed. Once perceived as wild women celebrating the devil and conjuring demons, the coven can and should be a source of not only support, but guidance.
The Spellbook
Sankey breaks her documentary down into five chapters. In the form of spells, she outlines how to survive maternal madness. She calls on viewers to “fall into madness,” “step into the circle,” “speak your evil,” “invoke the spirits,” and, finally, “embrace the witch.” I posit, however, that her most important spell is the third. Speaking your evil is extremely daunting. One woman in particular admitted to frightening thoughts of sexually harming her child as a result of maternal OCD. “It was torture,” she stated. She chose self-harm instead of sharing these uncontrollable thoughts with anyone, let alone other mothers. Sankey, herself battling murderous thoughts from postpartum depression, felt as though she was in her own horror film, with an overwhelming sense of doom – “Living, breathing terror.” She told no doctor of the “hideous scenes” playing in her head. Instead, she looked inward. Am I evil? The WhatsApp coven sprang to action to get Sankey help when she revealed she had suicidal thoughts after days without sleep. “If we didn’t, who would?”
The medical center where Sankey was admitted was for mothers and their children. She was stripped of any potential harmful belongings, and then left alone with her child. This was extremely unsettling and traumatic for the other mothers, with some revealing it was their “biggest fear.” Under 24/7 surveillance, the therapy began. “Now,” Sankey states, “I was surrounded by witches.” These women became each others’ support, and the doctors worked through patients’ perinatal mental health issues. Removed was the stigma of “bad” motherhood. The testimony from Sankey and her fellow patients is raw, real, and frightening. Stepping into the circle requires tremendous strength and trust.
Embrace the Witch
I want to be a mother, but I am scared. As with most of my fears, I turn to horror films to sort myself out. I think of Rosemary Woodhouse, whose own husband assaulted her, and, like a patient named Dr. Cho, saw the devil in her child’s eyes. She was gaslit, denied care, and almost died during the early months of her pregnancy. After birth, she was discarded. She was no longer of use, though she was granted permission to raise the spawn of Satan. She had no agency or autonomy. This is what scares me most, as I have heard too many horror stories of women not being believed. Worse, as someone living with a mental illness, I worry I will be perceived as a “bad” mom.
In the US, findings from the 2020 Maternal Behavioral Health Policy Evaluation (MAPLE) study show “2683 out of 595,237 insured mothers aged 15 to 44 across the US had suicidal ideation or thoughts of self-harm […] the greatest increases seen among Black; low-income; younger individuals; and people with comorbid anxiety, depression, or serious mental illness.”
What if my depression becomes unbearable after giving birth? What if I have thoughts of harm? What if I become a statistic?
It was Sankey who, despite the harrowing testimony, calmed me. I know I can look to my sisters. Witches is a cathartic documentary, with empathy at its core. I urge my fellow mothers-to-be to join the coven, to embrace the witch. Embracing the witch means to heal — to shed society’s expectations of “good” motherhood. You are enough. And you are certainly not alone.
To hell with “good” and “bad,” so long as you are a witch.
You can stream Witches on Mubi.
Editorials
‘House of Wax’ (2005) Is Secretly a 2000s Alternative Time Capsule, and a Masterwork of Horror Atmosphere
Supposedly a remake of the 1953 Vincent Price film with the same name, it could have less to do with the original. A familiar setup sees a group of college kids en route to their school’s football game, caught out of luck with a broken down car. That’s where the fun begins. They wind up camped out near a ghost town, seemingly empty except for one Bo Sinclair, who promises to help them out. As they begin to notice, it seems the only operational business is a wax museum…From then on out, we are welcomed into one of the wildest, genuinely creepiest slashers in modern memory. With dingy movie theaters, a nightmare-inducing wax museum, and one of the most nauseating and original MOs of any slasher villain, the flick feels like a walkthrough of a skillfully organized haunted attraction. Plus, it is crammed with 2000s nostalgia, with visuals that make it feel like you’re watching a full-length Hawthorne Heights music video and a soundtrack that cements it as one of the most 2005 movies of, well…2005.

Ahh, the mid-2000s. Brendan Urie was chiming in with, “Haven’t you ever heard of closing the God Damn door?”, metalcore blasted on every station, the smell of black eyeliner and nail polish wafted through the air, and everyone could only see about half of what was around them because of the deeply gelled fringes. Essentially, emo was all the rage. However, despite its clear, of-its-era connections to alternative subcultures, the horror genre was at a weird point in its expansive existence. Between countless torture porn sequels, Japanese remakes, and an endless slew of oversaturated slashers, many films were grouped in this era as “trash”. While, undoubtedly, some of them were, this generalization caused many phenomenal films to go unnoticed or completely under the radar. This is the case with 2005’s House of Wax.
Supposedly a remake of the 1953 Vincent Price film with the same name, it could have less to do with the original. A familiar setup sees a group of college kids en route to their school’s football game, caught out of luck with a broken down car. That’s where the fun begins. They wind up camped out near a ghost town, seemingly empty except for one Bo Sinclair, who promises to help them out. As they begin to notice, it seems the only operational business is a wax museum…From then on out, we are welcomed into one of the wildest, genuinely creepiest slashers in modern memory. With dingy movie theaters, a nightmare-inducing wax museum, and one of the most nauseating and original MOs of any slasher villain, the flick feels like a walkthrough of a skillfully organized haunted attraction. Plus, it’s crammed with 2000s nostalgia, with visuals that make it feel like you’re watching a full-length Hawthorne Heights music video, and a soundtrack that cements it as one of the most 2005 movies of, well…2005.
A Terrifying Pair of Killers
One of the absolute highlights of House of Wax are the two killers, the Sinclair Brothers. Initially conjoined at birth, these twins work in tandem to run the town of Ambrose’s waxworks from Hell. Bo is the brains, luring in teens with a disarmingly normal demeanor, and wax-faced Vincent takes care of the more troublesome aspects of the business, the brutal torture and creation of the statues themselves. It harkens back to classics from the golden era of slashers, their twisted backwoods family reminiscent of Texas Chain Saw, or even the Voorhees clan in Friday The 13th. Vincent is the Leatherface to Bo’s Choptop. The Brothers’ Mom, Trudy, made wax statues, and after her death, Vincent wanted to innocently carry on her work. However, the psychopathic Bo manipulated him to make them better…more realistic…and that meant using corpses.
The means of offing teens from these brothers are some of the scariest in slasher history. Victims are paralyzed, drowned alive in boiling wax. They are forced to suffer as wax statues until they eventually die. The mannequins in the town are wax-transformed corpses, victims preserved like in a museum. It is definitely a little cheesy, and feels a lot like an early-2010s Creepypasta, but is still considerably bone chilling compared to a simple hockey mask and machete. It is a highly original MO, not only elevating the film in its own right, but putting it a step above other films in the 90s and 2000s slasher revival.
It’s All in the Vibes
During a chase scene, Carly (Elisha Cuthbert) and Nick (Chad Michael Murray) find themselves hiding from a shotgun-wielding, trucker-capped Bo Sinclair in a grimy movie theater. The theater is disgusting, covered in dust and grime, and no living human sits in the audience-only wax-mummified corpses, laden in filth and creeping bugs. Projected on the screen is Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?, a hammer-on-the-head parallel for Bo and Vincent Sinclair’s disturbed sibling relationship. As Bette Davis belts out, “I’ve Written a Letter to Daddy”, Nick and Carly sit among the figures, hoping to remain still enough so the aisle-stalking Bo does not notice and fire at them. It is a genuinely edge-of-your-seat sequence, clever in its construction and framing, the use of the human mannequin’s doubling effect creating a genuinely disorienting feeling. However, what is truly striking here, as with the rest of the movie, is the aesthetic of it.
This scene is one of many examples of a movie that perfectly knows how to construct its setting and build a phenomenal atmosphere. The old creepy movie, the dingy cinema, rows of once-living mannequins, and a stalking serial killer’s slow-moving pervasiveness? Everything clicks perfectly here, and it feels possibly more akin to a Halloween Horror Nights event more-so than a movie…and this is actually for the better.
The rest of the movie feels the same, all of it having this Halloween-ish, grungy, 2000s tone to it. It feels reminiscent of Rob Zombie visuals, the palettes featuring a lot of dim yellows and gross-out, tree-greens. It is of its time, absolutely, but gleefully so. The movie basks in the era, in every aspect.
Speaking of the era, the soundtrack is pretty wild. It truly captures the best of music in that era, Interpol and Disturbed both get songs on there, as well as My Chemical Romance getting too. Hell, it does not get more emo than your film closing out with a smash-to-black on Helena from Three Cheers. In the 2000s, atmosphere was one of the strongest attributes of horror, with House of Wax being the crowning achievement. It is disappointing how this, among many other movies, were lost or ignored due to the pure oversaturation of the genre. It is oftentimes a make-or-break for any horror film of any decade, aesthetic being debatably just as important in this genre.
House of Wax excels at all of this. Its setting, costumes, and props are all beautifully and skillfully created. Luckily, It has found its cult status in the last couple of years, but its over-the-top nature should have made it an instant classic upon release.